Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF Q&As

Wideangle zoom lens | Nikon F (FX) | 1960
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF Ask a question in forums about the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF.
Ask a new question
8
Questions
asked
0
Questions
answered
Filter questions by
2
replies
Hello, i own a D600 my current lens lineup is 50mm f1.8d and 80200mm f2.8d. im looking for a good uwa ill be using it for events eg. documenting..debuts and etc...which one do you suggest i buy ? Thanks!
67
replies
Hi all, I had been using a 17-35 f/2.8 af-s that had developed a squeak over the years and then would stop auto-focusing intermittently till it eventually jammed completely. Coming from a non-Nikon repair center part of the world, I once tried getting an estimate and repair evaluation at Nikon Thailand but was told that I was to wait for 2 weeks and because I was there on business for a few days couldn't leave it there. (a shutter replacement on a D600 took almost 3 months by Nikon...
By: benmurrey (Jan 25, 2018)
16
replies
I have a decision to make and I'm having trouble getting good advice. I bought a brand new AF-S NIKKOR18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G ED lens a few months ago ($750 new) but was just given a damaged AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED for free ($2,000 new). In perfect condition, obviously the second is the better lens, and since they two lenses serve basically the same function for me, I'm trying to decide which to keep and which to sell. The 17-35mm lens was given to me used. It's about 8 years old and...
34
replies
I am in a predicament regarding my next purchase. I really want to take the step to FX (I shoot Nikon). However, I only just recently (last summer) bought a d7100. If I were to buy an FX body, I would feel as though I was spending too much on bodies and not glass. I am in dire need of a proper wide angle, as I use a 35mm f/2 and a 80-200 f/2.8 on my DX body. When I shoot, it feels very cramped with the 35mm because of the cropped sensor. Should I invest in wide angle glass that would would be...
0
replies
Hi, I've spent the last few days reading endless reviews and am seeking some guidance. I currently have a Nikon D5100, Sigma 10-20, Nikon 18-105, Nikon 50 f/1.8, Nikon 70-300. Lee 100mm system. Manfrotto 190CXPro3. I'm a constantly learning enthusiast into Landscape & family & club competitions. Considering selling the 10-20 to fund a Tokina 11-20 f/2.8 (I love UWA and would like to dabble with some occasional astrophotography). & upgrade to the D7200 with perhaps a Sigma/Tamron 17-50 f2.8 or...
26
replies
Always been a fan of primes, had a 10-24mm on DX but saw 20mm release and instantly bought when received my first FX body D750. Current set up 20mm 1.8G + 50mm 1.4G + 85mm 1.8G Preferred set up 20mm 1.8G + 35mm 1.8G + 85mm 1.8G (sell the 50mm 1.4G, cash value more important, buy 1.8G in future) Contemplating 16-35mm 4G ED VR + 85mm 1.8G 17-35mm 2.8D IF-ED + 85mm 1.8G (sell 20mm and 50mm 1.4G, buy 50mm 1.8G in future) What are peoples general thoughts / experiences with the lenses? I want a...
4
replies
I have a Nikon D4, and a Nikon 70-200 f/2.8  and Nikon 50 f/1.4G I am looking for a lens, that i can use for everyday shooting, as well as landscape. I'm considering the following Nikon lenses: 16-35  f/4G ED VR 17-35 f/2.8D 24-70 f/2.8G My budget only allows for a single purchase.   Any advice would be much appreciated. GD
8
replies
I was in the middle of this debate about 3 months ago, and thought I made my decision to get the 16-35mm. I was looking at tutorials for timelapse, and going over the information I had set aside for astrophotography and realized that anything above about 2.8 is not preferred for astrophotography like pictures of the Milky Way or star trails. I'm just really not sure at this point. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I do not have enough money for 2 new lenses, as I just bought a brand...
Filter questions by