Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4G review
Studio Tests - DX format
The AF-S Nikkor 50mm F1.4G struggles a little on DX at wider apertures, but improves rapidly on stopping down. It's a clear improvement over the AF-Nikkor 50mm F1.4 D at larger apertures (F1.4 - F2.8), and close in performance to the Sigma 50mm F1.4 EX DC HSM, with the Sigma holding a slight advantage at the largest apertures but the Nikon edging ahead when stopped down. As usual it benefits from the 'sweet spot' advantages of low distortion and minimal vignetting which are common to shooting full-frame lenses on DX.
Sharpness |
Sharpness wide open is nothing to write home about, but stopping down improves things dramatically. Performance is impressively consistent across the frame, with the corners only ever slightly softer than the centre. The very best results are obtained between F5.6 and F8, with exceptional sharpness right across the frame. |
Chromatic Aberration |
Lateral chromatic aberration is measurable, but unlikely to be visible in real-world shots unless you go out of your way to look for it. More problematic are the non-zero CA figures towards the centre at wide apertures, which betray blue 'color blur' as a result of color-specific spherical aberration. However this is much improved over the older 50mm F1.4D, and it essentially disappears by F2. |
Falloff |
We consider falloff to become perceptible when the corner illumination falls to more than 1 stop less than the centre. As usual for a full-frame lens used on DX, there's really nothing to worry about here; measured vignetting is one stop wide open, but disappears on stopping down to F1.8. |
Distortion |
Distortion is very low at just 0.4% barrel, which is most unlikely to have any significant impact in real-world use. |
Macro Focus
 |
50mm F1.4 primes are not intended as macro lenses, and the Nikon doesn't offer any surprises here. Maximum magnification is 0.16x, at a measured closest focus distance of 43.5cm, which gives a working distance of 33.5cm from the front of the lens to the subject.
Image quality at large apertures (not surprisingly) isn't great, but the centre sharpens up well on stopping down to F4, with the corners a stop or so behind. There's a little barrel distortion and a tiny hint of red/cyan chromatic aberration. |
Macro - 153 x 102 mm coverage
Distortion: moderate barrel
Corner softness: low
Focal length: 50mm |
Specific image quality issues
As always, our studio tests are backed up by taking hundreds of photographs with the lens across a range of subjects, and examining them in detail. This allows us to confirm our studio observations, and identify any other issues which don't show up in the tests.
Softness wide open
Shooting a fast full-frame lens wide open on a DX camera tends to be a recipe for soft images, as shown in our studio tests. Fortunately the AF-S 50mm F1.4G is a clear improvement over its predecessor in this regard, and the images below illustrate the difference between shooting the lens wide open and stopped-down close to its optimum aperture. At F1.4 fine detail is rendered quite well, but at low contrast and with some visible chromatic aberration (with a distinct red tint to the grays and blacks). Stop down to F4 and detail is rendered more crisply, with much higher contrast, and just the tiniest degree of red/cyan fringing from lateral chromatic aberration.
F1.4 |
F4 |
 |
 |
Nikon D300 |
 |
 |
100% crop, centre of frame |
 |
 |
100% crop, top left corner |
Gear in this story
Gear in this story
Highly Recommended
DPReview score:
89%
|
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2009
|
Sep 22, 2008
|
Jun 11, 2012
|
Jun 4, 2012
|
Full-frame Canon and Nikon shooters have a new 50mm F1.4 lens to consider. The Tokina 50mm F1.4 FF features an ultrasonic motor, weather-sealed design, and a focus ring that rotates the same direction as native Canon and Nikon glass.
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
Comments