Compared to Leica M9
First of all we'll look at the X1 alongside it's big brother, the M9. These two cameras are very different, of course, here we're seeing how the X1 inherits much of its looks and design from the classic rangefinder.
Compared to Sigma DP2
The most similar camera to the X1 currently available is undoubtedly the Sigma DP2. Both are unashamedly 'photographer's compacts' with the bare minimum of features, built around large sensors and high quality fixed F2.8 lenses with full manual control. You can buy a DP2, its 28mm-lensed twin the DP1, and pretty well all of their accessories (optical viewfinders, lens hoods etc) and still have change from the price of the X1.
Compared to Panasonic DMC-GF1
The other cameras the X1 will be competing with are the latest compact Micro Four Thirds designs, the Panasonic GF1 and Olympus Pen E-P1/E-P2. Here we're comparing against the GF1, which offers the more similar feature set (including a pop-up flash) - indeed given Leica's long-running cooperation with Panasonic, this is the camera many people expected to tweak and release under its own brand instead of the X1. The Pens, in contrast, have no flash but include in-body image stabilization and 'retro' styling (although a distinctly modern control layout).
Compared to Canon Powershot G11
The Canon Powershot G11 isn't a direct competitor of the X1 as such - it's a small sensor camera with a useful 28-140mm zoom range - but it's the latest in a long line that's been a perennial favorite amongst enthusiast photographers, as a capable camera which can be carried around everywhere and fits in a coat pocket. This comparison shows that, despite its much larger sensor, the X1 isn't really much different in size to Canon's top-end compact.
Key specifications compared
Here's the key specifications of the X1 compared to its immediate competitors and two popular 'enthusiast' small sensor compacts, the Canon Powershot G11 and Panasonic LX3 (also known as the Leica D-Lux 4). Once you take the lens into account, the X1 is rather lighter than the Micro Four Thirds cameras, and is slimmer and easier to slip into a pocket (even using the 'pancake' primes). It's slightly smaller and lighter than the Canon G11 too, and a hair slimmer than the DP2. In this particular field, only the LX3 is clearly more portable.
Camera | Kit price |
Lens* (35mm equiv) |
LCD | Dimensions & Weight (with lens, battery + card) |
Anti Shake |
Sensor (effective pixels) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leica X1 | $2000 | 35mm F2.8 |
2.7" 230k pixels |
124 x 60 x 50 mm, 330g 4.9 x 2.4 x 2.0 in, 10.9 oz |
Electronic | 12.2 Mp CMOS (23.6 x 15.8 mm) |
Sigma DP2 | $632 | 40mm F2.8 |
2.5" 230k pixels |
115 x 64 x 56mm, 280g 4.5 x 2.5 x 2.2 in, 9.9 oz |
None | 4.6 MP x 3 X3F (20.7 x 13.8 mm) |
Panasonic DMC-GF1 |
$899 | 40mm F1.7* |
3.0" 460k pixels |
119 x 71 x 61 mm, 448g 4.6 x 2.8 x 2.4 in, 15.8 oz |
None | 12.1 MP LiveMOS (17.3 x 13 mm) |
Olympus E-P1 | $899 | 35mm F2.8* |
3.0" 230k pixels |
121 x 70 x 58mm, 426g 4.8 x 2.8 x 2.3 in, 15.0 oz |
In-body | 12.3 MP LiveMOS (17.3 x 13 mm) |
Canon G11 | $500 | 28-140mm F2.8-4.5 |
2.8" 460k pixels |
109 x 78 x 48.3mm, 375g 4.3 x 3.1 x 1.9", 13.2 oz |
Lens | 10.0 MP CCD (7.6 x 5.7 mm) |
Panasonic DMC-LX3 |
$499 | 24-60mm F2-2.5 |
3.0" 460k pixels |
109 x 62 x 45mm, 265g 4.3 x 62 x 1.8 in, 9.3 oz |
Lens | 10.1 MP CCD (8.0 x 5.5 mm) |
* The Panasonic DMC-GF1 and Olympus E-P1 accept interchangeable lenses based on the Micro Four Thirds standard
Comments