Pentax K-x Review
ISO Sensitivity / Noise levelsISO equivalence on a digital camera is the ability to increase the sensitivity of the sensor. This works by turning up the "volume" (gain) on the sensor's signal amplifiers (remember the sensor is an analogue device). By amplifying the signal you also amplify the noise which becomes more visible at higher ISO's. Many modern cameras also employ noise reduction and / or sharpness reduction at higher sensitivities.
To measure noise levels we take a sequence of images of a GretagMacBeth ColorChecker chart (controlled artificial daylight lighting). The exposure is matched to the ISO (i.e. ISO 200, 1/200 sec for consistency of exposure between cameras). The image sequence is run through our own proprietary noise measurement tool (version 1.5 in this review). Click here for more information. Room temperature is approximately 22°C (~72°F), simulated daylight lighting.
Pentax K-x vs. Canon EOS 500D vs. Nikon D5000 vs Olympus E-620
- Pentax K-x: Pentax 50 mm F1.4 lens, Manual Exposure, Manual WB,
Default Parameters (Bright), High ISO NR default (Medium), JPEG Large / Premium
- Canon EOS 500D: Canon 50 mm F1.4 lens, Aperture Priority, Manual WB,
Default Parameters, Standard Picture Style, NR Standard, JPEG Large / Fine
- Nikon D5000: Nikkor 50 mm F1.4G lens, Aperture Priority, Manual WB,
Default Parameters. Standard Picture Controls, Active D-Lighting Off, NR Normal, JPEG Large / Fine
- Olympus E-620: Olympus 50 mm F2.0 Macro lens, Aperture Priority, Manual WB,
Default Parameters, Normal Picture Mode, Gradation Normal, Noise Filter Normal, JPEG Large / Fine
|Pentax K-x||Canon EOS 500D||Nikon D5000||Olympus E-620|
As usual in our ISO-noise comparisons the differences between the contenders are pretty marginal up to ISO 800. From ISO 800 onwards the cameras' varying noise characteristics become more visible. The Pentax K-x does a very impressive job up to the highest sensitivities, balancing noise reduction and the retention of fine detail very well. Its output shows slightly more luminance noise (grain) than the Nikon D5000 but in turn blurs visibly less detail at higher sensitivities. The K-x's detail retention is better than the Canon's as well. The latter also shows noticeably more chroma noise.
At higher sensitivities the K-x shows a little more luminance noise than the Nikon and a similar amount to the EOS 500D. However, noticeably more detail is retained and the Pentax's results look visibly sharper. All in all the K-x's JPEG engine is doing a very decent job. Surprisingly at high ISOs the camera is a lot better than its bigger brother, the K-7, and is one of the currently best performing APS-C cameras in low light.
The graphs below don't quite show what we have seen in the sample crops above. In numerical terms the K-x, EOS 500D and D5000 are not far off from each other (the Nikon has the lowest measured noise levels) but what we cannot see in the graph is the extra detail that is being retained by the K-x's clever noise reduction algorithms. The Olympus E-420 is by far the 'noisiest' camera in this comparison.
Finally let's take a look a the K-x's RAW output next to the competition. Removing any in-camera noise reduction and processing the images using Adobe Camera Raw (V5.6 Beta in this case, all NR set to 0) gives us the nearest thing to a 'level playing field' for assessing the relative noise levels of the four cameras' sensors.
With noise reduction turned off we get a more accurate idea of how noisy these sensors are and the image looks slightly different to what we've seen above in the JPEG section of this page. In the RAW comparison the K-x and Nikon D5000 are quite close in terms of both noise and detail (although the Pentax output is better by a small margin). That's not a surprise as both cameras are built around if not the same a very similar sensor (it appears the Pentax is using a weaker AA-filter though). The Canon and Olympus are both showing significantly larger amounts of chroma and luminance noise.
|Pentax K-x RAW||Canon EOS 500D RAW||Nikon D5000 RAW||Olympus E-620 RAW|
Raw Noise graphs
Here the graphs confirm what we can see in the sample crops. At higher sensitivities the Pentax K-x produces the cleanest RAW files. The Canon and Olympus are significantly noisier than the Nikon and Pentax.
- 16 Photographic tests (Noise)
- 17 Photographic tests (DR)
- 18 Photographic tests
- 19 In-camera effects
- 20 Movie Mode
- 21 Compared to
- 22 Compared to (JPEG)
- 23 Compared to (JPEG)
- 24 Compared to (RAW)
- 25 Compared to (RAW)
- 26 Compared to (Higher ISO)
- 27 Compared to (Resolution)
- 28 Compared to (Resolution)
- 29 Conclusion
- 30 Samples
Jan 17, 2011
Dec 23, 2009
Sep 17, 2009
Dec 21, 2012
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Flower in flower by atdigit|
from Random Items Challenge 26
|Surface tension by atdigit|
from Right in the middle
|A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff|
from Show us SCHOOL!