Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Announced Feb 6, 2014 •
Lens | Canon EF-S, Nikon F (DX), Sony/Minolta Alpha | B016
princewolf
 

I was seduced by the idea that such a wide range zoom could produce decent images.  However, I was badly disappointed.  Forget using this lens at the long end, the softness and color fringing are severe.  It can produce some nice images at the wide end.  But this is not at all the reason why I bought this lens.  I bought it for the range, and trust me you will find yourself using it at that max telephoto FL, and the images will look fine on the LCD, but when you upload them to the computer ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
AdSR
 

From architecture to portraits, from landscapes to closeups — this lens does a lot of different things rather well. Of course, the extremely wide range of focal lengths comes at a price. Optical distortions are pronounced, especially in the middle of the range, but they can be corrected in post-processing. Just remember to frame with a margin when taking pictures. On modern 18-24 MP sensors sharpness is acceptable when the aperture is stopped down about one stop, which would be f/5.6 to f/9 ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

After about 3500 frames with this combination, time to review it. I'm focusing on the lens, but in one regard the body combination may be relevant. I purchased this lens a few months ago to replace my Canon EF 18-135 (non-USM/STM) and EF 70-300 IS lenses. My purpose in purchasing this lens was to replace those two lenses for travel and other purposes where convenience and light weight is more important than large aperture and absolute top image quality. The fact that it adds 2mm on the short ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

I'm very interest with this new lens from Tamron, actually... this is the first time I used Tamron Lens.. After several test photo... there is something that I'm not satisfied when I used both Canon 80D with Tamron 16-300mmm. Sometime I get the right focus and clear, but sometime I lost the focus when I take close up photo..., for landscape photo nothing problems.. but more for close up photo, also moving subject ..., taking a close up photo in a room with the bright light (day time) need ISO ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

I received this lens on a deal which made it 350 dollar for rebate. I was looking for something that I can take travelling, with good range, taking decent quality images. I have tried the lens on a canon 70D. Pluses. 1. obvious range 2. Good performance through out range stopped down, on the wide end, it is good at 5.6 and very good at f8. on the tele end, its decent even wide open 3. Good VC for stills and videos. 4. Ok Bokeh at 300mm. Minuses. Slow focusing. specially strugles on the longer ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

I bought this on a whim for a 5-day hike in the Grand Canyon 3 weeks ago. It saved me about 2 pounds carry-weight and changing lenses in the desert dust. It also brought back images of California Condors and distant crags I could never have reached with my normal travel lens (EFs 15-85). I took dozens of stitched panos and shot some great 1080p footage of boats shooting Granite Rapids. Macro was an unexpected bonus. And it did all this with far better image quality than I dared hope for. I ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

I bought this lens to upgrade from a venerable Nikkor 18-200 F/3.5-5.6G ED VR II. I kept waiting for test results and samples to appear but finally decided to just take the plunge based on published specs alone. After two days of test shooting and use (including reference shots of macro-algae specimens for my coastal scientist wife) I can say this is a very good and versatile lens with definite limitations. The accompanying sample photos were taken with a Nikon D7100 and are presented with ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
surgrn
 

I just bought this lens about a week ago. It is a bit heavy at first but it quickly becomes part of the camera. I am using this lens on my Nikon D-7000. I shot about 100 pix using different setting and I really like how this lens performs. Wide angle to telephoto, the lens doesn't miss a beat. It quickly adapts to my shooting style, everything from scenery and landscapes to my two Golden Retrievers playing in my yard. I can't wait to take it to the Grand Canyon next month, as we are taking a ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review
Canon shooter1958
 

I have to admit that I was a bit sceptical about the IQ from a lens with such a huge F/L. Something just had to give! I was pleasantly surprised when I got some really outstanding images from it and that's coming from someone who is really fussy about IQ and used to Canon L series lenses. It's now permanently attached to my 70D and although not a wedding lens, I do intend to use it for candid shots at my next wedding shoot, especially outdoors, a massive 25-480mm F/L range with very little ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review

I've been shooting with the Tamron 16-300 for almost 10 months now. This lens has received its share of appreciation for its versatility but occasional criticism, especially from a few here who repeatedly maligned the lens for its problems (without actually posting a single image in most cases) in what almost seemed like a negative-campaign. My experience has been that it is a really nice lens to carry with you. I've taken it on travel, walking/hiking and for general use. The combination of ...

View review in forums Leave a comment on this review