Fujifilm FinePix X100
Announced Sep 19, 2010 •
12 megapixels | 2.8″ screen | 35 mm
Ask a question in forums about the Fujifilm FinePix X100.
Ask a new question
Hi everyone , I am looking for anyone who has purchased the Meikon Underwater Housing for the Fujifilm X100S and using it with the X100. I hae contacted Meikon and they say that probably it will not work as the buttons in the back are not the same. However I look at this pic and I see they are identical : http://www.chasejarvis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/xcams-620x273.jpg I can see in other reviews that the casing for X100 is 1mm shorter than the X100s so I dont know if this will affect...
I thought of getting the new 23mm f2 and for a listed price for $449 I can buy a 2nd hand X100 in good condition for the same price. I am wondering whether it would be a better option getting a 2nd body instead of getting a new 23mm f2.0. The pros of getting a 2nd hand X100 are: . a compact 2nd body . lens is properly aligned to the body . can complement another X body with detachable lens e.g. Xpro1/2 . no need to change lens because you have 2nd body The cons I can see now: . X100 has slow...
I'm debating whether to get the Fuji X70 or the Ricoh GR II. Really like the X100 style controls on the X70, but have also been a longstanding fan of Ricoh back through 35mm film days.Real world, low light performance for shooting indoors unobtrusively without flash could be the tie breaker -- any opinions on which would be best?Also curious as to whether any X70 folks are experiencing the "turn camera off..." warning -- saw one (just one) review on Amazon indicating that error?
By: bs1946 (1 month ago)
A little background about my question: Several times over the past few years, I have tried using two different camera systems at the same time. After a while I would get annoyed at using two different systems; especially when traveling. You are dealing with two sets of batteries and chargers, maybe two sets of cables, two different menu systems, and in most cases, two different sets of lenses. For a while, I had an X100T with both conversion lenses to use along with my X-E2 kit...
By: El Chubasco (2 months ago)
I converted to to Fuji after buying a X100. The hybrid VF felt like the best thing I have ever worked with. I got a X-Pro-1 and waited for the X-Pro2, which now I own. Lately, there have been several comments in this website stating that the X-Pros cameras are to be used with primes while the X-Ts are better with zooms. I have been using the 18-55mm with no issues mounted in my cameras, even using the OVF the camera performs very well. I have also used the 55-200mm with no issues...
By: Mr Bolton (2 months ago)
I recently acquired a very lightly used Fuji X-E1. My trusty old X100 did a fine job of being the gateway drug into the Fuji X system :-) The first lens I bought for it was the 35mm F2 WR prime, then the 18-55 f2.8-4 kit lens. Both from Glazer's in Seattle; the 35mm brand new, the 18-55 used but I don't think it was used a lot. Anyway, I quickly noticed that the AF acquisition speed on the 35mm f2 lens is slow-like, really slow and like almost unusable in low light situations that would...
By: Rudi (2 months ago)
After a long time I took out my X100 again and played around with it.As I developed the RAW files I stumbled about some kind of curiosity: Sensor size is : 23,6mm x 15,8mm Crop factor :horizontal 36mm / 23,6mm = factor 1,525423728813559vertical 24mm / 15,8mm = factor 1,518987341772152 So the crop factor should be ~1,52 Fujifilm say lens FL (equivalent to 35mm) = 23mm So the real lens FL must be: 23mm / 1,52 = 15,1mm EXIF data give a FL = 19mm so equivalent FL should be 19mm x 1,52 = 28,88mm...
By: Mebius (2 months ago)
Posted to: Beginners Questions
Dear fellow photographers, I have a question about the TCL x100 Fuji Tele Conversion lens 33mm. I have been using this fine lens and recently noticed that the file output is significant less then using the fixed lens: 33mm: 4649 x 3099 px instead of the fixed lens: 4896 x 3264 px. Are there other users in this forum who can confirm this? I tried to find info at Fuji but was not successfull.Thanks, Mebius
Have your say
What's been the most exciting announcement of Photokina?
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
Total voters: 5,343
Most popular cameras
In-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and VideosPIX VideosTalks, demos and panels711The Canon that canCanon EOS 80D Review372Touchscreen street shooterFujifilm X70 Review2164Upwardly mobileSony a6300 Review339Power ZoomPanasonic Lumix ZS100/TZ100 Review2501Retro through-and-throughFujifilm X-Pro2 Review333Can we get much wider?Canon EF 11-24mm F4 L USM galleryWhat's that Sound?Shedding some light on the sources of noise177Bag ReviewPeak Design Everyday Messenger1525A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601)Two in oneLG G5 camera review2228FeatureWhat is equivalence?541ArticlePanasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review177Super Zoom? Tamron 150-600mm F5-6.3 Field Test1621OpinionThe myth of the upgrade path401Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X ReviewField Test VideoNikon D7200208Long and short of itTamron 16-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro review