Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review
Our latest test scene is designed to simulate both daylight and low-light shooting. Pressing the 'lighting' buttons at the top of the widget allows you to switch between the two. The daylight scene is shot with manually set white balance, but the camera is left in its Auto setting for the low-light tests to show how the camera's JPEGs look under artificial light. Any 'keep warm tone' options are left at their default setting.
The low light scene Raws are processed to demonstrate the capability of cameras in low-light shooting situations. Noise reduction is minimized and the white balance is neutralized to reveal blue channel noise. The black level is lifted to prevent noise being hidden by clipping. A standardized amount of sharpening is applied in Photoshop.
Here we're comparing the E-M10 to the Fujifilm X-M1, which bears a highly capable APS-C X-Trans chip. We'd expect it to out-resolve the Four Thirds E-M10,and the E-M10 appears to try and bridge the gap by applying slightly . The story is the same moving up to as well as comparing at the same ISO to another APS-C competitor,
The differences between the Micro Four Thirds E-M10 and its bigger-sensor competitors starts to become more obvious aroundwhen artifacts become more apparent, seen here in the cheekbones and eyebrows. The D5300's JPEG also gives a nicer reproduction of skin tone in this example, though suggests there's enough information captured to do more with the E-M10's file in post-processing. At 6400 and to the upper ISO limit, the E-M10 , and shows perhaps slightly more noise in its Raw files as compared to a
Inthe E-M10 and Panasonic GM1 look even in terms of detail, with the former displaying a warmer default auto white balance under tungsten lighting. The higher-res does better in terms of resolution as the E-M10 shows some colorful moire.
Atthe E-M10 struggles in lower light as it attempts to smooth out noise and sharpen remaining detail. It holds its own quite well against the at ISO 3200, but the X-M1 does a bit better at though at the two look about even. At its highest sensitivity the E-M10's JPEGs look comparable to the , displaying less color noise than the DSLR, but as dark blues and purples appear murky.
Feb 24, 2016
Aug 9, 2016
Jun 14, 2016
May 25, 2016
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Kingfisher by cjf2|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 11, K
|Bull Rider Being Launched by RBFresno|
from FX bodies and very high ISO