What if you were swimming in gold and could buy any camera that you wanted? Chris and Jordan sat down to talk about what cameras they would buy if money was no object. Some special guests chime-in to share what they'd pick, as well.
What's your dream camera? Tell us in the comments below.
What about for the next one of these you could try choosing a versatile one bag kit? A lot of readers are amateurs, who may have a favourite subject but will embrace any opportunity that comes along because they enjoy photography. For example on a walk you could take scenery, birds in flight and on branches, insects and flowers. You might do some portraits of family and friends. Maybe architecture or go to a sports event, or try a slow shutter speed image of the sea, etc. The kit needs to fit in a backpack or a messenger bag so you can put it in the car and also be practical to carry around. Is that an interesting challenge?
Dream Camera: a true X-T3 successor: Hopefully an "X-T5" - keep the form factor (inclusive screen!) - better specs (electronic, EVF, etc..) - Better build and weather-sealing - Flash wireless commander integrated in the body - Better Wifi - Slightly bigger and gripper buttons and rear/front wheels for use with gloves. - new sensor with base ISO 100 but keep a same megapixel count. 28 mpx would be perfect - firmware features like live raw conversion, full-screen mode in EVF, faster delete, direct playback.. - Better battery grip with similar layout as the body. - The lock switch on the grip should match the lock menu. - a robust IBIS (eventually).
It still baffles me that Oly has never made more small weather sealed primes (or any really, beyond the 60/2.8 macro), when they've been making one of the smallest well sealed body lines for almost a decade now...
I'm pretty sure M4/3 has lost a bunch of users to Fuji's f2 WR line over that alone, not a lot of systems are well served in this regard tbh and at least M4/3 now has a couple non-Oly options (PL25 II, 56/1.4, etc), but there's still no small sealed wides (outside the Pro fisheye).
My most used M4/3 body now isn't weather sealed so I've stopped daydreaming about it, but I hope someone makes it happen for the system eventually. For the price, the 12/2 and 17/1.8 really ought to have been weather sealed but those small metal primes are the least likely to get updated.
Money no object, but size and weight is an object. That makes my Olympus M43 kit with smaller prime and zoom lenses, Fujifilm X100 (both T and V in my bag), and Panasonic LX100ii the clear winners for me. In the end, it's the photographer, not the gear, that delivers the results.
if sizes and weight matters, MFT cameras are still no alternative - I got 2.8/12-40 mm and 4.0/12-100 mm - in this range it is ok - but smartphones will soon take over. So MFT will only keep a handling benefit.
But in longer range, MFT is a clear looser, even with 4.0/300 mm or 4.5/150-400 mm - to heavy and to expensive against a Sony A1 or A7RIV with 6.3/200-600 mm and 2 stops less noise with full frame.
If I had had the money I'd have totally no use for (unlikely), I'd probably get a new fisheye lens, but that's it.
I'm also fearful for the 80D after shooting a half marathon in the driving rain today so maybe the second 1D Mark IV would be great to have for shoots like this -- although on the other hand, the 80D's articulating screen came in very, very handy today. Please mate, don't let a little rain (only 1/2 of monthly average...) kill you...
I will never understand this concept being continually pushed how upgrading your equipment is essentially pointless. I will never understand this basic presumption by so many that folks aren't always trying to improve their photography skills. So yes, better equipment does matter. GEAR does matter. Besides, this article is about YOUR dream Camera Kit. Not about whom can or can't do what with it.
That hardly means it has to be the latest an greatest from whomever, but you certainly aren't going to see the vast majority of those folks running around with an Polaroid Instant Film Camera an producing an wide range of quality work. Gear matters, always has, always will. But again, this isn't about that, it's just about buying without any limitations. Your Dream Camera Kit. So if you are fine with something from 30 years ago, that hardly means somebody else should be too.
The problem is when the thinking on it gets out of balance. For many who read a a lot of gear related stuff, it seems as if the gear side of the equation gets too much emphasis. Esp. with all of the latest cameras being so capable.
Then of course the marketing from camera companies also tends to highlight the gear, naturally. Now if you go to their sites, many like Canon and Nikon have a lot of great tips on the skill of photography.
So it's a complex equation, different for each person and context.
TRU, I have never had any problem with what folks want to Use be it old or new. However, I do have an huge problem with folks that continually want to play this game of as if Gear doesn't matter, it just the photographer.
That's exactly the narrative some want to push. But at the same time, some of those same folks are the ones saying no Camera Brand in 2021 should make an Camera with less than 24MP an how that isn't really enough. I noticed at the Olympics that PROs aren't there with an bunch of Point an Shoots cameras. Why, because Gear matters along with skills. This is an article about folks stating their Dream Camera Setup, not about what matters most, skill an or camera gear.
If it’s about kit available now, I guess I’d have to go for the Hubble Space Telescope. Money is burning a hole in my pocket and I just can’t wait for the release of the James Webb Space Telescope. I do so hate 30 year refresh cycles ;-)
Frankly the cost of photographic equipment is such that even a fairy basic mid to top range kit, Say a Canon R6 and set of three lenses is 6K+ for many that is fantasy
Exactly.. as a Canon shooter with my “old” but faithful 6D Mk I and my 30 yr old EF lenses .. I feel disqualified from this never ending technology race
+1. Just ignore it. Photography is way much more, than just -always- the latest & greatest. Better gear does not make one a better photographer. The 6D is fine.
Investing $6k into a hobby isn't that much, the question is how much you've invested into photo opportunities. If you spent all your money on gear, you're doing it wrong. Unless you really, really like to photograph your back yard.
@attomole: why not? it‘s about the dream camera regardless of price, which does not have to be the most expensive brand, biggest sensor or fastest lenses
Nikon F6, upgraded by Nikon to shoot with E-lenses, 28mm AF-S f/1.4E, 58mm AF-S f/1.4 and 105mm AF-S f/1.4E. In addition, unlimited supply, including quality processing, of Kodak Tri-X, Portra 160, 400 and 800, Ilford Pan-F 50 and Adox CMS-20.
Maybe throw in a D850 too, just in case I want to post a photo on Facebook.
--
But truth be told, I'm actually very happy with my two Panasonic GX8 bodies and assorted lenses. And when shooting film, I have this Nikon F80 that I paid $100 for and an old 85mm lens that sounds like a freight train when focusing, but still produces beautiful portraits.
And this makes me think back to when I was just starting out in photography, and saying to myself "if had that shiny new $8K Canon 1Ds Mark II and those SIXTEEN point SEVEN megapixels...I'd never want more!"
Fuji XT4 like body with the Sony A7R IV 60 megapixel Bayer sensor sensor but with Fuji's color science and pixel shift. And the modified Fujicron line of lenses for this body 23/2, 35/2, 50/2 and 16/2.8. The ability to use existing FX lenses with 26 megapixel in crop mode on this body. The GFX line of bodies and lenses is way bigger and heavier.
If that dream kit had to be my daily driver? A1 plus Sony 16-35mm f/4, Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, and Sony 200-600mm G, along with some smaller lenses.
If I could just order from anything in the menu, no limits and no questions asked? I’d love the full systems for the Nikon SP, Alpaflex, Rectaflex, Contarex, Contax Aria… the list is long, and they’re almost all for film 😬
My money is no object camera kit is a mix. A 500CM with a 6x6 digital back and a full set of T* lenses along with an SWC body. That would be for landscape. My sports and action camera is already out there: a couple of D6 bodies with lenses I also can't afford. 17-35, 24-70, 70-200, 180-400, 400, 600, 800.
Lenses have been and still are undergoing revolutionary changes due to two factors: vastly increased lens-design software capability and computer numerically-controlled polishing. The appearance of all those lenses with aspheric elements, Fresnel elements, fluorite elements, etc. are a direct consequence of this.
I started with a dream of perfect camera, ending up with 7 cameras and 21 lenses, plus an empty wallet.. It must be a wrong dream, I should have dreamt a perfect photo.
I broke myself by owning too many cameras. I decided to buy a camera from every major manufacturer 2 years ago and test them against each other - specifically for portrait skin tones.
I now find photography to be boring. Or at least not as much fun as when I had 1 camera and 1 lens and shot with it for something like 5 years.
Often there's too much emphasis on specs and not enough on what makes the gear enjoyable.
I think reviewers should focus on more on usability and just sheer enjoyment factor. Sure it's subjective but reviewers give subjective opinions all of the time in other areas, like movies, music, theatre, food, cars, etc. That's what reviews are for...to get people to think about certain things, not just to add up specs on paper.
Very true. You can change camera profiles (Nikon) to fit pretty much any preference for color and tone. Handling, balance and ease of use should be more important to us photographers.
Every camera and lens on the market today produces beautiful images in the right hands. Capturing natural sunlight as the real challenge. Buying camera equipment not difficult unless you keep switching brands not realizing the magic of photography. Generally speaking 1/250 @f8.0 ISO 100 gets me there.
@saltydogstudios As for skin tones, I guess any camera is good enough as a baseline if set in "portrait" mode/style and taken in RAW (maybe add a custom ColorChecker profile if you want extra precision). And most things can be adjusted in post if desired. I am primarily a Nikon shooter, but had a few Canon cameras as well, and used other brands occasionally. The best improvement in portraits color wise came for me not from the camera, but from the software - I realized default settings of Capture One are bringing me closer to the look I desire than the one in Lightroom. But your mileage can vary, as such things as color in portraits are pretty subjective.
So, did you actually manage to try a camera from every major manufacturer? What conclusions did you arrive to from this experience?
@saltydogstudios Actually, I think maybe my take is not completely right. I am reading your blog right now, and it gets me to overthink what I knew about color in portraits :-)
" I think reviewers should focus on more on usability and just sheer enjoyment factor. That's what reviews are for...to get people to think about certain things, not just to add up specs on paper. " -TRU
I think DPR does a lot of that actually, and they often get raked over the coals for it by all sides.
I'm actually keenly aware of where the bodies I own falter in usability because of both DPR and my own experience in handling different brands, some people have a higher level of tolerance for that if it comes as a trade-off for greater customization or some technical benefit, some don't, nothing wrong with either stance tbh.
It's definitely the reviewers that go thru a lot more gear that are best equipped to call it all out.
@wjan - I agree. Capture One is more designed around getting good skin tones than Lightroom. Though I still think each camera has subtle differences that just profiling with a colorchecker can't eliminate.
As for the results of my shootout + general thoughts, check out my blog archive.
My dream kit would include the world before the “war on terror” made the world a “safer” place, when I used to be able to travel easily in far flung destinations across Africa and Asia without the expectation that nasty things might happen.
No problem. Canon R5 with a Ninja V+. Best AF today video and stills Best 8K video (RAW and 10 bit 4:2:2) with unlimited shooting with Ninja V+ Best IBIS in a FF camera (Nikon is neck and neck) Best 4K video (2:1 oversampled) also unlimited shooting with Ninja V. IMHO, best JPEG and RAW colors (Fujifilm is neck and neck, and yes RAW color is not equal) Best selection of manufacturer lenses (Nikon comes close). Tied with Nikon for Best ergonomic.
The Ninja V+ also gives me an easy to read 5 inch screen.
If the money was really, REALLY no object, I'd buy Sony (the company... well, at least their imaging and sensor divisions), and have them design and build the camera and lenses to my specs ;-)
If you’re going to wish for a camera that hasn’t been released yet, you may as well wish for a lens that hasn’t been released yet and pick the 24-70mm GM II.
Until the chip issue gets solved, pretty clear sony is gonna give priority to high end models. Like A1/A9ii. They do not even have enough to make more 7s3.
Impossible to sell 74 now. Sales would be too much for them to make enough units.
My dream camera is the Nikon DL 18-50. So pity Nikon canceled it. I even keep an old B&H paper catalog from 2016 where this camera was actually listed for $846.95.
@wats0n I have sold my Nikon V1 set few years ago as it was clear the system will not be supported anymore. But I recently picked up a tiny J5 with wonderful 32mm f/1.2 and 18mm f/1.8 lenses, and they bring me so much joy! There is no other system which is comparable in compactness.
I already have my dream camera, and it's a Canon R5, and it works perfectly with all my old EF lenses. Plus my new RF lenses are incredibly performant.
I dream of a 26MP Medium Format camera with a fixed 18-85mm f/1.8 lens, a 4.0" 1920x1280@72fps HDR 1000nit articulating touch-screen and a good 4.0MP @ 120fps EVF.
Stills: 6224 x 4176 3:2 26MP 14bit losslessly-compressed DNG RAW stills, capture rate of 16fps (220 RAW frame buffer).
Video: Up to UHDp120 10bit 4:2:2 HDR 720Mbps, 16 stops DR - sampled from full-width of the sensor (6224 x 3501) in all resolutions and frame-rates. Includes all the video-assist features, and anamorphic support.
6.5 stops stabilized sensor.
AF that's better than the Sony A1, and still works fast in -5 EV.
Body & fixed lens perfectly matched in factory. Weather-sealed body & lens, with good button layout & sturdy dials. Good body materials and design - like the Leica SL2-S.
Iris, zoom, focus dials on lens + built-in ND.
2x CFexpress card slots (2x 1TB card supplied in the box).
2x 30Whr batteries + dual charger (supplied in the box)
My dream camera would likely be the Sony A2 (soon to be released ) with the 24 1.4. I find that it is actually possible to have too much gear. It gets in the way of grabbing and working more quickly and creatively with what one has.
At least you are sitting at the right spot, in 20.000 years Northern Europe and North America will be covered with ice again, and African deserts areas will be green again. I wish the "developed" countries would be more supportive of Africa, they definitely will need Africa's help in the (not so far) future. The gulf stream already becomes weaker and weaker. Nice continent BTW.
When you look at the winter temperatures in the US Midwest, you get an idea what winter temperatures locations like GB and Scandia get without gulf stream. We don't have to wait that long. My point is simply to be more supportive of developing areas like Africa. Our global warming 1.5 degee targets conflicts with their need for infrastructure for a whole continent. We dream of new cameras, they dream of the schools, hospitals, streets and bridges, we already have. It's a nice continent and I hope their wishes, also for fancy new cameras, become true one day.
Africa will be a gigantic market for consumer products in the future. It's a nice continent and I hope their wishes, also for fancy new cameras, become true one day.
Having time spans of 20.000 years in mind, the difference between a D3100 and any other camera mentioned here is negligible. 20.000 years ago people might have dreamed of tools for cave painting ... like the benefit of an ivory handle. What difference does this make for today's photography? What difference will today's camera options make in 20.000 years from now?
Africa's biggest problem is lack of recognition from creative brands and camera manufacturers such as canon, Nikon, adobe etc. I feel like people here have the money to buy even the most expensive of them all but there is no convincing tongue out there to make such financially stable friends invest in us! Africans are as informed as any other people around the world, we use the same internet! but it just baffles me that i cant get a subscription model tailored to my environment or a camera priced right due to a visible store from canon not my local shipper who is going to charge me double the money!
You are so right. At the end of the day it is the eye of the photographer that matters. Still nice to dream about these things. While writing this, I was just wondering what lenses do you have for your D3100. I use Nikon myself. I do have a few Nikon items gathering dust that could be usefull for you. So lets talk about that. Best wishes Arjen Veldt
@dannyshots I have a Tokina 12-24 f4 that I don't use anymore. And there is an older 80 -200 f2,8 that I lend to someone. But he might not use it anymore. Could ask him if you are interested. By the way, do you have a website or webpage with your work? Also a D300s with an 16 - 85mm is an option. Have worked with it for years but in 2014 switched to an D800.
@arjendt everything there is just gold! how do i get it? I am a ugandan, and btw am just a casual photographer who really is passionate about photography ... i havent setup a website to brand myself since i havent reached that level.
Maybe send me a couple of examples to the mail adress I mentioned? I basicly could send you stuff, but like to know a little bit more to whom I 'd be it sending to.
@dmanthree I understand you as well as Eric very well. I used to manual focus a dslr for animals and even kept birds in flight with a high hit rate in focus but switched to af when I got a camera and lens which could do it better than I could. But nowadays my eyes don't allow it anymore so I couldn't even do it if I wanted. Having said that with half the age, oh well...
Eric Hensel, yeah I know, it's photogaphy forum an all... but have you tried some modern medicine? sometimes they bring back vision to almost blind people. It's not 100% possible but pretty possible in many ocassions
jzet...Yes I have. Cataract replacement surgery in both eyes has helped a lot, but the ravages of time remain. I remain enthusiastic about my photography, though.
We're all different, in a good way. My dream camera is what I have... a Panasonic G9 (I have two) with a nice assortment of (MFT) lenses. Do I find the lack of phase detect AF a limitation? No. Panansonic's DFD CD AF is spot on accurate and very rapid FOR STILLS. I shoot sports (horse polo) and I have never felt under-gunned by the AF. How about low light and MFT? Hasn't been an issue for me with fast Sigma lenses and Panasonic's amazing IBIS. I stopped using tripods. The only area where I feel a little compromised by the MFT crop is my inability to get razor thin depth of field. In every other way, this three year old design is such a remarkably capable camera that, even though I have the resources, I don't have the desire to migrate, unless it's to a "G10" :-) Jack
I just want the opportunity to travel wherever I want and stay for as long as I want. Then my pictures will be more interesting, regardless of the gear used ;)
I’d want something that doesn’t quite exist… an Olympus OM-D E-M5 mkVI that has Sony A1-level AF, a 24mp sensor with a base ISO of 64, 6K video with internal 10-bit O-log recording at up to 120fps with a built-in electronic VND filter, and of course a 20mm Panasonic 1.7 pancake with a much faster, quieter AF motor and no breathing. That camera could keep me happy for a long, long time.
I'm with Jordan, if money is no object why would you limit yourself to one camera? Heck I already have a few and I'm working within the constraints of a budget.
Right tool for the right job or occasion, no single camera covers it all. If I was swimming in cash I might add a Q2 to my FF & M4/3 kits, for starters. I'd probably spend a lot more on lenses than on bodies too...
I actually tried one time to input my dream list of bodies and lenses into an on-line store shopping cart just out of curiosity. I got too tired half-way through, but the total price at that point was just around 100k. I thought that was pretty reasonable for a dream list.
Heh I've spent maybe a tenth of that over time and across two systems and I'm still pretty happy, tho if I had a few hundred grand more of disposable income I'd surely double or triple what I've spent with a Q2, an A1, and a tele or two I wouldn't use nearly enough to justify it's price. ;P
I'm about where you are. It's a day dream list. Like I day dream about traveling to different galaxies and planets. TBH, even now, back to reality, I have gear that I don't use often enough to justify.
If money were no object, I would take the Nikon 120-300 f/2.8, both extenders, the EOS R5 and pay Metabones to develop a full working Nikon F to EOS R adapter with AF ;-)
Edit: Ah I almost forgot about the memory cards. I would get a bunch of Pro Grade Cobalt 650GB CFExpress cards, some Sony tough SF-G SD cards and a bunch of HDDs (non HE for archival purposes and larger HE drives for current storage).
Yes, somethink like that :-) I would prefer something like following a pride of lions for a year or two. WIth safaris you usually have a few days here a couple of days there some single days on other locations and thats it. Thats seeing everything but also seeing nothing at the same time.
1D Mark IV was and still is an excellent camera... Last of its kind (apsh), I'd keep it! With new AI software (Topaz), you can even crop and print big :)
I too have what I believe is the perfect setup for me. I've used many cameras over the years but as I approach 70 and don't print big anymore, I'm going small.
So what's my 'dream' outfit? 2 cameras. First, a Sony RX100 VII that can go anywhere, has an ok EVF, amazing autofocus for the grandkids and birds in my neighborhood and is small enough to go anywhere. Only a 1" sensor, but ok for online posting and occasional A4 or photobook usage. Second camera: Leica Q2 (not monochrome) for when I want to get fancy and given 47MP, I can crop the heck out of its images if need be. Fantastic EVF and ergonomics. I can always convert to monochrome if I want, and the low light performance is good enough.
For that matter, I find myself using my iPhone 11 quite a lot. Pretty darn good if only you could see the screen in bright sunlight.
It says Olympus on the front, but the OM System OM-1 is about the future, not the past. It may still produce 20MP files, but a quad-pixel AF Stacked CMOS sensor, 50 fps shooting with full AF and genuine, IP rated, weather sealing show OM Digital Solutions' ambition. See what we thought.
DJI's Mini series has always been a great entry-level option for beginners, hobbyists, or those willing to sacrifice features for size. But with its newest model, the Mini 3 Pro, DJI promises to bring pro features to its most compact model. Does it succeed?
Sony has just announced its updated 24-70mm F2.8 GM II and there are a host of impressive upgrades. We took this new lens around a very soggy downtown Calgary to see how it performs.
The Nikon Z9 is one of the best cameras we've ever tested. But is it the best of the best? Chris and Jordan have been testing the Z9 with the new 2.0 firmware for a while, and they have the answers.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Chris and Jordan are out of the office this week, so we're taking a trip in the wayback machine to feature a classic episode of DPRTV: a review of the EOS R, Canon's first full-frame mirrorless camera.
Last week, we featured Markus Hofstätter's scanner rebuild, which saw him spend three months bringing back to life a massive scanner to better digitize his collection of large format photographs. This week, we're taking a look at the results, kicked off by a beautifully detailed 30cm x 40cm collodion wet plate portrait.
The lenses lack autofocus and image stabilization, but offer a fast maximum aperture in an all-metal body that provides a roughly 50mm full-frame equivalent focal length on Fujifilm and Sony APS-C cameras.
Apple has responded to an open letter published last month, wherein more than 100 individuals in the entertainment industry asked Apple to improve the development and promotion of Final Cut Pro.
Venus Optics has launched its Indiegogo campaign for its new Nanomorph lenses, revealing additional details about the world’s smallest anamorphic lenses.
Most smartphones these days offer great-looking video and make vlogging very easy, but there are always accessories that can help to make your footage, and you, look even better
The WG-80 remains largely unchanged from the WG-70, but it now has a front LED ring light that's twice as bright as its predecessor. Aside from that, the 16MP CMOS sensor and 28-140mm full-frame equivalent lens stays the same.
Astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti is aboard the International Space Station for a six-month mission. She and the other astronauts aboard the ISS witnessed the recent full lunar eclipse, and Cristoforetti captured amazing photos of the spectacular event.
Vivo has announced the global launch of its flagship X80 Pro device, which features an impressive quadruple-camera array on the rear, headlined by a main 50MP custom Samsung GNV sensor.
ON1 has announced the newest update to its ON1 Photo RAW 2022 all-in-one photo editor. Version 2022.5 integrates Resize AI into the editor, plus it includes improved noise reduction and Sky Swap AI. The update also includes new camera support.
Many cameras have a distinct sound. MIOPS partnered with German sound artist Kuntay Seferoglu to harness the diversity of camera shutter sounds and create the MIOPS Camera Symphony.
Panasonic's new 9mm F1.7 lens promises to deliver top performance in a pint-sized package. Does it raise the bar for ultra-wide angle lenses in the Micro Four Thirds system? Check out our sample gallery to find out.
Despite most units still not shipping for a few weeks, DJI has released a firmware update for its DJI Fly app that allows for activation of its new Mini 3 Pro drone, which will unlock the full feature set for the first ‘Pro’ sub-250g drone from the company.
It says Olympus on the front, but the OM System OM-1 is about the future, not the past. It may still produce 20MP files, but a quad-pixel AF Stacked CMOS sensor, 50 fps shooting with full AF and genuine, IP rated, weather sealing show OM Digital Solutions' ambition. See what we thought.
The app is developed by cinematographer and colorist Zak Ray, who's brought together over 1,000 lenses and 150 cameras into a comprehensive and interactive database app for planning out your shoots.
The leaked renderings and information suggests this new FPV drone will come in at around 500g (1.1lbs) and feature a CineWhoop-style design with protected propellers for safely flying in tight spaces.
The lens, which was previously avaialble for Sony E-mount, is fully manual, but chipped to provide support for focus confirmation and in-body image stabilization with compatible Nikon Z-mount camera systems. Cosina says the lens is set to go on sale next month, June 2022.
The total lunar eclipse will start tonight in most hemispheres and extend through midnight into early Monday morning. Here are some tips on where to view it and capture this rare event.
Is the GH6 the best hybrid camera there is? Jordan has been shooting DPReview TV with the Panasonic GH6 for months, so he has plenty of experience to back up his strong opinions.
The Sony a7 IV includes a new screen reader assistive feature that makes the camera more accessible for the many people who struggle with vision impairment and loss. It's a great first step in making photography and digital cameras more accessible.
Markus Hofstätter Is no stranger to massive DIY photo projects, but his latest one took three months to complete and resulted in bringing back to life a massive scanner that he now uses to scan his ultra-large format photographs.
Representation matters. Google is working to improve skin tone representation within its products and services and improve its AI technology to better understand images of people of all skin tones.
As we work towards our GH6 review, we've taken a closer look at some of the video options by shooting clips to highlight some of the compression options, picture profiles, image stabilization modes, the dynamic range boost mode, and low light performance.
By leveraging hardware acceleration, Adobe has managed to speed up 10-bit 4:2:0 HEVC video export times by 10x on macOS computers and Windows computers running AMD GPUs. Adobe has also sped up smart rendering, added HDR proxies and more.
Comments