Reading mode: Light Dark
Login | Register
NewsReviewsArticlesBuying GuideSample ImagesVideosCamerasLensesPhonesPrintersForumsGalleriesChallenges
CamerasAll Cameras

HP Photosmart C200

Announced Oct 3, 1999 •
1 megapixels | 1.8″ screen | 35 mm
Add this product to your shortlist for comparison
User reviews
 
(43)
See all user reviews
Write your user review
Questions & Answers
0 questions asked
Ask a new question
Gear list
2 0 2
I own it I want it I had it
Product description
Announced Oct 3, 1999
Discuss in the Samsung Talk forum
Product timeline
Not much news.. additions to database
Oct 3, 1999
Quick specs
Body type Compact
Max resolution 1152 x 872
Effective pixels 1 megapixels
Sensor type CCD
ISO 100
Focal length (equiv.) 35 mm
Max aperture F2.8–5.6
Screen size 1.8″
Max shutter speed 1/500 sec
Storage types Compact Flash
Weight (inc. batteries) 300 g (0.66 lb / 10.58 oz)
Dimensions 126 x 80 x 48 mm (4.96 x 3.15 x 1.89″)

See full specifications

HP Photosmart C200
3 customer reviews
Oops. We couldn't find the price for this product. Click here to search for this product on Amazon.
Shop now
@dpreview
Latest reviews
See all reviews »
Finished challenges
Bald Eagleheron and fishCows Cowering Under Rare California Super Cell
Bald Eagle by anisah
from Features - lips/mouth		heron and fish by APenza
from A Big Year - birds		Cows Cowering Under Rare California Super Cell by RBFresno
from -The Old Cows-
Discover more challenges »
Most popular cameras
Canon EOS Rebel SL2 (EOS 200D / Kiss X9)6.5%Nikon D8502.0%Fujifilm X-E31.4%Fujifilm X-T21.3%Nikon D7501.3%Canon EOS 6D Mark II1.3%Sony Alpha a91.2%Olympus OM-D E-M10 III1.1%Sony Alpha a63001.1%Fujifilm X-T201.1%
Other popular cameras »
Save on Amazon
Features
Getting StartedBeginner's GuidesGetting StartedLatest Camera ReviewsIn-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsFeature Articles and VideosBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and VideosField Test Videosreal world performanceField Test VideosSample Galleriessee how we seeSample GalleriesFujifilm X100FIn-depth ReviewFujifilm X100FHits and Misses from CP+ 2017Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017Classic Cameras from Days PastThrowback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days PastShedding some light on the sources of noiseWhat's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noiseWhat is equivalence?2468FeatureWhat is equivalence?
Top threads
77I do not see the difference in prints between the 800 and 850
72*** This Week Through Your M4/3 2017.09.23 ***
57I Don't Recall As Much D810 Negativity vs So Much D850 Negativity
55Lack of (major) new model stress?
45Nikon D850 AF compared to the Nikon D5
4435mm for travel? Not wide enough, not close enough and soft at close focus etc. ?? Or not!
395DIV to A9 initial observations
38How many batteries (and chargers?) do you bring? (EM-1 mk I)
37Should we have more accessories?
34When it comes to cameras/lenses, lighter, not smaller, is better.
333 quick notes on using D850 Focus Shifting
32Is Canon Dying
32Advice on inexpensive M43rds start.
32♣ ♣ Bootstrap's Sunday 'Scapes ♣ ♣ 24 September 2017
31# 0 # 0 # "YES, but is it ART?" A continuing thread. 9/23-9/29 # 0 # 0 #
26Why no Lower ISO?
26Discussion: What is your next lens? :)
26Does Your Gear Make You Good?
25have i smoothened the skin and removed the marks in the subject properly ?
24Olympus E-M5: weathersealing affected by lost hot shoe cover?
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2017 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.