Canon EOS 30D Review
Our new Dynamic Range measurement system involves shooting a calibrated Stouffer Step Wedge (13 stops total range) which is backlit using a daylight balanced lamp (98 CRI). A single shot of this produces a gray scale wedge from (the cameras) black to clipped white (example below). Each step of the scale is equivalent to 1/3 EV (a third of a stop), we select one step as 'middle gray' and measure outwards to define the dynamic range. Hence there are 'two sides' to our results, the amount of shadow range (below middle gray) and the amount of highlight range (above middle gray).
To most people highlight range is the first thing they think about when talking about dynamic range, that is the amount of highlight detail the camera can capture before it clips to white. Shadow range is more complicated, in our test we stop measuring values below middle gray as soon as the luminance value drops below our defined 'black point' (about 2% luminance) or the signal-to-noise ratio drops below a predefined value (where shadow detail would be swamped by noise), whichever comes first.
ISO Sensitivity and Dynamic Range
The EOS 30D delivers a pretty consistent 8.4 EV of dynamic range between ISO 100 and 400, this drops slightly at ISO 800 and 1600. The reason for this drop is we are calling the 'shadow range' earlier because the signal-to-noise ratio of the particular patch is below our predefined value. Overall an impressive performance which is slightly higher than the competition up to ISO 400 and noticeably better at ISO 800 and 1600.
|Sensitivity||Shadow range||Highlight range||Usable range|
|ISO 100||-5.1 EV||3.3 EV||8.4 EV|
|ISO 200||-5.1 EV||3.3 EV||8.4 EV|
|ISO 400||-5.1 EV||3.3 EV||8.4 EV|
|ISO 800||-4.9 EV||3.3 EV||8.2 EV|
|ISO 1600||-4.7 EV||3.3 EV||8.0 EV|
|ISO 3200 (H)||-4.0 EV||3.3 EV||7.3 EV|
Obviously an ISO 1600 image would contain areas of shadow with a level below our 'shadow range' point however it would difficult to make out any detail because of noise, this can be seen more clearly in the 100% wedge crops below. Step 31 represents -4.3 EV on our graph above, each step represents +/- 0.3 EV. As you can see on the ISO 1600 crop it's difficult to make out the difference between the steps below step 32, the amount of noise now overtakes any useful 'signal'. (Note that the crops below have had their brightness boosted to make it easier to see the patches, for unmodified crops click on these links: ISO 100 crop, ISO 1600 crop).
|ISO 100 (image brightness boosted)|
|ISO 1600 (image brightness boosted)|
Dynamic Range compared
An interesting difference between the EOS 30D and EOS 5D was that the 5D managed to deliver slightly more 'highlight range' but we called the 'shadow range' earlier than the EOS 30D (on luminance value). The overall performance between these three cameras is virtually identical (apart from the shape of the curve), it would be difficult to make out 0.2 EV's difference.
|Camera (ISO 100)||
|Canon EOS 30D||-5.1 EV||3.3 EV||8.4 EV|
|Canon EOS 5D||-4.7 EV||3.5 EV||8.2 EV|
|Nikon D200||-5.0 EV||3.2 EV||8.2 EV|
The wedges below are created by our measurement system from the values read from the step wedge, the red lines indicate approximate shadow and highlight range to the nearest third of a stop (the exact range is calculated to sub-stop fractions and using calibration data).
Next we will test the additional headroom available in RAW files. Experience has told us that there is typically around 1 EV (one stop) of extra information available at the highlight end in RAW files and that a negative digital exposure compensation when converting such files can recover detail lost to over-exposure. As with previous reviews we settled on Adobe Camera RAW for conversion to retrieve the maximum dynamic range from our test shots.
As you can see from the graph and wedges below Adobe Camera RAW in default mode actually returns a little less dynamic range, a combination of a more contrasty tone curve and more noise in shadow areas means it is cut-off by our 'lowest acceptable SNR'. The best we could achieve (with some pretty extreme ACR settings) was just over 10 stops total dynamic range, and more importantly about a stop more highlight range (although with no guarantee of color accuracy).
- ACR Default: Exp. 0.0 EV, Shadows 5, Bright. 50, Contrast 25, Curve Medium (Default)
- ACR Best: Exp. -1.3 EV, Shadows 0, Bright. 70, Contrast -50, Curve Linear
One thing to bear in mind is that although ACR was able to retrieve the 'luminance' (brightness) of wedge steps which were previously clipped there's no guarantee of color accuracy as individual channels may clip before others. (Note that the wedge below labeled as 'ISO 100' is of course a JPEG straight from the camera).
|Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.4MP DSLR Camera with 24-70mm IS USM Lens Memory & Flash Kit||$4399.00|
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Kingfisher by cjf2|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 11, K
|Bull Rider Being Launched by RBFresno|
from FX bodies and very high ISO