Nokia 808 PureView Review
10 Conclusion & Gallery
Conclusion - Pros:
- Excellent detail resolution in all modes
- Very good image quality - detailed, colorful JPEGs
- Impressive photographic feature set - controllable ISO, WB, scene modes et al
- Generally reliable AF and metering
- Automatic white balance works well in all but the trickiest of light
- PureView allows 'zoom' without penalty in image quality
- Excellent video quality (and sound)
Conclusion - Cons:
- Highlight clipping problematic in scenes with wide tonal range
- No automatic HDR/dynamic range expansion function (but bracketing is available)
- Metering can be rather wayward in bright light
- On-screen histogram only available while exposure compensation dialog is open
- Interface somewhat dense in 'creative' mode
- Obscure on-screen icons for ND filter and white balance in creative mode
- On-screen ISO indication just shows 'M' when any setting other than Auto is selected
- Non-optical 'zooming' doesn't allow control over depth of field
- No image stabilization in still capture mode
- Red-eye can be an issue in flash shots (but red-eye reduction works well)
Considering the 808 is a phone first and a camera second, it's pretty impressive. The user interface is a little fussy (I'd prefer less obscure icons for ISO and white balance on the left-hand control panel, for one thing, and a proper live histogram would be useful) but it doesn't take too long to get used to. I don't much like the Symbian 'way of doing things' but this is as much about my unfamiliarity with the soon-to-be-defunct operating system as much as it is about the weaknesses of Symbian itself.
In PureView mode, zooming in and out using vertical swipes soon becomes second nature. I'm an iPhone user normally, but zooming with the iPhone's pinch gesture has never felt natural to me (admittedly there is also a tiny zoom 'bar' on the iPhone too, but it's very fiddly). But more importantly, when you zoom in on the 808, you don't have to pay a huge penalty in image quality. Because images aren't upscaled, pixel-level image quality at the extent of the 808's 'zoom' in any given PureView mode is basically the same as it is at 38MP, which is to say that it's not bad at all.
For the majority of shooting situations, the 808's method of simulating an optical zoom works very well, allowing for a degree of flexibility over framing that is simply impossible when taking pictures with other smartphones. While you can get a degree of background blur in images from the 808, its actual (as opposed to effective) focal length of 8mm means you have to position your subject very close to the lens to see it. This isn't always possible (and with portraits, rarely flattering).
The only major issue that I have with the 808's is highlight clipping. Blown-out highlights are very obvious in scenes with a wide tonal range, and this first-generation PureView phone doesn't offer an equivalent to the 'automatic' dynamic-range expansion and HDR functions that are becoming commonplace on other smartphones and compact cameras. In virtually every other respect, the 808 gives excellent image quality considering the type of device that it is. Pixel-level detail is high at low ISO settings and acceptable even at ISO 1600 for non-critical applications. In terms of sharpness and detail, the 808 is more than a match at low ISO settings for most compact cameras (and some DSLRs).
The Final Word
There are inexpensive compact cameras that offer more photographer-friendly features than the 808, but as a cameraphone, the Nokia blows its competition out of the water, and significantly narrows the gap between dedicated cameras and portable communications devices to the point where ultimate convergence seems all but inevitable.
Nokia didn't release the 808 PureView in the hope of making much of a dent in the smartphone market - the Symbian operating system is obsolete, and Nokia's future plans are focussed on Microsoft's Windows Phone OS. If you want an 808 in the USA, you'll have to pay full price ($699) since no carrier (to date) is subsidizing the hardware through contracts on this side of the Atlantic. But while the Nokia 808 might not be an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy killer, it is a fascinating and compelling product, and one that has added a definite shine to Nokia's reputation in the tech industry, which was looking a little tarnished, to say the least.
The 808 proves that Nokia can innovate, and its PureView oversampling technology has piqued the interest of serious photographers, being one of the most important innovations - arguable the most important - in mobile photography since the smarphone era dawned five or so years ago. As such, the 808 is intriguing not just in itself, but because of what it represents.
DxOMark Image Quality Assessment
To quote the DxOMark image scientists the 808's camera
"is the best tested by our Lab so far with a Photo Mobile Score of 81." With excellent detail, low noise and pleasant color, the 808 is only really let down by poor close range and low light Autofocus. Video is great in bright light, but far less impressive in dimly lit conditions, with noise, focus and stabilization issues bringing the score down to 68. For more detailed analysis, visit www.dxomark.com.
Nokia 808 Pureview
Category: Mobile Phone
Camera and Photo Features
Ergonomics and Handling
Still Image Quality
Speed and Responsiveness
The Nokia 808 PureView is quite simply, in a class of its own when it comes to its photographic abilties. The highest-resolution capture mode (the 38MP figure that grabbed the headlines when it was released) is only part of the story. PureView oversampling means that the 808 gives truly excellent image quality in its 3, 5 and 8MP capture modes, and we love the amount of manual control over shooting parameters. The 808 is let down by less than perfect color and white balance, and occasional focus issues.
There are 35 images in our Nokia 808 samples gallery. Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter / magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review), we do so in good faith, please don't abuse it.
Unless otherwise noted images taken with no particular settings at full resolution.
Oct 25, 2013
Oct 2, 2015
Jul 30, 2012
Oct 6, 2015