Pentax K-x Review
Our Dynamic Range measurement system involves shooting a calibrated Stouffer Step Wedge (13 stops total range) which is backlit using a daylight balanced lamp (98 CRI). A single shot of this produces a gray scale wedge from (the cameras) black to clipped white (example below). Each step of the scale is equivalent to 1/3 EV (a third of a stop), we select one step as 'middle gray' and measure outwards to define the dynamic range. Hence there are 'two sides' to our results, the amount of shadow range (below middle gray) and the amount of highlight range (above middle gray).
To most people highlight range is the first thing they think about when talking about dynamic range, that is the amount of highlight detail the camera can capture before it clips to white. Shadow range is more complicated; in our test we stop measuring values below middle gray as soon as the luminance value drops below our defined 'black point' (about 2% luminance) or the signal-to-noise ratio drops below a predefined value (where shadow detail would be swamped by noise), whichever comes first.
Custom Image Modes
Like on previous Pentax DSLRs the Bright, Natural, Portrait, Landscape, Vibrant, and Monochrome image modes use essentially the same curve and therefore produce the same amount of dynamic range. The Muted setting uses a more linear, less contrasty curve but all the settings clip highlights at the same point.
The K-x features contrast settings (as a part of the custom image parameters) from -4 to +4. As you would expect the -4 setting produces a flatter tone curve while the +4 setting results in a more extreme s-curve. Most of the custom image settings use a contrast setting of either 0 or +1, while the Muted setting uses -3 to generate a small extra amount of shadow dynamic range.
Expanded Dynamic Range Function
Like the K-7 the K-x features both shadow and highlight expansion which can be applied to the camera's JPEG output. With Highlight correction activated ISO 200 becomes the minimum sensitivity setting. With highlight expansion turned on the tone curve is flatter in the highlights and produces just under an extra stop of highlight range.
With our dynamic range test setup we could not trigger the shadow expansion functionality and therefore we can unfortunately not provide any measurements for this feature.
ISO Sensitivity and Dynamic Range
The K-x's highlight range remains relatively constant across the sensitivity range. However, the measured shadow range decreases as you increase ISO. This is mainly due to increased noise and noise reduction smearing.
|Sensitivity||Shadow range||Highlight range||Usable range|
|ISO 100||-5.7 EV||2.9 EV||8.6 EV|
|ISO 200||-5.7 EV||3.2 EV||8.9 EV|
|ISO 400||-6.0 EV||3.0 EV||9.0 EV|
|ISO 800||-5.7 EV||3.0 EV||8.7 EV|
|ISO 1600||-4.7 EV||3.0 EV||7.7 EV|
|ISO 3200||-4.0 EV||2.9 EV||6.9 EV|
|ISO 6400||-3.4 EV||3.1 EV||6.5 EV|
|ISO 12800||-2.4 EV||3.3 EV||5.7 EV|
Dynamic Range compared
At it default settings the K-x's overall dynamic range is more or less in line with the competition. However, while it overtakes the EOS 500D and just squeezes past the Nikon D5000 in terms of total dynamic range it comes last in this comparison in terms of highlight dynamic range which, to many photographers, is more important than shadow range. The E-620 achieves the largest dynamic range but does so by applying technology similar to Highlight Expansion on the Pentax by default. Therefore, if you activate Highlight Expansion, the K-x beats the Olympus in this respect.
|Camera (base ISO)||
|Pentax K-x||-5.7 EV||3.2 EV||8.9 EV|
|Canon EOS 500D||-5.0 EV||3.4 EV||8.4 EV|
|Nikon D5000||-4.8 EV||4.0 EV||8.8 EV|
|Olympus E-620||-5.3 EV||3.9 EV||9.2 EV|
The wedges below are created by our measurement system from the values read from the step wedge, the red lines indicate approximate shadow and highlight range (the dotted line indicating middle gray).
There is usually slightly more dynamic range to be obtained from RAW capture compared to in camera JPEGs (thanks to the use of a consumer-friendly tone curve in the JPEG conversion). There is typically around 1 EV (one stop) or so of extra information available at the highlight end in RAW files. The application of some negative digital exposure compensation when converting such files can recover detail lost to over-exposure. As with previous reviews we settled on Adobe Camera RAW for conversion to retrieve the maximum dynamic range from our test shots.
Adobe Camera RAW's default is fairly contrasty and, as expected, produces less dynamic range than the out-of-camera JPEG. The best result we could achieve in ACR by applying some negative digital exposure compensation, reducing contrast and increasing brightness is 9.9 EV of which just over half a stop (0.6 EV) is additional highlight range.
- ACR Default: Exp. 0.0 EV, Blacks 5, Contrast +25, Brightness 50, Curve Medium
- ACR Best: Exposure -1.1 EV, Blacks 1, Brightness 80, Contrast -50, Curve Linear
|ACR Default||7.2 EV|
|ACR 'Best'||9.9 EV|
These measurements are in line with what we found in real world use. The K-x has a fairly pronounced tendency to clip highlights and over exposed parts of the image are usually not recoverable at all or produce false color information when negative digital exposure compensation is applied in a RAW converter.
In the first example an area of the image (the sky and gable of the building) is quite heavily over exposed. Reducing the exposure by 2.5 stops in Adobe ACR recovered only a very small amount of detail on the building and most of that recovered detail has turned gray. The second sample shot is less extreme and while some, but not all, detail has been recovered, again some of the color information has been lost.
|Adobe Camera RAW default conversion||Adobe Camera RAW with -2.5 EV digital comp.|
|Adobe Camera RAW default conversion||Adobe Camera RAW with -1.0 EV digital comp.|
- 16 Photographic tests (Noise)
- 17 Photographic tests (DR)
- 18 Photographic tests
- 19 In-camera effects
- 20 Movie Mode
- 21 Compared to
- 22 Compared to (JPEG)
- 23 Compared to (JPEG)
- 24 Compared to (RAW)
- 25 Compared to (RAW)
- 26 Compared to (Higher ISO)
- 27 Compared to (Resolution)
- 28 Compared to (Resolution)
- 29 Conclusion
- 30 Samples
Jan 17, 2011
Dec 23, 2009
Sep 17, 2009
Dec 21, 2012