A lot of photographers are nervous about cleaning their camera's sensors, but it doesn't have to be scary! Chris may border on overconfident with some of these methods, but by the end of this week's episode you'll have some tips and techniques for sensor maintenance (and witnessed the destruction of some previously lovely cameras).
A word of warning. I recently purchased cans of Dust-off - compressed air - from Costco thinking it would be a good way to blow dust of my XT4 sensor. Do not do this! Dust-off has a propellant which leaves an oily mark on the sensor. Help!
Isn't the US the country where you can sue for penalties if you don't get a warning about freshly brewed coffee that it's hot? Where you'd expect a warning not to microwave a cat for drying? Chris, how dare you give advice like that? Fire, Water!
If dust grains cannot be blown away, then vacuuming can be the solution. Simply take a new, dry drinking straw, put it close to the speck of dust and suck on it with your mouth. No need to touch the sensor!
I've used the Pentax O-ICK1 sensor cleaning kit for years. It's easy to use. On a number occasions I got spots on the sensor while changing lenses.
On one occasion in the the rain, (I shot a lot in the rain), I forgot to keep the camera front pointing downwards enough and a few rain drops got on the sensor. And in the city, the raindrops aren't that clean.
On a couple of another occasions I changed a lens while at the beach and some salty sea-spray must have gotten on to the sensor.
Visible Dust wet clean before any major day out takes about 5 mins just remember to buy the right liquid red top visible dust is for smears, blue and green for dust is fine. I learned that blowing on the sensor just after eating a BLT wasn’t good hence I had to RED to get the bacon off lol
Soap and water works well.... just kidding. I might have to try the flame thrower approach. Of course, then, a dirty sensor won't be a problem because there won't be a camera left to worry about.
Hi Great video and very informative. Sadly my camera too suffered from water ingress after using the toilet method to clean the sensor, off to buy some rice!
The section on "manual repairs," where Chris drills a hole in a camera, is pure farse. Yes, to tinker seriously with the innards of a fixed-lens camera is difficult and time consuming. But are there really any professionals who do this often enough, with such an assortment of cameras, that their work is both reliable and affordable? Any one-off job, whether involving cameras, plumbing, or automotives, can take hours or yield flawed results. Local and remote repair shop sensor cleaning jobs failed me in the past: same dust specs, no changes whatever. When I tried to clean an LX100 myself, I learned that the sensor mount components were very delicate and (after difficult reassembly) I got error messages. It turned out to be smarter to buy a used substitute with a low shutter count. Dust eventually appeared on its sensor too, but use of a vacuum cleaner enables partial removal, with less peril, but is only temporary.
Sensors are covered by a protective layer of glass. Cleaning that surface is not really any more complicated or frought with risk than cleaning a lens. The idea that you’d only switch lenses in a bathroom as a few have posted here is just goofy. Why the bathroom. Less dust from the shower ? Did you know that bathrooms have micro particles of feces floating around from flushing the toilet … eeewwuu! Or the need to send your camera in for professional cleaning - what ? Swabs do not just push dust aside. The particles generally adhere to the swabs. This is not rocket science even tho many people use a rocket blower. Ha ha. One of the good reasons to have an ILC is exactly because you can self clean the sensor. Had a number of Canon G series cameras early in the digital era and two of them essentially died because of dust or whatever on the sensors and they were not repairable.
I guess it's the same logic behind applying screen protectors in the bathroom with hot water running, trapping the dust from the air in steam. It sure works for screen protectors, but I'm less enthusiastic about the combination of steamy air and open camera.
This is correct, once I was at the sony store and they told me the LCD monitor was the thing to worry about, not the sensor. Much higher change of getting damaged since its outside and costly to repair
Surprised Chris didn't mention the vacuum method. It works for fixed-lens cameras, and I think it's the only at-home solution for fixed-lens camera. Well, it worked for me. Requires a strong vacuum cleaner with a small end nozzle to focus the suction. You place the nozzle at a junction of the lens barrel that moves in and out, then you need to cup your hands around the nozzle and around the lens to further focus the suction, then you may need to operate the lens such that it moves in an out while the vacuum is on. Removed a few spots of sensor dust from my LX100 after several attempts.
The vacuum cleaner approach improves if one first turns on the camera, so that the lens extends, removes the battery, and then uses the vacuum nosel coupled with a taped-on DIY extension cut from a firm plastic bottle with a diameter factionally wider than the lens. This increases the flow-through a lot. However, some dust can persist, particularly near the edges of the sensor. Meanwhile, to take apart and reassemble fixed lens cameras for a manual cleaning can require great dexterity, and the process can introduce or unsettle more dust than is removed. Shoot a photo of a white wall or bright sky at small aperture, and specks or blobs are still apt to appear.
My Rigid shop vac hose fit my RX100 perfectly, I had to apply the vacuum twice to remedy the situation and has been dust free since. Dust showing up on my FF camera raws is easy enough to deal with. The RX100 being more or less my point and shoot, images I do not put through post-production, it was aggravating to have dust show up in the images.
Dust will invade any camera with a zoom or focus feature where part of the lens extends or retracts. This will suck or expel air like a bellows. Over time, the fittings will loosen and become progressively permeable and dirty. The lens action can also suck in air through seams in the battery chamber and its dirty contents. Dust, pollen, other grit, and maybe even exfoliated skin specs eventually end up on the innards of the lens and on the sensor surface, fortified by electromagnetic attraction. Even some sealed cameras (like an old GoPro) will eventually feature sensor or lens dust that originates from internal part decomposition and vibrations associated with years of active use.
@John Koch exactly. I also experienced a spider in a lens (its corpse actually still is there) and I still don't know how it got there between the glass.
I would be shocked if Amazon doesn't use automatic price adjustment software that tracks trends and buying spikes. I doubt that B&H and Adorama are nearly as sophisticated.
60€ for a blow torch? A small canister of butane and a brass torch nozzle should not cost that much. That should suffice to incinerate an entire collection of cameras or even immolate the house and car. Be careful!
Have been using compressed dust off for years. Not a problem if you know how and far far more effective than the rather ridiculous rocket blower. I have one … a waste of money.
Guy in my town wanted 80 dollar to clean my two cameras for the weddingseason but won a big giftcard to a camera store so ordered myself a new camera and a cleaning kit so i can do it myself . Easy and alot cheaper
I know a guy just over the border from my place and whom pretends to be a 'professional sensor cleaner' in the Netherlands who asks 80 euros for a single camera and even differentiates between sensor sizes.
Full Frame and SMF are even more expensive.
I think such price is insane for an easy job that takes less than 15 minutes for a full clean.
Just use the right tools for the job and learn to do it yourselves. I have been cleaning my own cameras for a near 20 years now without any problems. Just be careful and don't be a fool using self made tools when you don't know what to use for it.
Oh no i didnt mean it was expensive and i have used him before. But with two cameras and the way i shoot it Quickly Adds up so its worth for me to just buy a set. Have to agree 80 bucks for pimpling some air on the sensor and doin some swabs are alot, dont thiink he pays more then 4-6 bucks for the tools
What I find more disturbing in his cleaning policy is that he doesn't take responsibility if things would go wrong. It is all written in the small letters of the agreement that nobody tends to read beforehand. To be honest I think he's a scam even though when people are content with the cleaning job he does.
I understand why people don't like to mess with sensor cleaning and let it have done for them. But at 80 euro's per camera I think that's too much for what it is. At 20 to 25 euros I think it is still a lot, but taking the time and gear needed in mind it is more close to a more realistic pricepoint.
In my opinion everybody needs to learn to clean the sensor of his own camera(s) and be less afraid of it. The more often you have done it, the less scary the wet cleaning of a sensor becomes.
You can do a professional camera clean for the fraction of the costs:
1. Buy yourself a bottle of Isopropanol Alcohol and a bottle of distilled water. If you look at the ingredients of a bottle of original sensor cleaning fluid you will see in the ingredients list that it contain of 45% to 65% Isopropyl alcohol, and the rest is diluted with distilled water.
2. Buy yourself a rubber spatula cut to the size of the sensor in your camera. Cut out two small triangles on the sides. This is where you put the small rubber band to hold a Photosolution's Pec Pad.
3. Enwrap the rubber tip of the spatula with a sheet of Photosolution's Pec Pad (cut to half size).
4. Use ONLY two to three drops of sensor cleaning fluid and drip it on your self made sensor swab (and which is softer and safer to use than the hard plastic spatulas in the kit you bought yourself normally).
5. Thank yourself for saving tons of money on sensor cleaning materials for a long time to come.
The dust removal system on my OMD is flawless. It was flawless on my E-1. Just returned from a mountain holibob and over 600 raw files, multiple lens changes, not a spec of dust. Can't say the same for my Leica, Canon and Sony cameras.
I've had the same experience with OMD and Pen but I wonder if luck isn't involved. I just had the sensor on my D700 cleaned for the first time and I don't think it even has a cleaning mechanism. Or maybe it's where you go. The D700 went to Cuba four times and no dust despite the nasty imitation gasoline they burn. But two days in Mexico City and it was ready for the vacuum cleaner.
I can confirm that. My E-1 never caught a speck of dust, so there was no need to clean the sensor. The same goes for E-M1 MkII. However as far as D610, D700, and 5D go, yes they do need cleaning on regular basis ...
A friend of mine from CERN swears by a method for those stubborn dust specks that uses transient black holes. The equipment for that is kind of expensive though, and rather tricky to take on a plane too.
Chris and Jordan, I'm rather disappointed that you didn't mention the classic vacuum cleaner method, which is amazing for day to day use. The best results are to be had with those industrial heavy duty vacuum cleaners. You just place the end of the pipe on the lens mount and do a quick run at full power. Afterwards, there is typically no dust left on the sensor, or in the camera. (electronics, remember, is often made out of silicon, which is also dust! exactly what you want to get rid of)
Gotta admit it, Chris, that gentle psycho impression was top notch! Haha... Wasn't it?
Actually, I think Chris and Jordan missed an opportunity to make a really helpful video. The attempted humour should have been restricted to the beginning. Interspersed throughout was just confusing to those who are nervous about cleaning sensors. Going by the sheer number of threads started by “what are these spots in my photos?”, followed up by replies like, “it’s dust, easy to remove from your sensor” to “take it to your camera shop and get it professionally cleaned” indicates how much confusion is already out there on this simply task.
I'm one of the people who didn't find this video (except for the intro) funny. Chris and Jordan definitely have a talent for comedy, but comedy is a tricky thing to pull off. During the TV writers' strike, The Daily Show was still funny, but not as consistently funny. It turns out that Jon Stewart could come up with 22 minutes of jokes four nights a week all by himself, but it takes an entire team of writers to tweak the script and weed out the duds to ensure that the jokes land consistently. I don't know why I didn't find this video funny, so I can't say what Chris and Jordan might have done differently.
In all seriousness, I wish you would have spent more time on dust on the sensor on a high end, non-interchangeable lens camera. Folks at KEH tell me, when I told them that the that the leica X2, which had dust on the sensor, was to be expected and get used to it. Also could you address what camera manufacturers could do in R & D to help with the dust on the sensor. If a Sony RX1 gets dust you'll have to replace the lens unit. So, manufactures should do more to endure no dust on their high end non interchangeable lens cameras.
I guess my point is, since "you have to send it in" manufacturers need to spend more time on doing everything they can to NOT allow dust to get on the sensor. The difference is on an interchangeable lens camera you can DO IT YOURSELF for almost no cost.
After the Rocket Blower, my Step 2 is an Arctic Butterfly brush. This does a great job on dust that isn't actually stuck but just held in place by static electricity. For more stubborn dust, my Step 3 is a Sensor Klear pen, which is basically a tiny Lens Pen with a triangular tip that's better at reaching into corners.
I haven't needed to do wet cleaning in about a decade, since I switched from DSLRs (which had a nasty habit of spraying mirror-box lubricant onto the sensors) to mirrorless cameras. I've NEVER needed to clean the sensors in the Panasonic Micro Four Thirds bodies I've used for 8+ years, but my Sony bodies need regular TLC with a Rocket Blower and occasionally the Arctic Butterfly.
I'm a timelapse photog (amongst other genres), so I need to clean my mirrorless and DSLR sensors before every shoot (it's arduous to remove spots from high res moving clips). I've gotten pretty good at it. I check before & after with an illuminated loupe, and I use a combo of blower, SensorKlear and, very rarely, handmade pecpad swabs with eclipse fluid. But, back when I was new at it, I used the "close the aperture point at the sky" method to see if there was dust (not as effective as a loupe), & I used exclusively pecpads & eclipse fluid (key: no rocket blower). Well, when I finally did get an illuminated loupe, I spotted a sensor-long scratch in one of my cameras! I must've dragged a tiny piece of sand along that sensor once. Interestingly, I never noticed any artefacts in my shots due to that scratch (and I checked carefully after I discovered it). Still, a harsh lesson: always use a blower first, and look very carefully (since then: hundreds of cleanings with no problems, phew).
Oh, and one time I met a war reporter/photog at an event I was shooting, and offered to clean their sensor (it was some pocketable micro 4/3 body, if I remember correctly). I've _never_ seen a sensor so dirty, it looked like the surface of a shed-prone dog's bed: endless dust, and actual _hairs_ that surely stuck out far enough to be bumped by the mirror. They must've only ever shot wide-open, phew.
@chasg, Thanks for sharing your experience and hard lessons learned. Your story about the war photog's dirty MFT sensor and how he must've shot wide open to not notice it brings up an interesting point. That can be considered a real advantage of small sensors - the ability to shoot in dusty environments without having to clean your sensor while still getting sufficient DOF.
I wouldn't put the Pentax sticky stuff nor the swipes. I tried them both with bad results, Just use the blower, and any dust still stuck use a brand new microfiber cleaning cloth and clean the sensor like you would clean a pair of glasses. any leant left can be easily cleaned with the blower.
the Ricoh cleaning stick is used by professional camera cleaning services around the world... it doesn't have residue it can leave if it's in good condition and you clean it using the sticky sheets.
I don’t have experience using the Pentax O-ICK1 cleaning kit but apparently Leica technical services in wetzlar factory does...Along with some kind of vacuum cleanner...unfortunaly the video is no longer available:
Ummm a microfibre cloth is likely to leave micro fingers behind. I’ve used the Pentax O-ICK1 on my Pentax cameras only a few times that it’s been necessary and it does a perfect job. It only requires the lightest touch to grab anything on the sensor. It’s not necessary to be as aggressive as Chris showed.
None of the digital interchangeable lens cameras I've owned over the last 16 years have been Sony, so I have had to own a vacuum cleaner but I've never had to clean a sensor. No doubt the day will come so, one question about the blower ball, how can I be sure there are no dust particles ---- inside the blower ball!!!! Indeed how do I know I'm not blowing the dust off the sensor, sucking it into the blower ball as it falls, then blowing it back onto the sensor, dooming myself to a modernised labour of Sisyphus?
I can't believe Chris didn't mention using Windex on the sensor for a wet clean. I think I am going to head out to the garage to make a mini squeegee for such a project. If any of you steal this idea and get a patent on it, I'll be mad.
I ran my smart phone through a heavy cycle of the washing machine. Surprisingly, it did power up after I let it dry for a couple of weeks. The phone part didn’t work. Neither did the camera, come to think of it. But interestingly the screen worked. Turns out that the colours were washed out!
I find having the dog lick it off works best. Dogs are very experienced licking things. Use smaller breeds for M43, and maybe something like a St Bernard for medium frame. If the dog expresses reluctance, using a a bit of peanut butter on the sensor will get the process started. Cheaper than buying one of Elon's flame throwers.
Sadly Tibetan Mastiff does not have a chance to appear as 10x8 large format is mostly film, but raise one in case someone breaks into your house and wants to grab all your family fotos away!
In my experience with Olympus gear, their IBIS based dust removal at power-on takes care of most dust. If there's something left even after a couple of off-on cycles, an air blower usually won't help, either, which means a wiper is called for. So if there's dust, I use a wiper.
While some companies just shake the sensor using the IBIS mechanism, the Olympus system is actually far more effective, as there is a separate round filter which is vibrated by its own mechanism at a much higher frequency, and with vastly more acceleration generated, far beyond what an IBIS system could do when moving an entire sensor.
Felt sense of H as always LoL ... But, for this clip, as a PRO camera hardware channel by DRPREVIEW, without putting "X" or disclaim Dpreview might get in trouble financially or legally when someone intentionally or un-intentionally follow the video.
I think it really depends on the expected results. Nowhere in the Flamethrower Procedure was it stated that the camera should continue to function. Just that the sensor was now free from dust.
I would occasionally clean the sensor of my old Olympus DSLR. When they switched to mirrorless m4/3 where the sensor is exposed most of the time, even when changing lenses, I was horrified. However, with the SSWF (whatever that means) dust reduction system, dust is a thing of the past. I don't even bother to check anymore. Before heading out to take pics, I'll give the sensor a quick burst of the rocket blower just in case and that's all.
Chris, I'm with ya buddy. Flamethrower all the way. Plus, after just one easy treatment you'll never have to worry about taking another crappy photo, you know, having your friends laugh at you and all that embarrassment. Because, simply, you will no longer have a camera! Brilliant!
For me, lens changes when shooting means a major drop in the creative flow. Im most successful with two cameras and no lens changes. This helps keeping the sensors clean too.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
Panasonic has announced the Lumix DC-S5 II and DC-S5 IIX, a pair of 24MP full-frame mirrorless cameras with phase-detection autofocus. We've taken a close look at the S5 II and discuss what the more video-focused S5 IIX will bring.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
According to Japanese financial publication Nikkei, Sony has moved nearly all of its camera production out of China and into Thailand, citing geopolitical tensions and supply chain diversification.
A pro chimes in with his long-term impressions of DJI's Mavic 3. While there were ups and downs, filmmaker José Fransisco Salgado found that in his use of the drone, firmware updates have made it better with every passing month.
Landscape photography has a very different set of requirements from other types of photography. We pick the best options at three different price ranges.
AI is here to stay, so we must prepare ourselves for its many consequences. We can use AI to make our lives easier, but it's also possible to use AI technology for more nefarious purposes, such as making stealing photos a simple one-click endeavor.
This DIY project uses an Adafruit board and $40 worth of other components to create a light meter and metadata capture device for any film photography camera.
Scientists at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia have used a transmitter with 'less power than a microwave' to produce the highest resolution images of the moon ever captured from Earth.
The tiny cameras, which weigh just 1.4g, fit inside the padding of a driver's helmet, offering viewers at home an eye-level perspective as F1 cars race through the corners of the world's most exciting race tracks. In 2023, all drivers will be required to wear the cameras.
The new ultrafast prime for Nikon Z-mount cameras is a re-worked version of Cosina's existing Voigtländer 50mm F1 Aspherical lens for Leica M-mount cameras.
There are plenty of hybrid cameras on the market, but often a user needs to choose between photo- or video-centric models in terms of features. Jason Hendardy explains why he would want to see shutter angle and 32-bit float audio as added features in cameras that highlight both photo and video functionalities.
SkyFi's new Earth Observation service is now fully operational, allowing users to order custom high-resolution satellite imagery of any location on Earth using a network of more than 80 satellites.
In some parts of the world, winter brings picturesque icy and snowy scenes. However, your drone's performance will be compromised in cold weather. Here are some tips for performing safe flights during the chilliest time of the year.
The winners of the Ocean Art Photo Competition 2022 have been announced, showcasing incredible sea-neries (see what we did there?) from around the globe.
Venus Optics has announced a quartet of new anamorphic cine lenses for Super35 cameras, the Proteus 2x series. The 2x anamorphic lenses promise ease of use, accessibility and high-end performance for enthusiast and professional video applications.
We've shot the new Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2R WR lens against the original 56mm F1.2R, to check whether we should switch the lens we use for our studio test scene or maintain consistency.
Nature photographer Erez Marom continues his series about landscape composition by discussing the multifaceted role played by the sky in a landscape image.
The NONS SL660 is an Instax Square instant camera with an interchangeable lens design. It's made of CNC-milled aluminum alloy, has an SLR-style viewfinder, and retails for a $600. We've gone hands-on to see what it's like to shoot with.
Recently, DJI made Waypoints available for their Mavic 3 series of drones, bringing a formerly high-end feature to the masses. We'll look at what this flight mode is and why you should use it.
Astrophotographer Bray Falls was asked to help verify the discovery of the Andromeda Oxygen arc. He describes his process for verification, the equipment he used and where astronomers should point their telescopes next.
OM Digital Solutions has released firmware updates for the following cameras to add compatibility support for its new M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO lens: OM-D E-M1 Mark II, E-M1 Mark III, E-M5 Mark III, E-M1X, and OM-5.
Micro Four Thirds has 'size benefits, and a shooting experience that can’t be matched by a smartphone,' says the director of Panasonic's camera business, as we talked about the system's future, the role of video, the adoption of phase detection and the role his dog played in the development of the S5 II.
Today's modern cameras are armed with sophisticated autofocusing systems. They can focus anywhere in the frame, track multiple subjects, and switch on the fly. But what good are these advanced tools if you can't see where the camera is even focusing? It's time for the autofocus box to upgrade from its single-color status.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 II is a powerful mid-range full-frame stills and video mirrorless camera that introduces on-sensor phase detection, 6K 'open gate' video, LUTs for still mode and more. We put the camera through its paces during a hands-on trial run in the real world.
The new FE Sony 20-70mm F4 G has an extremely versatile zoom range, but how do the pictures look? Check out these full resolution 60 megapixel captures!
Sony has confirmed it’s developing a high-end 300mm F2.8 telephoto lens for its E-mount camera systems. The lens will be a part of the company’s high-end G Master lens lineup.
Comments