Adobe is working on a new tool for Photoshop CC called the "Curvature Pen Tool," and earlier today the software maker released this sneak peek video to show you how it will work.
The tool—which will be added to "an upcoming release of Photoshop CC" according to Photoshop Product Manager Meredith Payne Stotzner—is very simple to use. It works by creating curved lines between points in your selection as you create a path. Each click adds a new point, clicking a point twice turns it into a sharp corner, and once your path is complete you can add, move and toggle points between rounded and sharp edges without ever changing to another tool.
Watch the sneak peek above to see how Stotzner uses the tool, first to create a custom shape, and then to create a perfect selection of a window frame.
Still not sure what its' doing... adding a default amount of curve to every click, which you... what, cannot adjust? Can only adjust by turning the curve into a corner? Can adjust using existing pen tools?
I mean, if I happen to need a curve that closely matches the amount of curvature in a perfect circle, like that window arch, great. But 90% of the time I don't, I need some odd amount of curve, like a gentle winding road or oval ellipse.
I guess people complained the pen was hard to use? I always found it straightforward.
I'm glad to see this isn't another "content-aware" tool that requires a lot of fixing when it makes questionable decisions, thus negating any time savings.
You probably never missed it because you didn't know it was possible. While you're waiting for "Ps to complete and task" you should go look at a new computer...
I understand, but it's not actually that bad in coherence mode; it's *almost* like a native mac application. The only obvious differences are visual - the fonts used in palette-windows etc. For all intents and purposes, you use the Mac OS.
I have quite a few old pieces of software that have been abandoned on the mac platform due to incompatibilities with newer OS updates; and have only been kept alive by running the Windows 7 version.
Whenever PS CC announces a new tool we can expect the following comments: 1. The tool is crap. 2. The tool is available elsewhere at a better price 3. The tool has been available elsewhere and works better 4. This is the just the sort of bone Adobe throws our way to justify its outrageous subscription fees.
I cannot comment on number one since I haven't tried the tool. I cannot comment on comments numbers 2-4 because I don't use other software.
I can comment on number four, the longest-standing complaint. I just looked over my history of using PS. I cannot trace it back to my first purchases of PS 5 but I did find the following regarding upgrades I purchased for later versions. 1. $217 in 3/09 for CS4 2. $221 in 3/10 for CS5 3. $221 in 8/12 for CS6
When I started my subscription the price per month with tax was $10.59, or $127.08 a year. That is a fair price, consistent with earlier expenditures and frankly for a much better deal that includes LR and some Cloud storage.
@Tom > the longest-standing complaint The longest standing complaint isn't the subscription fee per se. But that the subscription is locking you in with no control whatsoever what the subscription fee will be in the future. Esp. after all perpetual licensed copies ceased to work.
E.g., the photographer subscription is a special, possibly limited-time offer with today $20 being the normal subscription for a single CC program ...
If you Google "millenials love subscriptions" you'll find that younger people actually prefer paying for a service every month, indefinitely. Why tie up cash with ownership when you can rent? Um, ok. As they say, you can't buy beer; you can only rent it.
Falconeyes: I understand what you are saying and, no doubt, the fee could rise at any time. That said, I have been paying the $9,99 plus tax rate ($10.59 in PA) for at least two years now so my costs are consistent with outright purchases in the past and I do believe I get more for my money.
You paid $221 for CS 5 to 6 over a 2 and a half year span, you're now paying $127 yearly which works out to $317 over the same period.
I don't disagree that it's similar but there's two important differences, the first being the fixed cost upgrade always becomes better value over time if you don't upgrade and ever since Adobe dumped its subscription policy on us it feels like Photoshop hasn't changed as much as it did in the past.
The latter point may be wrong but the subscription model encourages Adobe to give us just enough to stick around while a whole new version had to deliver enough improvements to warrant the upgrade cost.
I think that difference will become more apparent over time.
I have no idea where you purchased your upgrades. I never paid more than 150$, did not have to upgrade every year and could skip an upgrade once in a while.
When I brake it down to monthly payments I paid no more than 5$ per month.
Currently using CS6, refusing the subscription and evaluating alternatives because the latest cameras are not being supported anymore
Most creative assets work with CS3 or later (cf. envato market). No need for CC. Newer raw formats are easily supported via LR6 with PS/CS integration.
I have to correct something in my original post, a correction which makes my points even more compelling. I looked up the details of those purchases (I keep all records) and those prices I paid included not only PhotoShop and upgrades but also (not every year) InDesign, Pagemaker and Acrobat Pro.
This tool is virtually useless unless it provides adjustment handles on the Bezier points. As usual, Adobe demonstrates a very particular case that works (just like they did with Content Aware stuff) but don't bother polishing the tool before release. The lazy Adobe Cash Cow just keeps getting fatter.
Affinity Photo, and now Pixelmator Pro. While CC has become an almost static target (per this sneak preview) easy to hit. Air is getting thinner for Adobe every month. As it appears they lost all their innovative force in the engineering department.
If only. After five years of being stuck on CS6 [last paid for version] my organisation is about to take a gulp and go with cc. As design professionals we don't have an awful lot of choice. We need to be industry standard to be compatible with any external agency we might use and Adobe have a monopoly.
It's sort of a relief we will be able to get up to speed with the rest of the industry, but I resent [even if it's not my own money] going on this extortion. Actually as I work for a public body, it is my tax money.
Adobe have calculated that some Photoshop only users will drift away or pirate. By charging huge amounts to the design industry they are still quids in.
It's mature software, so there weren't compelling reasons to upgrade often even when Adobe had that incentive. Now they have people locked in at a cost that would represent an annual upgrade fee whether there are improvements or not.
I used to love Adobe as a software company. Now they make Microsoft look like saints.
I see Adobe prevail and be profitable in the mid term. Because of their strong market position. However, it will be easy for Adobe to take that money for granted. It won't be the first market leader we see going into obsolescence within the software industry.
So, it may be a good strategy for any design company to grow a second leg early. Especially as all the innovation happens there. I have seen amazing results from some AI start ups which mimic artistic styles in their editing software, or automate parts of portrait retouching etc. At some moment in time, Adobe software will be left behind. As Adobe Premiere struggles with 4k editing, it can already be seen today.
Chris2210 : I can totally relate to your situation as I am also stuck with CS6 and now bought a few Affinity licenses for my small organization.
In some other fields there are very high quality free or even open source software are starting to appear (look at Black Magic Design's offering). But unfortunately there is no real competition (sans Affinity ) to challenge Adobe.
I prefer the Affinity approach: a single pen tool but you can quickly change the mode: Pen (bezier curvers), smart (curvature pen tool), polygon or line without interrupting the line. Those mode can be used to modify an existing path too.
Affinity Photo has most impressive selection tools that is there. The effectiveness and easiness to do complex selections for hair/fur (against busy background) or trees branches etc is just fun as results are so great.
And then when the same algorithms is applied with other tools like inpainting brushtool or content aware filling. It is amazing how complex elements the inpainting brush can manipulate with a perfect results, meaning not a stone in a greenfield but a flagpole going over building windows with lot of small window tiles, or person against brick wall.
Doing the complex selections is just painting around that window shape and basically it is done.
I'm sure some people will appreciate this new feature. Personally, I would much prefer if they got the speed/lag issues of LR sorted! LR doesn't appear to be keeping pace with the new technology and the larger RAW files. It's painfully slow on a 2017 iMac.
I agree. But with clever holding and releasing of a few keys I have been doing all of this with Breezier for years. Is this the best improvement they can do, that is my question.
This seems to me like a very minor upgrade. Does it deserve so much publicity and fanfare? I do not think so. I have been CC subscriber for a few year, the price is going up every year, not much improvements to show for....
You are basically paying for a licensing/usage fee, not for upgrades. Adobe could literally offer no upgrades, and still charge you. It's like you are renting an apartment. You are paying for the right to live there, but you shouldn't be expecting upgrades to your apartment every few months or every year. So in the case of CC, upgrades are like an added bonus. Yes, it sucks for those who are used to buying software outright, but that's the new business model.
That is not what was promissed to us when this new business model started. We we promissed that the regular and steady cashflow will allow Adobe to put more resources into developing, improving and advancing their software better than under the old regime of buying the license outright.
@T3 > but that's the new business model that's the business model some large software companies try to impose on us. We, the market, can still decline their "offer", even if they try to enforce it (like Adobe does). The more who decline it, the sooner this crazy software rental hype will disappear.
I am more than happy with CS6 and LR6, even on newest OS.
I have CS6, but ... unfortunately the newest ACR for CS6 do not support my camera, K-1. And I guess it never will. Before CC, new ACR releases were compatible with all Photoshop versions. Not so any more. Maybe there is a technical reason. But, I rather believe it to be a marketing decision. Am I angry? No, of course not. Is it annoying. Sure!
I use photoshop professionally for hours every week and the pen tool is my least favorite because its a bit tedious and time consuming on complex shapes and that adds up. Any improvement in this area will be enjoyed by people like me.
Wow this is what your high priced could subscription buys you now, trivial updates every now and then. How about some real improvements, like and entirely new RAW engine and NR engine, LR hasn't changed in nearly 2 years since it went CC based.
Also Bridge is still the slowest crap image browser I've ever come across, is it coded in VB.
Lightroom needs a major update, it not just feels old, its slow, tethering is awful, default camera calibration is lackluster, clarity slider is ugly, skin does not look as good as Capture 1 out of the box, but I'm still hanging on cause I can't get capture 1 to properly display my photos at smaller browser sizes. Finish them Adobe.
Sounds like good old-fashioned splines to me. The existing pen tool uses Bezier curves. With a spline, you just put in constraint points - it's essentially like putting nails in a board, then bending a springy ruler around the nails, except without the nasty real-world physics stuff getting in the way like it did with drawing pins and spline rulers on a drawing board in the old days (been there, did that). It's a lot more intuitive than a Bezier curve, but you need more constraint points when the curves get especially tight or complex.
The Fujifilm X-T4 brings image stabilization, faster shooting and a bigger battery to the X-T series. It's not without its shortcomings but we found it to be an excellent stills and video shooter.
With its unusual form factor can the Tourbox aid the editing process? Will its price and variety of tactile controls appeal to photo and video editors who would like to streamline their workflow?
The Panasonic FZ1000 II is a worthy successor to the company's first large-sensor, long-zoom bridge camera, and a value-conscious rival to the popular Sony RX10-series. It's just as fast as its predecessor but produces nicer JPEGs, has significantly improved controls and interface, and more.
The DJI Mavic Air 2 is a Goldilocks drone. It's not the biggest or the smallest model out there, but it delivers just the right balance of size and features.
Exposure Software's latest Exposure X5 app is a surprisingly fast, feature-packed and affordable alternative to Adobe's Lightroom – with no subscription required.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
Believe it or not, there are still people that like to print out their photos and create photo books to send gifts to family members. We looked at five popular photo printing services and have chosen the best.
Video features have become an important factor to many photographers when choosing a new camera. Read on to find out which cameras we think are best for the videophile.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
If you want a camera that you can pick up and use without having to page through the manual first, then this guide is for you. We've selected seven cameras ranging from compacts to full-frame, all of which are easy to operate.
Definitely a case of 'evolution rather than revolution', the new look is designed to help users recognize icons and logos more quickly in the different environments in which they appear
What does two years of progress look like, for Fujifilm's most video-centric models? Is the X-T4 worth the upgrade from the X-H1, or is now the time to bag yourself a bargain?
Adobe has released a new video series titled In a Lightroom Minute that breaks down tips and tricks for Lightroom CC and Lightroom Mobile in 60 seconds (give or take a few).
The Sony ZV-1 is a modified version of Sony's RX100 series aimed at vloggers and video enthusiasts. Does Sony have a winner? Chris and Jordan vlog their way through an episode to find out.
The live event is over, but the full replay is available until June 6 and they're still accepting donations — 100% of which go to Global Giving's Coronavirus Global Relief Fund and other regional charities.
Nikon's financial results don't fall far from the updated forecast shared earlier this month and highlight just how unsure the entire industry is about the future due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Thinking about buying your first film camera? Great news, there's plenty of options out there! Here are 12 things to keep in mind when picking out your perfect analog companion.
The teaser doesn't share much information but based on the visuals provided, it appears to be a mid-range zoom roughly the same size as its 28-75mm F2.8 lens.
In early March, it was reported the ITC ruled in Autel's favor over a long-standing patent battle. DJI, and its legal team, have issued a response declaring victory on their end.
Check out our first sample gallery from the Sony ZV-1, shot by our team at DPReview TV. Their full review of the ZV-1 is coming to a YouTube channel near you soon!
A few sophisticated features were touted with the release of DJI's latest consumer-grade drone, the Mavic Air 2, including the ability to shoot 8K Hyperlapse video. But you may encounter problems trying to watch that footage on your computer.
Ricoh has officially released the HD Pentax-D FA* 85mm F1.4 ED SDM AW lens for its full-frame DSLRs. This fast, weather-sealed portrait prime will ship in mid-June for $1899.
The new structure pays a percentage of the sale price based on the level the contributor is at—a level that's based on the number of sales made, with that count resetting on the first day of the year.
The Windows program works with nine of Fujifilm's X Series and GFX System medium format cameras and turns the video into a feed that can be used with video conferencing software.
If you're into aerial photography, you've likely heard of From Where I Drone. Dirk Dallas talks to us about what makes an exceptional photo along with his new book, Eyes Over the World.
Sony just announced the ZV-1, a modified version of the RX100 series aimed specifically at vloggers. We take a look at six important features you may have missed from the announcement.
Sony has announced the ZV-1, which it calls a 'content creator' camera. It's essentially the hardware of an RX100 VA redesigned to make vlogging and facing-the-camera shooting easier.
We got our hands on Sony's new Xperia 1 Mark II smartphone which features impressive Eye AF tracking, super-fast burst shooting and a triple-camera array. Check out our initial samples.
The Xperia 1 II will be available to pre-order on June 1 for $1,200 with the first units set to ship out on July 24. If you get in early, Sony will even toss in an added bonus.
When most people think of Casio, the first things that pop into their minds are calculator watches and keyboards. But, as we explore in this article, the company was well ahead of its time creating features that are standard on modern cameras.
Unconventional and unsightly? Very much so. Effective? Most certainly. These six DIY smartphone rigs won't win any design awards, but they get the job done.
Title fight! In one corner we have the new Olympus E-M1 Mark III. In the other is the Panasonic G9 – two years old, but sporting an impressive mid-life firmware update. Find out who wins the battle for Micro Four Thirds supremacy!
Comments