Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Review
Performance & Photo Quality
Like most Panasonic cameras, the DMC-FZ200 is a solid performer. You'll do very little waiting when using the FZ200, making it a great choice for everyday photography of demanding subjects like kids, and events. The table below sums up its performance in a number of areas:
|Timing||Measured Performance||How it Compares|
|Startup||1.0 sec||Above average|
|0.1 - 0.3 secs (W)
0.5 - 1.0 secs (T)
|~ 1 sec||Average|
|Shutter lag||Not noticeable||Above Average|
(JPEG, no flash)
|~ 1 sec||Above average|
(RAW+JPEG, no flash)
|~ 1 sec||Above average|
|~ 2 sec||Above average|
There are a whopping six different burst modes on the DMC-FZ200. Full resolution burst modes include 2 and 5.5 frames/second (with continuous AF) or 12 frames/sec with the focus and exposure locked on the first shot. If you want to go even faster, there are 40 and 60 fps options, though the resolution is lowered to 2.5 and 5 Megapixel, respectively. There's also a flash burst mode, which takes five flash photos in a row at around 1.6 frames/second, albeit at 3 Megapixel.
Let's see if the FZ200 was able to reach its promised speeds at the two most interesting burst speeds:
|Image quality||5.5 fps w/AF||12 fps|
|RAW + Large/Fine JPEG||10 shots @ 5.6 fps||11 shots @ 12.5 fps|
|RAW||11 shots @ 6.0 fps||11 shots @ 12.5 fps|
|Large/Fine JPEG||16 shots @ 6.0 fps||12 shots @ 12.3 fps|
|Tested with a SanDisk UHS-I SDHC card|
As you can see, the FZ200 performed better than Panasonic's claims, which isn't something that I encounter very often! You can fire off a decent number of shots before the buffer fills up. When it does, it'll keep shooting at a slower rate (at 2 and 5.5 fps) or stop entirely (12 fps). It takes about 8-10 seconds for the camera to flush the buffer after taking a burst, especially if RAW images are involved.
The FZ200 accepts the same DMW-BLC12 lithium-ion battery that was used by the DMC-GH2 mirrorless camera. This battery packs 8.6 Wh of energy into its plastic shell, which is pretty good in this class. Here's how that translates into battery life:
|Canon PowerShot SX50 HS||315 shots||NB-10L|
|Fuji FinePix HS30EXR||600 shots||NP-W126|
|Nikon Coolpix P510||240 shots||EN-EL5|
|Olympus SP-820UZ HS||N/A||4 x AA|
|Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200||540 shots||DMW-BLC12|
|Pentax X-5||500 shots *||4 x AA|
|Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V||450 shots||NP-FH50|
* With NiMH rechargeable batteries
The Panasonic DMC-FZ200 has excellent battery life by CIPA figures, second only to the Fujifilm HS30EXR in its current field of competitors. Super zooms are among the only cameras out there that still accomodate AA batteries, though the FZ200 isn't one of them. An extra DMW-BLC12 will set you back around $48.
F2.8 Constant-aperture Zoom Lens
Having a constant aperture of F2.8 means that the FZ200 is considerably more versatile in marginal light and/or at the long end of its 25-600mm (equivalent) zoom lens than the FZ150, and indeed its competitors, too. In effect, it means that you can select higher shutter speeds, and lower ISO sensitivity settings - both of which will ensure better sharpness and critical image quality at the furthest extent of the camera's zoom. Here's a quick example, showing the FZ200 alongside its predecessor the FZ150. We set both cameras to their maximum apertures, at 600mm (equivalent) and set the same shutter speed of 160sec. We set ISO sensitivity to automatic.
|FZ150 - F5.2, 160sec, ISO 400 (600mm)||100% Crop|
|FZ200 - F2.8, 160sec, ISO 100 (600mm)||100% Crop|
With its maximum aperture of F2.8, the FZ200 can manage an exposure at ISO 100. But as you can see, to ensure good exposure, the FZ150 has no choice but to increase the ISO to 400, which has introduced more noise, and lead to lower resolution. In automatic exposure modes, both cameras will try to keep ISO sensitivity down as low as possible for this reason, but the FZ200 has the advantage of that wider maximum aperture, meaning that shutter speeds can be higher, placing less workload on the image stabilization system and giving you a better chance of getting sharp images.
|This shot was taken in aperture priority mode, at F6.3, at a focal length of 34mm equivalent.|
Now it's time to see how the FZ200 performed in our studio ISO test. Since these photos are taken under consistent lighting, you can compare the results with those from other cameras I've reviewed over the years. Keep in mind that the crops only show a small portion of the test scene, so view the full size images too. I've opened up the full ISO range for this test, so here's how the FZ200 performed from ISO 100 to 6400:
|ISO 100||ISO 200||ISO 400||ISO 800||ISO 1600||ISO 3200||ISO 6400|
The ISO 100 to 400 crops are nearly identical, with very little noise present. Noise becomes more obvious at ISO 800, but it's still quite usable for mid-sized and perhaps larger prints. When we reach ISO 1600 it's time to put on the brakes, as details are starting to get smudged away. ISO 3200 has pretty strong detail loss, and the ISO 6400 (High) setting is disastrous.
If you compare the test shots above with those from last year's DMC-FZ150, you'll find that the FZ200 captures a tiny bit more detail and is slightly sharper.
|This shot was taken in full manual mode, at F4, at a focal length of 121mm equivalent.|
As you can see, the San Francisco skyline is all decked out in orange, in support of the Giants baseball team in the playoffs. The FZ200 did an admirable job here, with sharp buildings and not too much highlight clipping (except on the building on the far left, which all cameras seem to blow out). Unlike Panasonic cameras of recent years, there isn't a strong brown/yellow color cast here. Noise and some mottling from noise reduction is noticeable here at ISO 100, though that's pretty standard for a camera in this class. Purple fringing levels are relatively low. Note that while I shot this scene using manual controls, you can do just as well using Intelligent Auto or one of the scene modes.
Now we're going to use that same night scene to see how the FZ200 performs as its sensitivity increases:
|ISO 100||ISO 200||ISO 400||ISO 800||ISO 1600||ISO 3200|
There isn't a huge difference between the ISO 100 and 200 crops. We start to see some detail loss at ISO 400, and that trend continues at ISO 800. I'd make either of those your stopping point, at least if you're shooting JPEGs. The buildings really start to fade away at ISO 1600 and 3200, so I'd pass on those. I did not shoot the night scene at the reduced-resolution ISO 6400 (H) setting, and you can probably see why.
The DMC-FZ200 handled our macro test subject quite well. The subject has average sharpness, and colors are quite vibrant. If you look really closely in a few places you might spot a little detail smudging, but it's not enough to concern me.
The FZ200 can be just 1 cm away from your subject at wide-angle (and 1 meter away at full telephoto), though remember to flip the focus mode switch on the side of the camera first! If you want to get about three times closer at the 4X - 24X zoom position, then you may want to check out the close-up conversion lens mentioned in the accessory section of the review.
Like all Panasonic cameras, the DMC-FZ200 takes a two-pronged approach to reducing redeye. First, it'll fire the flash a few times (before the photo is taken) to shrink your subject's pupils, which occasionally works. If any redeye remains after the photo is taken, the camera will digitally remove it automatically.
|As with the FZ150 before it, I found moderate levels of redeye in my flash photos on the FZ200. Since there's no way to remove this annoyance in playback mode, you'll have to remove it on your Mac or PC.|
Distortion (wideangle 25mm equivalent)
Panasonic performs automatic distortion reduction when you take a JPEG image, which is why there's very little "curve" in our test chart. I did not find vignetting (dark corners) or corner/edge blurring to be a problem in the test chart, or in the real world.
Overall Image Quality
Overall I am generally pleased with the photo quality on the Lumix DMC-FZ200. My biggest complaints relatedto highlight clipping and noise levels that are slightly above average. In the exposure department, the FZ200 didn't require a lot of fiddling with the exposure compensation. That said, it loves to clip highlights, so you may want to shoot RAW (which should allow you to pull back some detail) or use the HDR feature when that issue arises. I have no complaints about color -- the FZ200 produced saturated colors in a variety of lighting situations.
Photos are generally sharp, though a few times I felt that things could've been a bit sharper -- and that's where the Intelligent Resolution feature comes in (remember, it's off by default in the P/A/S/M modes that I shoot in). I do feel that the FZ200's images are a slightly noisy at the base ISO of 100. That said, the camera doesn't smear fine details like previous models did. It's kind of a balancing act, and I think I'd rather have a little grain in my photos than something resembling a watercolor painting. Purple fringing popped up here and there, but it was generally not a major issue.
Don't just take my word for all this, though. Have a look at our extensive photo gallery and see if the DMC-FZ200's image quality meets your expectations!
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Race by mdbinasif|
from Your City - Kids Play
|Altaussee Austria by IFRPilot|
|Sunrise at Mono Lake by ed rader|
from My Best Photo of the Week