Sigma 1.4x EX DG Tele Converter Q&As
Announced Oct 5, 2005 •
Teleconverter | Canon EF, Nikon F (FX), Pentax KAF, Sigma SA Bayonet, Sony/Minolta Alpha
Ask a question in forums about the Sigma 1.4x EX DG Tele Converter.
Ask a new question
Hi, I just started with Wildlife Photography. I use the Canon R7 with the Sigma 150-600c (Yes I know the Pusling Issue) For the following images I also used a 1.4x converter so I were shooting at 1300mm Following Images were shot in med cloudy whether. I dont think those Images are perfectly sharp, or is this normal? The pusling shouldn´t be an issue with my settings and because the subject is not very close. Thanks for your replies Greetings Niklas 1/1000s | ISO 500 | f6.3 | 960mm 1/1000s |...
I've heard that the 500mm f/4 doesn't seem to share the AF pulsing issues that the 150-600mm has on R cameras. It seems to be a great option for me but I really want to know how well the AF performs on the R5 when you add in a 1.4x TC. Also, should I go for the Sigma TC or the Canon EF 1.4x III? If anyone has any experience with this please let me know. Any help is greatly appreciated.
By: Buteobuteo4 (Jun 20, 2022)
Posted to: Nikon DX SLR (D40-D90, D3000-D7500) Talk
Hi, before I bought the tc sigma 1.4x ex dg for this camera, I tested kenko 1.4x dgc and kenko 1.5x mc dg, only kenko 1.5x worked with my camera, but without autofocus. Nextly I bought this sigma 1.4x and at now I don't have autofocus, but but it displays all parameters. Of course, Nikon with only the Sigma 100-300 dg apo hsm have very fast AF. What could be the problem? Greetings
I've attempted multiple times to capture the full or near-full moon using the following gear: Tripod Canon EOS R5 Canon RF-EF adapter Sigma 1.4x TC Sigma Contemporary 150-600mm f/5.0-6.3 DG OS HSM lens Also note: I was in manual focus on the moon, which seemed to focus just fine in the moment I had lens OS (Optical Stability) off, but still had the camera's IBIS system on I was shooting in RAW mode I was at the max zoom of the lens, which realistically means I had a focal length of 840mm I...
By: PLUEM (Jul 29, 2021)
Posted to: Third Party Lens Talk
Hi My English is not very good, I hope you can understand. I use 5D Mark iv with canon 70-200 f2.8 is iii usm to photograph birds I found that 200 mm Not enough for shooting birds at all So I think I need to get a super telephoto lens for bird photography, but I had a hard time deciding with these two lens. I'm thinking of buying a [Sigma 120-300 F2.8 Sports + Sigma Tc-2001 2x] to get a 600mm But the [Sigma 500mm f4 sport] is another interesting option Sigma seems to be my only option....
Hello, Currently (Oct. 2020), Sony is the only one providing lenses compatible with x1.4 and x2.0 teleconverters for Sony E mount. Do you believe that Sigma will create the 70-200 2.8 for Sony FE that will be compatible with Sony's or Sigma teleconverters? or rephrasing the question: Is there any reason / limitation that Tamron and Sigma has NOT introduced teleconverters for tele-photo lenses? ( e.g. Sigma 100-400 DN, Tamron 70-180 2.8 ) The context of my question is that I'm struggling with...
By: caplanner (May 27, 2019)
Posted to: Sony Alpha Full Frame E-mount Talk
I've searched high and low without results for any information on the performance of the Sigma 100-400mm on the A9 AFTER the firmware updates (5.00 and 5.01). I see results from 2018 and see a great deal of results from 2018 for the A7RIII, which I also have but would use this lens with the A9. I'll start by saying I've only purchased native Sony lenses in the past because I didn't want to deal with the issues, albeit minor issues to some given the price difference between the Sigma and...
|Spotted Owlet by lsdhillon
|Man on Bench by number_5
from A Simple Subject
|Photo_4621 by Zilvinas K
from Camera Gear - macro only, no close-up
|Sunset off Key West by Richard Carande
from My Best Non-bird Photo of the Fortnight 18
Most popular cameras