There's an old adage about standards: the great thing about them is there are so many to choose from. That pretty accurately describes the state of USB power in 2021. In this video, Chris explains everything you need to know about USB power including the different types, how to calculate power delivery, and the terminology you need to know.
An enjoyable and interesting video, but there are a couple of slip-ups to point out. The first was around 1:45 in the piece, where you were explaining about mAh ratings: the BG-100 power unit you had, claimed 10,000mAh, and the Olympus BLH-1 battery had a capacity of 1,720mAh of output. You did the math, 10,000/1.720 = 5.8 charges ...
Two problems: (1) - the power bank has only 5V output, the Oly Battery is 7.4v. And as you said earlier, W = VA (power in watts is current in amps times potential in volts).
Even rating the BG-100 at 50Wh (10,000mAh * 5v), and the BLH-1 at 12.7Wh (1,720mAh * 7.4V), you get 50/12.7 = 3.9 recharges. The BG-100 itself quotes only 37Wh, and 37/12.7 = just 2.9 recharges.
NOT to mention efficiency, which is never 100% - some of the watts in, turn to heat, and never come back out.
And finally, at 11:00 minutes in about bespoke battery chargers: these are ESSENTIAL - so you can be charging one battery, while using your camera with another!
KEY point to remember: mAh (milli-amp-hours) is NO measure of ENERGY without reference to voltage. Which is why we should always be talking in [milli]Watt Hours ([m]Wh).
Simply - 1000mAh at 250V is the same amount of energy as 50,000mAh at 5V, in this case, both 50,000mWh (or 50 Wh).
@Biowizard It's even more complicated than that, because the battery voltage tends to go down when larger currents are drawn from it, and also at low state of charge. That cell rated at 3.7V will only deliver 3.7V when it's fully charged and you're barely drawing any current. EOS 1D mark III's shutter starts slowing down as the battery loses charge simply because it can't squeeze enough power out of the battery.
Using a $4,000 camera as a battery charger is nuts. Lens rentals pointed out on the R5 the USB jack is directly connected to the mainboard. All jack repairs will involve a new mainboard.
@chris, this is a fantastic video. So much of this basic stuff is usually overlooked but is actually critical to successful production especially in the field. You did a great job explaining things without getting too technical. Kudos on that.
A correction: you said a 10,000 mAh battery pack can charge a 1720 mAh battery, 5.8x, but your math is based on being able to use all 10,000 mAh. The fact is that you can never get ALL of the 10,000 mAh out of the battery pack- you can never deplete the cells to zero. All cells have a "base" capacity where you simply can't draw any more. Moreover, lithium packs have controller boards that will stop output to protect the cells. The same goes with the battery pack for the camera. It's 1720 mAh, but you'll never drain it to zero. It's almost impossible 2 know actual "usable" capacity of the battery pack- dependent on the type of cells, the number of cells, etc, and much easier for the manufacturer to just label with total capacity.
Secondly, you noted that all kinds of PD rated gear can be charged by universal PD rated adapters. You say this is more convenient than AC battery chargers.
I find having a battery on a charger, separate from using my camera in a gimbal to be far more convenient than trying to power the camera with a wire, or charge it while using it. Your mileage may vary.
This is especially relevant for camcorder batteries like the ubiquitous NP-F (Sony Infolithium-L) battery that is used for cameras, lights, monitors, and a lot more these days. A single 7800 mAh NP-F can run gear for hours at a time, while another set of batteries are getting juiced back up in "video village." I find a 5 second battery swap to be the most convenient solution for mobile filming than having my camera tethered to an external power source.
This is what works for me. Again, Kudos on a fantastic video about an important, and near universally overlooked topic.
Also, as a Panasonic employee noted on the YouTube video- some devices can't charge and run the camera at the same time, or can only trickle charge if the camera is running, and either of those are dependent on the wattage of the power adapter / battery bank, and the capacity / capability of the camera to draw and utilize enough power to do one, or the other, or both. Making it a lot of cross referencing minute, obscure, and sometimes simply unavailable specifications. Again, making the case to charge the batteries externally.
Also, often the faster you charge, the less of that capacity you will get. Lots of power banks will print the capacity at different power draw on the bank.
Don't colours look a little bit strange? Like they were on a brink of overexposure on Chris' forehead. And I see some odd yellow-red (or oragne-pink) transitions on the face.
DPR, you really should have a gallery of usual suspects with colour checkers :)
I have found that a USB C to micro USB cable is really useful. The extra power of a USB C power adaptor allows me to recharge old tablets that won't take charge from older USB A power adaptors. I adopted USB C when I got a Nexus 5x in 2015. Everything since then has been USB C.
For those who lived through the Plug & Play era of PC expansion cards: Plug & Pray. Though to be honest, my work laptop has USB-C, the docking stations have USB-C, the meeting rooms have USB-C and it all just works. It's the first time I've not had cable spaghetti or been in dongle hell. It actually works.
I am probably just traumatized by microUSB connectors.
I do remember Plug and Pray. It could easily take 10 hours to get a sound card working in Windows. It was like trying to type your password with autocorrection on with no manual override, and all you could see being ******. The only reason why it was possible to make it right is that there is a bug in the software that sometimes disables the autocorrection.
With DOS there were no issues: You set the card to use IRQ 11 and told the program that the card uses IRQ 11. How nice.
@pannumon this is veering off topic but getting sound cards working reminds me of my very fist home PC which was a Fujitsu that had an Aztech sound card. I tried Linux on it and no sound. Went on the Linux distributions forum (or it may have even be Usenet if you know what this is) and ended up talking to a developer who suggested a code change to the driver which I duly made, compiled, installed and it worked!
It was very satisfying but I am not sure I'd take the trouble these days despite decades working in software development.
A really useful briefing for an amateur who has not really thought too much about this stuff. I tend to just use the battery chargers that come with the cameras, but I can see I need to get a tad more savvy about this. Thanks for the video,
Dam Chris, you gave me a scare when you mention the Nikon Z5 and PD type Powerbanks. I bought a cheap 10000mAh 12W but light weight one to use as a backup for my camera bag. Prety sure it is not PD rated, so had to test if it works (never tried it as I use wall chargers) but glad to say it works with the Z5. Slow but working.
IDK. It's just what they reported. I'm not sure if or how long the 10,000 mAh units will run for or if they can power the camera adequately. You also have to be careful with cheap power bricks too, because not all batteries are made equal, and you really want clean power going to the camera. Things like smartphones and tablets are a little more tolerant to variations in power flow but cameras may be less tolerant and in some extreme cases you could damage the camera (espeically if there is any type of surge). Computer USB ports are usually more protected than power bricks for the concern of surging.
My Fuji X-H1 is the USB 3.0 having the wider USB B connector with extra pins, like my Galaxy S5 had. I like this connector because it's wider and more robust, but anyway.. it will charge the battery in the camera (but not the ones in the grips, as many a Fuji user has lamented) or power the camera, but not both at the same time.
If you mean 3.0 Micro B, they are a terrible hack job and not more robust. No idea who came up with the idea at consortium, but there is a good reason these ports never really found implementation and died really quickly. Even before USB C many gone back to the old USB 2.0 connector because they were incredibly terrible. The only advantage is that you can ignore that part and just plug in a normal USB Micro B so you don't have to suffer. Panasonics worst decision was putting that thing on the G9 after the GH5 had USB-C months earlier.
@NoSasaeng what about it was terrible? Its enhanced current capacity? The fact that unlike regular USB Micro B, you could actually see the notch with less than perfect (some of us have to wear reading glasses) vision and connect it right side up the first time? Or the fact that I could hold my Galaxy S5 up horizontally by the connected wider USB cable and break neither phone nor connector? In other words, it was a lot more robust than the easily bent USB-Micro B.
It's mAh as in mili amp x hour, not mili amp per hour. And then you compared mAh without looking at the voltage...you have to compare watt-hour to know how many times you can charge a battery from another one. And then there are charging losses. So your pack could probably charge your battery 2 times.
A couple of comments, particular for Olympus/OM cameras:
1) External battery chargers are very useful if you go through several batteries in the course of a day. It is easy to carry a set of batteries and plop a new one in as needed. You can even get multiple chargers and charge batteries in parallel. I've shot renaissance faires with 2-3 cameras, and at the end of the day, I often need to charge 6 batteries before the next day.
2) Unfortunately the E-m1 mark III will only charge the battery in the camera. It will not charge the battery in the HLD-9 battery grip (HLD-9 was designed for the earlier E-m1 mark II which did not do charging).
3) The E-m5 mark III, E-m1 mark III and E-m1x cameras will only charge batteries if the camera is off. It will not charge batteries if the camera has gone to sleep.
4) If memory serves, the E-m1 mark III cannot be powered with USB C-PD if you are using external HDMI.
5) The cable that comes with the E-m1 mark III does not support USB C-PD.
One other thing. If you are carrying powerbanks and traveling, be sure to look up the regulations for carrying the powerbank. In the USA, the rules are something like:
1) All batteries outside of a device must go in carry on luggage and be protected from short circuits.
2) The powerbank must have less than 100Wh capacity. Some of the higher capacity powerbanks are approaching that 100Wh limit. The last thing you want to do is get into an argument at the gate of whether your powerbank is ok.
3) It is fairly rare to have A/C adapters that can support more than 1 USB C-PD port at a time. They might have more than one A port, but typically only 1 USB C-PD port.
4) At times I wish there was a cheap powerbank multiplexer that I could plug in separate powerbanks each of which uses USB C-PD, and the output is USB C-PD. The multiplexer would cycle through the batteries using one until it is depleted and then going on to the next.
6) USB-C on E-M1iii can support PD or data but not both at the same time.
Tethering an E-M1iii to a PC via USB-C enables the PC to control the camera but doesn't power it. For a prolonged tethered shoot you have to provide power by another route. I use the 9V DC input on the HLD-9 grip which adds bulk and another cable to manage. I don't know if the issue lies within the USB-PD specifications or in Olympus's implementation of them.
" 3) It is fairly rare to have A/C adapters that can support more than 1 USB C-PD port at a time. They might have more than one A port, but typically only 1 USB C-PD port. "
Yeah that's often a confusing bit to people who are used to USB-A chargers with half a dozen ports (or even the common dual charger). This is starting to become somewhat more common for USB-C tho, there were a bunch of solid 2x 18W (which might not be enough for a camera) AC adapters last year but I've seen some higher wattage one since.
I think the USB-IF changed the rules on that? Previously all USB-C ports on a charger had to be able to deliver the same max wattage simultaneously, I think manufacturers are now allowed to have one higher power port and one lower power port or to balance the output between them...
I'd really appreciate it if camera manufacturers made a trend with making their cameras PD compatible, but still capable of trickle charging over an old USB connection. My Nikon and Sony charge fine on a 2.4A USB adapter; but my point and shoot Canon always needed a special PD charger. The irony is that if I took the battery out of the Canon and put it on a 3rd party USB battery charger hooked up to the old USB port it charged fine.
But there are many times we'll leave our charging kit at home and need to charge overnight using the hotel USB or some cheap USB cigarette adapter we picked up at a gas station. You know a camera manufacturer is looking out for you if they keep the backwards compatibility built in.
The Olympus E-M1iii featured in the video, when turned off, charges from any USB power supply but, it it is turned on, can be powered (but not charged) via USB-PD.
Yeah that should be standard. Seems like there are more cameras from the transition period when PD was new that could do both. But now that PD has been around a while newer cameras are losing the ability to charge on power levels below PD. I'm sure it costs a few extra pennies to have dual ability on the circuit board, but it's such a benefit for such a small change.
I just wish this were easier to research! I want something that can both charge and be charged over 100W USB-C PD. I also want it to be as small as possible! Less than 10,000 mAh is perfect. I wish some website had product drop-downs were I could select maximum charging power both in and out, and select maximum capacity.
Seems like everything that does 100W is well over 20,000 mAh and very bulky and heavy. And most batteries under 10,000 mAh do 18W....maybe a 30W if you're lucky.
Why do you need 100watt input on such a small battery? I have the 25,600 Anker elite which comes with a 65 watt charger. They claim three hours to full recharge the thing.
A 10k mAH unit with a 100 watt charger would be 30 minutes versus 60 with a 65 watt? If you really needed that fast a turn around I'd just get two powerbanks.
10 amp hours (10,000 milliamp-hours) at 3.7 volts nominal is 37 watt hours. So 100W is almost 3C discharge and charge.
3C discharge is doable (albeit potentially only with cells optimized for power and not capacity), 3C charge is generally a bad idea for most chemistries.
I need something that fits in my pocket that can charge my M1 Max at full load. I am often on technical climbs in the mountains where weight is a huge constraint.
your (MBP) M1 Max has a 100Wh battery, so what would a small 10,000mAh/3.7V = 37Wh powerbank be of use to you? With charging losses you'd be lucky to add 25% to your MBP battery... You'd need a 40,000mAh one to fully charge an empty MBP battery.
Again, weight is my #1 concern. I am a mountaineering photographer/videographer. My workload is not typical. I love how when you ask a question on internet forums, instead of getting an answer, you get something "why would you want to do that?!" So helpful!
While most of the cameras talked about in dpreview still have external batteries (and most have external chargers for those batteries), I recall looking at action cameras and there a lot of the units have no external battery. You have to charge the battery via USB and usually the camera is unavailable while charging.
A hidden problem with non-removable batteries is that batteries often degrade over time. I've seen recommendations that you should consider replacing batteries about 3-4 years after they were made. If the camera (or cellphone or laptop) does not have a replaceable battery, you typically have to trash the item and replace it.
Even with replaceable batteries, you can get the problem that after a camera maker has gone out of business or switched to a new battery type with latest models that the original batteries are no longer being made. You can switch to third party batteries but the problem is most third party batteries are cheaply made and not reliable.
The M1 sips power, that's its main selling point. Can't you just leave it turned off til import/edit time, use it, then turn it off again? If all the glowing M1 reviews are correct, then you should be able to do this for five or six days at least, on one charge.
Edit: Can see this being very good use case for M1. There's no way my current laptop could do that. Or that I'd want to carry it on the hike because it's a big ole' gamer special ;-)
Bolton: that is true, but also, it's often literally cold booting. Laptops will report (falsely) that their battery is dead when they are at -10F and colder (as they are on glaciated peaks). But if they are plugged in, they will boot up. Once they are booted up, they run reasonably well without needing to be plugged in anymore.
I don't own an E-m1 mark III, just E-m5 mark III. I was testing the E-m5 mark III before buying it. I had 2 places I was taking pictures that day. I normally let the camera go to sleep when I'm holding it rather than turning it off. I got into the car to drive to the second location, and I connected the camera to my car's power port but I didn't turn off the camera. The battery was not charged because the camera wasn't off. Since I have other Olympus cameras with the BLS battery it wasn't a big deal, since I had spare batteries. But it could have been an issue if I didn't have spares.
I've also had the issue where I'm downloading photos to the computer (where the camera has to be on to transfer the photos) but until I turn off the camera, it doesn't charge the battery.
It is fairly minor, but I do run into it from time to time.
@strawbale: the 16" Macbook Pro as a 8,000mAh battery and charges at 100W. It doesn't seem unreasonable that people would want a 100W-capable battery bank at around 10,000 mAh, given that these laptops are selling so well that they are backordered well into February. This would be enough to fully charge one of these machine at (almost, long story about 140W fast charging...) full charging speed.
Again, weight is my #1 concern. I am a mountaineering photographer/videographer. My workload is not typical. I love how when you ask a question on internet forums, instead of getting an answer, you get something "why would you want to do that?!" So helpful!"
You should have stated in your original post that "25% is exactly how much I'm looking to add" and nobody would have bothered (to answer) you.
Solution for allowing bootup from cold in -10C: put the laptop in a jacket or otherwise close to your for 10 minutes so it can warm up. I've done this with cold phones and camera batteries too.
At least nowadays, the storage is solid state so no worries of condensation on spinning platters.
"the 16" Macbook Pro as a 8,000mAh battery and charges at 100W. It doesn't seem unreasonable that people would want a 100W-capable battery bank at around 10,000 mAh, given that these laptops are selling so well that they are backordered well into February. This would be enough to fully charge (almost, long story about 140W fast charging...) the computer one time."
You make the same beginner's mistake as Chris does in his video (at 2:00): comparing (m)Ah between battery and power bank to calculate how many charges you have - as explained (see my post from 3 hrs ago as well as the numerous responses to Chris on YT), you need to compared the (m)Wh capacity (as that's the energy unit).
In doing so you'll find a direct relation between (m)Wh and the weight of power bank - even you cannot defy the physics involved.
Please do your homework before you get back (again)
Bolton: that would definitely work, but there is no way I'm pressing an efficient conductor like aluminum right up against my body! It's bad enough using an (aluminum) ice axe with thick gloves on!
PS: you could ask someone to make you a 8,000 mAh 100W PD powerbank, but at 18V (in stead of 3.7V), which would be able to charge your laptop fully. However, it'd be roughly the same weight as a 40,000mAh/3.7V powerbank :-D
"Laptops will report (falsely) that their battery is dead when they are at -10F and colder (as they are on glaciated peaks). But if they are plugged in, they will boot up." And that's why what you want is literally impossible.
If the laptop's own 100 watt-hour battery can't provide the juice at 1C discharge, what makes you think a 37 watt hour battery with the same chemistry at the same temperature is somehow going to achieve 3C sustained discharge?
For reference, my car can only do about 2.3C discharge (150 kW from a 66 kWh battery) for very short bursts, and needs to heat up the battery to do that. It can only exceed 1C charge rates for a few seconds at most, and barely, and only if the battery is above 40F.
Entropy: what I want is literally possible because I did it last week in Alaska, where I live, when my laptop was at -18F when I was shooting the Northern lights. If you don't believe me, please go look at the photos I took on my Instagram. ( I simply put the battery bank in my pocket, underneath four layers, It's not really practical to do that with a laptop (
If your 16 in m1 Max MacBook Pro is not booting at negative 18° f when plugged into a battery bank, maybe send it back to Apple? Because mine boots, every time.
Note in terms of the E-m1 mark II/III you have another option if you use the HLD-9 battery grip. The HLD-9 has a 5.5mm x 2.5mm external power jack that you can feed it 9 volts of power. I haven't tested the E-m1 mark III, but the E-m1 mark II only uses about 1 amp of power at 9 volts. So if you have a battery or A/C adapter that can produce 9 volts at 2 amps or more you can power the camera with that. You might need to get a 5.5mm x 2.1mm to 5.5mm x 2.5mm adapter for the power plug.
The E-m1x is easier since it has the 5.5mm x 2.5mm port on the body itself.
If you have powerbanks that support USB C-PD, you can get so-called trigger adapters that take USB C-PD in and produce 9 volts output that you can use to to power the camera.
With many of the cameras, you can also use dummy batteries. Usually the dummy batteries are inconvenient to use (particularly on Olympus cameras) in getting the power cable out, but it is an option.
Great info, thanks! I could have used this help a couple of months ago while designing a mobile editing system around an iPad Pro + Belkin hub + external HD + ? charger. The hub had a minimum watt requirement that was not easy to find and not cheap. Settled on the Anker PowerPort Atom PD 4 which arrived surprisingly large and heavy but it does the job. Evidently others think so as well: product is currently sold out on their website. Now gotta review my cables.
An addition: There is risk with USB charging in camera that often is overlooked vs charging the battery in a free standing charger and that is if there is a short circuit due a cable damage, the camera could be damaged. See this thread: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/65677892
PD is so upto date they updated a few months back . -) USB PD is now up to 2.1. But at least at 240 watts almost everything short of a desktop should be okay.
It's been slow going, confusing at times, and involved plenty of mistakes by pretty much all major manufacturers early on (from Apple to Google to Anker); but USB PD is pretty much the defacto standard now and at this point it's been around in force for like ~4 years so finding compatible stuff is much less of an issue.
You're still not gonna find cheapo PD chargers at the gas station, but it's pretty easy to get set up so most of your gear can be charged over USB PD. I'm not rushing out to do so myself and I still need to carry some micro cables but USB-C to micro adapters are no big deal either.
It's a pretty well thought out and scalable standard, USB power had never been this versatile.
(at 2:00) Chris is comparing mAh for camera battery and powerbank, but to calculate how many times you can (roughly) charge the one with the other you'd need to look at the energy capacity of both, i.e. their (m)Wh, not their (m)Ah. In (t)his example: powerbank = 37Wh, camera battery = 7.4V*1720mAh=12.728Wh, i.e. you can charge the camera battery max 2.9 times (not 5.8 times).
I also thought about that when I saw the video. The hotter things get the higher the loss will be since parts of the energy is not used for charging but for producing heat.
Yup and the internal voltage of the powerbank seems to be 3.7V ( 3.7V*10.000mAh = 37Wh) whereas the camera battery has 7.4V Internal.
These voltages inside the device have nothing to do with input or output, but when they are not printed on the thing people might think the given max current in 1 hour (in mAh often) is the capacity.
Just remember: electrical Power is Volts*Amps, or VA = Watts. And Capacity is Volts*Amps-hours, or Wh = Watt-hours
Volts alone, Amps alone or in this case mAh's alone mean nothing.
The internal voltage of the powerbank (3.7v-3.8v) is due to the powerbank using a single cell li-po battery. Most cameras use a pair of li-po batteries that provide a combined voltage of 7.2v-7.4v.
And it's USB 1 through 4. USB 3 has gone through 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2, which are now 3.2 Gen 1x1, Gen 2x1, and Gen 2x2. Also USB A through C, with A and B having Mini and Micro. Ain't nuthin universal 'bout that! :-) As anyone who has picked up the wrong cable/connector for their device knows. Which is just about everyone. Type C has some promise for actually living up to "universal."
It's too bad they didn't stick with Intel's original spec of optical cables for data versus copper, because the light based data rates were 10 times that of copper.
Optical cables might've never caught on with the mass market tho, too fragile/expensive. Apple is kinda funny cause they've actually been a big part of a strong push behind the USB PD standard when it comes to their laptops, yet they're still clinging to Lighting for their phones. 🤷🏻♂️
Tbh we are pushing 40Gbit/s over 3 meters with copper Thunderbolt already. For 99% of consumer uses, the copper won't be the limiting factor. CFexpress 2.0 is like 32 Gbit/s max. And that's when they are connected to PCI-e 3.0 x4 connections. Your camera probably won't reach that. And CFexpress 2.0 is already pretty fast, you could unload your 512gb card in a bit over 2 minutes at the maximum speed. But most cards max out at like 1.5-2 GB/s which is less than even Thunderbolt 2. And when you reach the types of speed CFexpress 2.0 can offer the capacity will probably be the bigger issues.
Well you can spend $500 on a optical thunderbolt cable, it's just that for most people, the 3 meters is probably enough for most stuff where you need high speed. Only data cable longer in my house is probably my ethernet cables. And even then, you can send 10 Gbit/s over 100 meters with Cat 6A. The increased complexity and price just make it pretty unattractive for consumers. If you want to carry ethernet over long distances or with extreme speeds, it has it's use. Sure it's expensive (100GbE switches start at like 10k) but if you are trying to connect a whole internet backbone you got little choice. But most consumer PCs are running 1 gbit max for ethernet, have a SSD that is connected to a 6gbit link and run connection lengths between 1 and 100 meters. TOSLINK is one of the few optical cables with consumer adoption and while most sound devices offer it, I don't know many people actually using it. Most audio signals from tvs just get carried via HDMI.
I'm using TOSlink with several old Chromecast Audios I refuse to let go! That's about it tho, everything else in my HT or near my PC is HDMI, DP, USB, SPIDF (coax), or BNC/XLR in some scarce instances.
The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above?
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form.
Why is the Peak Design Everyday Backpack so widely used? A snazzy design? Exceptional utility? A combination of both? After testing one, it's clear why this bag deserves every accolade it's received.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
Looking for the best gifts for photographer friends and family? Here are a dozen picks from stocking stuffers on up that will not only help put some more presents under the tree but also actually get used.
As the year comes to a close, we're looking back at the cameras that have clawed their way to the top of their respective categories (and our buying guides). These aren't the only cameras worth buying, but when you start here, you really can't go wrong.
Plenty of amazing cameras, lenses, accessories and other products came through our doors in 2023. After careful consideration, healthy debate, and a few heated arguments, we're proud to announce the winners of the 2023 DPReview Awards!
The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above?
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
Sony's gridline update adds up to four customizable grids to which users can add color codes and apply transparency masks. It also raises questions about the future of cameras and what it means for feature updates.
At last, people who don’t want to pay a premium for Apple’s Pro models can capture high-resolution 24MP and 48MP photos using the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus. Is the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens or the ability to capture Raw images worth the savings for photographers?
Kodak's Super 8 Camera is a hybrid of old and new: it shoots movies using Super 8 motion picture film but incorporates digital elements like a flip-out LCD screen and audio capture. Eight years after we first saw the camera at CES 2016, Kodak is finally bringing it to market.
In this supplement to his recently completed 10-part series on landscape photography, photographer Erez Marom explores how the compositional skills developed for capturing landscapes can be extended to other areas of photography.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
Sony, the Associated Press and 'Photo Mechanic' maker Camera Bits have run a month-long field-test to evaluate capture authentication and a subsequent workflow.
A color-accurate monitor is an essential piece of the digital creator's toolkit. In this guide, we'll go over everything you need to know about how color calibration actually works so you can understand the process and improve your workflow.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
It's that time of year again: When people get up way too early to rush out to big box stores and climb over each other to buy $99 TVs. We've saved you the trip, highlighting the best photo-related deals that can be ordered from the comfort of your own home.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
Sigma's latest 70-200mm F2.8 offering promises to blend solid build, reasonably light weight and impressive image quality into a relatively affordable package. See how it stacks up in our initial impressions.
The Sony a9 III is heralded as a revolutionary camera, but is all the hype warranted? DPReview's Richard Butler and Dale Baskin break down what's actually new and worth paying attention to.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
DJI's Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are two of the most popular drones on the market, but there are important differences between the two. In this article, we'll help figure out which of these two popular drones is right for you.
The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
The iPhone 15 Pro allows users to capture 48MP photos in HEIF or JPEG format in addition to Raw files, while new lens coatings claim to cut down lens flare. How do the cameras in Apple's latest flagship look in everyday circumstances? Check out our gallery to find out.
Global shutters, that can read all their pixels at exactly the same moment have been the valued by videographers for some time, but this approach has benefits for photographers, too.
We had an opportunity to shoot a pre-production a9 III camera with global shutter following Sony's announcement this week. This gallery includes images captured with the new 300mm F2.8 GM OSS telephoto lens and some high-speed flash photos.
The Sony a9 III is a ground-breaking full-frame mirrorless camera that brings global shutter to deliver unforeseen high-speed capture, flash sync and capabilities not seen before. We delve a little further into the a9III to find out what makes it tick.
Comments