Pentax K-r Review
The format of this review has been slightly shortened as the Pentax K-r is operationally similar and identical in terms of output to the Pentax K-x that we reviewed in December 2009. We tested to confirm the image quality is identical, then concentrated the review on the differences between the two cameras. To learn everything about the K-r we recommend reading not only this review but also the full review of the Pentax K-x.
The K-r was announced in September 2010 and slots into the Pentax line-up between the entry-level K-x and the enthusiast models K-7 and K-5. Visually it is much closer to the K-x but a look under the hood reveals that the new model has been improved over the K-x in various areas. Most notably the K-r shows the active focus point in the viewfinder when the shutter button is half-pressed. The lack of this feature was one of our main points of criticism of the K-x and K-m (this is also almost certainly the reason why the K-r's prism is slightly larger than the K-x's).
Like the K-x the K-r captures its images and 720p video footage on a 12.4 sensor, but like on Pentax's semi-pro models the output and menus can be viewed on a 3.0 inch LCD screen with 921k dot resolution. Additionally the K-r offers, after the K-5, the second widest ISO range (100-25600 in extended mode) and second fastest continuous shooting (6.0 fps) of all current Pentax DSLRs. Compared to the K-r the new features also include an IR simple interface (wireless data transfer to compatible devices), a cross processing mode and a Night Scene HDR mode. For those photographers who cannot decide if they prefer AA batteries or a proprietary rechargeable battery as their camera's source of power the K-r offers both options. It comes with a rechargeable battery as standard, but AA batteries can be used with the help of an optional adapter.
Apart from the dual-battery feature the Pentax K-r doesn't really offer anything totally new or out of the ordinary, but the specification sheet does look quite strong for a camera at its price point, and makes it look (at least on paper) like a more than viable alternative to some of the competing models from larger manufacturers.
Mar 5, 2014
Mar 3, 2014
Mar 11, 2011
Jan 31, 2013
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4