Pentax DA 16-45mm 1:4 ED/AL review
We’ve been quite impressed with this lens when using it in the field, and the studio tests show why. The resolution results may not appear wonderful - the lens isn't all that sharp at 16mm, and the corners are soft wide open at all focal lengths - but this is offset by excellent characteristics in other areas, with little in the way of chromatic aberration, falloff or barrel distortion. This lens is, in fact, an excellent example of why absolute sharpness is not always the Holy Grail of optical design.
|Sharpness||Decidedly indifferent at 16mm, where it needs to be stopped down to F11 for best results, the lens improves markedly at longer focal lengths, and is at its best around 28mm. Image quality improves significantly on stopping down , with F8 and F11 the sweet spot; at smaller apertures diffraction takes its toll, as usual. Fortunately apertures smaller than F22 aren't available.|
|Chromatic Aberration||A fairly respectable performance here; Pentax have generally limited chromatic aberration to the least problematic blue/yellow type. As always the effect is most pronounced at wideangle, where the red-cyan component is sufficiently large as to be visually intrusive; at 28mm and above there's little to worry about.|
|Falloff||This is an area where the 16-45 really shines. Due perhaps to the generous front element dimensions and unambitious zoom range, you’ll struggle to see any perceptible falloff (i.e. beyond 1 stop) except wide open at 16mm. Well done Pentax.|
|Distortion||Distortion is (as always) most pronounced at wideangle, but with a mere 1% barrel at 16mm, this is unusually well-corrected for a wideangle zoom; an impressive performance indeed. As usual, the distortion isn't 'pure' barrel, but instead a more complex 'wave' type, with re-correction towards the corners. At 20mm the lens is almost perfectly corrected, but at longer focal lengths it shows distinct pincushion distortion, maxing out at -1.2% at 45mm.|
Specific image quality issues
Overall chromatic aberration is fairly well controlled, but is (as usual) most problematic at wide angle. At 16-20mm, green/magenta CA can become intrusive towards the edge of the frame (see example below). At longer focal lengths, our studio tests show clear blue/yellow fringing, but in real-world shooting this turns out to be essentially a non-issue; it certainly doesn't have the destructive visual impact of red/cyan or green/magenta fringing.
|16mm, F8.0||100% crop|
Portait Format Softness
One clear issue with our sample was extreme softness at the edge of the frame when shooting at wide angle and in portrait format, especially with the lens angled sharply upwards (perhaps not a common shooting situation, but distinctly noticeable in some architectural shots). We can only speculate that this could be a decentring phenomenon due to the play in the lens barrel when fully extended at 16mm.
|16mm, F5.6||100% crop|
|16mm, F5.6||100% crop|
With its unusual ‘reverse zoom’ design, this lens shows severe shadowing of the built-in flash at wide angle settings. The effect will be dependent upon the specific camera body used, and how far the flash lifts above the lens axis; with the K10D, the manual states that ‘vignetting may occur when the focal length is shorter than 28mm, or when the focal length is 28mm and the shooting distance less than 1m’. Our own testing shows these to be reasonable, although somewhat conservative guidelines.
Jan 28, 2008
Jan 26, 2011
Jan 26, 2011
Jan 20, 2011
|I am an Elephant by Bibix|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 5, E
|Mossy forest panorama by Jill Hancock|
from Your point of view
|Ship Moon and Stars by LJJohnston|
from For creative newbies only..