Canon EOS 6D In-Depth Review
Resolution Chart Comparison (JPEG and Raw)
Images on this page are of our standard resolution chart which provides for measurement of resolution up to 4000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height). A value of 20 equates to 2000 lines per picture height. For each camera we use the relevant prime lens (the same one we use for all the other tests in a particular review). The chart is shot at a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected. Studio light, cameras set to aperture priority (optimum aperture selected), image parameters default. Exposure compensation set to deliver approximately 80% luminance in the white areas.
What we want to show here is how well the camera is able to resolve the detail in our standard test chart compared to the theoretical maximum resolution of the sensor, which for the charts we shoot is easy to work out - it's simply the number of vertical pixels (the chart shows the number of single lines per picture height, the theoretical limit is 1 line per pixel). Beyond this limit (which when talking about line pairs is usually referred to as the Nyquist frequency) the sensor cannot faithfully record image detail and aliasing occurs.
This limit is rarely attained, because the majority of sensors are fitted with anti-aliasing filters. Anti-aliasing filters are designed to reduce unpleasant moiré effects, but in doing so, they also reduce resolution (the relative strength and quality of these filters varies from camera to camera). In theory though, a sensor without an AA filter, when coupled with a 'perfect' lens, will deliver resolution equal to its Nyquist limit. Therefore, even though it may be effectively unattainable with normal equipment in normal shooting situations, an understanding of a sensor's theoretical limit provides a useful benchmark for best possible performance. Nyquist is indicated in these crops with a red line.
On this page we're looking at both JPEG and Raw resolution. For a (more) level playing field we convert the latter using Adobe Camera Raw. Because Adobe Camera Raw applies different levels of sharpening to different cameras (this confirmed) we use the following workflow for these conversions:
- Load Raw file into Adobe Camera Raw (Auto mode disabled)
- Set Sharpness to 0 (all other settings default)
- Open file to Photoshop
- Apply a Unsharp mask tuned to the camera, here 180%, Radius 0.4, Threshold 0
- Make 100% crops and save the original file at JPEG quality 11 for download
|JPEG (5472 x 3648) 4.5MB||JPEG (5472 x 3648) 5.4MB|
The resolution chart shows off just how ineffective the JPEG engine is at rendering fine detail. The 6D comfortably renders detail up to around 2600 lph (which is what you'd expect), but the JPEG gives up very soon after this point, whereas Raw processing and fine-radius sharpening allows you to realize convincing detail beyond 2800 lph Moiré and false color creep in beyond this point, but this is necessary to reach the 2800+ lph that the Nikon D600's 24MP sensor can produce.
|Canon EOS 6D Black SLR Digital Camera Body Only||$1499.00|
|Canon EOS 6D CMOS Digital SLR Camera, Batteries, and Cards Bundle||$1499.00|
|Canon EOS 6D CMOS Digital SLR Camera, Lenses, and Cards Bundle||$1824.00|
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Too Sloooow by citori525|
from Fast and Slow
|Kranhaus by taugenichts|
from Your City - New Buildings
|Red-tailed Hawk by bryand7k|
from My Best Photo of the Week
|Oxbow Bend, Teton NP by stickpointed|