DxOMark Mobile Report: Motorola Droid Turbo 2
The Droid Turbo 2 is Motorola's latest high-end model for US carrier Verizon. With Sony's 1/2.4-inch 21MP IMX230 sensor and an F2.0 aperture the camera specification is pretty much identical to the Moto X Style but the new model comes with a more powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 chipset, a shatter-proof display and a massive 3760 mAh battery that, according to Motorola, is good for 48 hours of battery life. At 5.4 inches the display is a touch smaller than the X Style's 5.7-inch screen but offers the same Quad-HD resolution. A microSD slot is on board for memory expansion and like other high-end Motorola devices the Droid Turbo 2 can be ordered with wooden or leather backs and is customizable via the MotoMaker website.
With a DxOMark Mobile score of 84 the Droid Turbo 2 achieves the same score as the Google Nexus 6P and places itself on the number four spot in the DxOMark smartphone rankings, only topped by the Sony Xperia Z5 , the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge and the Nexus 6P. The DxOMark team reports that the Droid images show "very good detail preservation in outdoor conditions" and "good white balance and generally pleasant colors". "Pictures are well exposed" and "noise is barely visible in outdoor conditions".
On the downside, "fine details are lost in low light conditions, ghosting and other artifacts are sometimes visible" and when shooting with flash "strong luminance shading and chroma noise is visible in the corners".
In video mode the DxO team liked the "good stabilization, fast white balance and exposure adaptation and pleasant color rendering". The team also found that "detail is well preserved". However, "in low light, strong luminance noise and chroma noise is visible, particularly in the corners, autofocus instabilities are visible and the camera has difficulties tracking objects". The DxoMark team also found that "in low light autofocus is sometimes slow to trigger after a scene change".
Color, Exposure and Contrast
The DxOMark team found that when shooting with the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 "pictures are well exposed" and show "good white balance and generally pleasant colors". On the downside, "some highlights are occasionally blown in bright outdoor scenes" and "some white balance and exposure irregularities" can be observed in low light.
Overall DxOMark awarded the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 scores of:
- 4.5 out of 5 for Exposure
- 4.6 out of 5 for White Balance accuracy
- 3.8 out of 5 for Color shading in low light*
- 4.2 out of 5 for Color shading in bright light*
- 3.0 out of 5 for Color Rendering in low light
- 4.5 out of 5 for Color Rendering in bright light
*Color Shading is the nasty habit cellphone cameras have of rendering different areas of the frame with different color shifts, resulting in pictures with, for example, pinkish centers and greenish corners.
Noise and Details
DxOMark's engineers reported that the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 images show "very good detail preservation in outdoor conditions" and that "noise is barely visible in outdoor conditions". However, "some luminance noise is visible in low light conditions".
Texture acutance is a way of measuring the ability of a camera to capture images that preserve fine details, particularly the kind of low contrast detail (such as fine foliage, hair or fur) that can be blurred away by noise reduction or obliterated by excessive sharpening.
Sharpness is an important part of the quality of an image, but while it's easy to look at an image and decide visually whether it's sharp or not, the objective measurement of sharpness is less straightforward.
An image can be defined as "sharp" if edges are sharp and if fine details are visible. In-camera processing means that it's possible to have one of these (sharp edges) but not the other (fine details). Conventional MTF measurements tell us how sharp an edge is, but have drawbacks when it comes to measuring fine detail preservation. Image processing algorithms can detect edges and enhance their sharpness, but they can also find homogeneous areas and smooth them out to reduce noise.
Texture acutance, on the other hand, can qualify sharpness in terms of preservation of fine details, without being fooled by edge enhancement algorithms.
At first sight, the images from these two cameras may appear equally sharp. A sharpness measurement on edges will indeed confirm this impression, and will even show that the second camera is sharper. But a closer examination of low contrasted textures shows that the first camera has better preservation of fine details than the second. The purpose of the texture acutance measurement is to qualify this difference.
Visual noise is a value designed to assess the noise in an image as perceived by the human visual system, depending on the viewing condition (size of image, size of screen or print, viewing distance). The measurements have no units and can be simply viewed as the weighted average of noise standard deviation for each channel in the CIE L*a*b* color space. The lower the measurement, the less noise in the image.
Noise and Detail Perceptual scoring
- Texture (bright light): 5.0 out of 5
- Texture (low light): 3.6 out of 5
- Noise (bright light): 4.3 out of 5
- Noise (low light) 3.3 out of 5
Phone cameras, like entry-level compact cameras, tend to suffer from artifacts such as sharpening halos, color fringing, vignetting (shading) and distortion, which can have an impact on the visual appeal of the end result. DxOMark engineers measure and analyze a range of artifacts. Their findings after testing the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 are shown below:
- Ghosting sometimes visible in HDR mode
- Some blue sky saturation in bright outdoor scenes
- Noticeable color fringing in high-contrast scenes
- Slight ringing
- Sharpness 4.3 out of 5
- Color fringing 3.4 out of 5
- Ringing center 7.5%
- Ringing corner 2.4%
- Max geometric distortion -0.2%
- Luminance shading 16.7%
Distortion and Chromatic Aberrations
DxOMark also tests autofocus accuracy and reliability by measuring how much the acutance - or sharpness - varies with each shot over a series of 30 exposures (defocusing then using the autofocus for each one). As with other tests these results are dependent on the viewing conditions (a little bit out of focus matters a lot less with a small web image than a full 8MP shot viewed at 100%). Using the 8MP equivalent setting, the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 performs very well at all light levels. The overall score is 93/100 in bright light and 91/100 in low light.
- Accurate and stable trigger mode in all lighting conditions
- Accurate and stable auto mode in low light conditions
- Fast autofocus in bright light conditions
- Slight irregularities in low light trigger mode
- Slight overshoot in low light preview
The Motorola Droid Turbo 2 comes with a dual-LED flash and DxOMark scored the camera 80/100 overall for its flash performance.
- Good exposure with and without additional light sources
- Good detail preservation
- Generally accurate white balance and good color rendering
- Strong chroma noise visible in the corners
- Strong luminance shading without additional light source
- Slight color shading
Overall DxOMark Mobile Score for Photo: 84 / 100
DxOMark engineers put phone cameras through a similarly grueling set of video tests, and you can read their full findings on the DxOMark website here. Overall, DxOMark found the Motorola Droid Turbo 2's video footage to be well stabilized, with good good detail and colors. White balance and exposure adapt quickly to changing scenes but the AF shows some instabilities and noise becomes visible in low light.
- Detail is well preserved
- Good stabilization
- Fast white balance and exposure adaptation
- Pleasant color rendering
- In low light, strong luminance noise and chroma noise is visible, particularly in the corners
- Autofocus instabilities, difficulties when tracking objects
- In low light, the autofocus is sometimes slow to trigger after a scene change
Overall DxOMark Mobile Score for Video: 84 / 100
DXOMark Image Quality Assessment
With a DxOMark Mobile score of 84 the Motorola Droid Turbo 2 achieves the forth highest score in the DxOMark smartphone rankings, being beaten only by the Sony Xperia Z5, Samsung Galaxy S6 and google Nexus 6P.
The DxOMark team liked the Droid's good exposure and pleasant color. In bright light they measured low noise levels and very good image detail. However, they also noted a loss of detail in low light conditions and chroma noise when shooting with flash. The latter is also noticeable in low light video but general video quality is good, with very efficient digital image stabilization. For a more detailed analysis, visit www.dxomark.com.
Jun 2, 2016
Oct 27, 2015
Oct 27, 2015
Apr 23, 2017
|LIKE A FLAG by DIM POL|
from Your City - Metal
|Clash by AnaxImperator|
|Mobius Arch by evanrassbcglobalnet|
from Light - Dark
|Road to the Galaxy by man4mopar|
from My Best Photo of the Week