Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x
Announced May 14, 2013 •
Telephoto zoom lens | Canon EF | 5176B002
Ask a question in forums about the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x.
Ask a new question
By: RE Alpha (6 months ago)
Posted to: Sony Alpha Full Frame E-mount Talk
By: Pones (9 months ago)
Hi Guys I recently purchased a 200-400 2nd hand and was toying with the idea of getting a 7D mark ii as a trial to see if I achieved better results with crop camera and no extender as opposed to full frame 1Dx with extender. Also extra reach of 1.6 would be handy. 560mm FOV. v 640mm FOV. I would struggled on low light days I am sure with regard to noise. Shooting AFL Football mainly. the 7Dii looks so bad...
One gives compositional benefits, other gives more light and superb sharpness. Deciding which one, is a tough question. Can someone please suggest ? Usage is mostly mammals, early and late evening and in very dusty conditions. Does the 200-400 zoom sucks dust? How is the in built teleconverter, useful ? Not sure if I want to use the in built one and make it a slow F5.6. Thanks. --Tiger Photography
By: mermaidkiller (Aug 16, 2015)
Using an extender (tele converter) has the advantage that the absolute aperture (in mm, not as f/ number) remains the same with the same lens which allows a relative bright f/nubmer without T/C and yet acceptable with T/C. E.g the bright 200mm f/2.8L with T/C results in a yet acceptable 400 f/5.6. A zoom alternative (100-400 f/4.5-5.6L) results in a dim f/5 at 200mm. Why not make a 200-400 f/2.8-f/5.6 which replaces a T/C and a prime lens ? There is a 200-400 lens f/4L, but that is not a...
Most popular cameras
Beginner's GuidesGetting StartedIn-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videossee how we seeSample GalleriesChoose the best camera for you2017 Product Roundupsreal world performanceField Test VideosThrowback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days PastWhat's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise