Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
Announced Feb 22, 2007 •
Wideangle zoom lens | Canon EF | 1910B002
Ask a question in forums about the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM.
Ask a new question
Everything I've read so far says that the 4L is sharper - both at bigger apertures and in the corners. 1. Which one is sharper at f 8,11,16? 2. Excuse the amateur question, but what reasons could possibly make me want the 2.8L II over the 4L? My primary intention here is landscapes. Astro isn't of any concern. Thank you.
By: Sebastian Tombs (1 month ago)
Dear all, I got back into photography after a ten-year hiatus and I am rebuilding my kit. I bought a Canon 5D Mark III and the lens I have dreamed of owning since at least 2001, the 16-35/2.8 USM. My interest lies in doing journalistic work and I love the aesthetics of close-quarters photography, which I came to appreciate first with the work of the founders of VII agency. On the list for the future is the 70-200/2.8 IS USM as a must-have lens for reportage. My dilemma lies in what to get as...
Hello guys , i will be shooting a wedding this month with my friend. I will shooting the tradition part and the stage photos while he will be clicking candid shots. I will be using a 5D Mk iii. I don't understand which lens should i use which will cover both my needs of group photos and nice depth to traditional photos. I'm thinking between canon 24-70 f2.8 and canon 16-35 f2.8. you suggestions and comments on what will be the right choice for me and yes even some other lens will do. Thank you
Hello everyone. Apologies for what is probably a dumb and over asked question..... I'm wanting to get a good quality wide angle. I currently use a 6D but will be upgrading soon to either a 5DSR or possibly a 5D mk IV (whenever it is eventually released etc...) I mistakenly bought a Sigma 12-24 mk ii a month or so ago (I say mistakenly, because I bought it online from Amazon when a little merry after a few glasses of wine). This Sigma, is both too wide for my liking and doesn't produce good...
Hello All, I am currently looking to upgrade my lens Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM to either: - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM - Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM - Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Will be using this lens for Landscape and Night Photography, well basically anytime I go out of town, I shall carry this lens. Currently I try to learn more into Night Photography. I did try those three lenses and must say, am getting really confused as am happy with all the results. Therefore I would...
Hi everyone - just wanted to let you know (after the fantastic advice from this forum) that I ended up getting the 5d3 + 24-70mm f/2.8 II USM IS + 70-300mm f/4 - 5.6L IS USM + 16-35mm f2.8 Mark II USM and have travelled extensively with the 1st 2 lenses and handled it fine ! I love the sharpness of the 24-70mm and the 70-300mm has been on my camera ALOT ! Even tho the reach for Africa may have been lacking - but thats OK as I knew that would be the case ! In found in Africa I was taking so...
By: Yousef Abuaisheh (Jan 28, 2015)
Posted to: Canon EOS-1D / 5D / 6D Talk
implanning to buy a tripod for my photography...and too do a bit of videos on occasions........i hav spotted to tripods one with with a ball head and the other with both a ball and pan head...thy are dolica and ravelli respectively.....im quiet bit confused to go with ravelli as im not aware of tat brand before.......but dolica i hav seen their camera bags which are really awesome......... My question is tat whether can i go with tat Ravelli tripod of 65" or shal but another tripod some some...
By: MrSadOnion (Dec 27, 2014)
Posted to: Open Talk
Right now I have a 60D with a 28-135 kit lens and a nifty fifty that I've been using for a little bit more than a year now. It's clear to me that you should invest in lenses before you worry about the camera body, but if I can get both an L lens and a 5D, is it worth the investment to switch from the 60D that I have? I am talking purely image quality, as I am fully willing to carry around a heavier camera with me wherever I go. I feel that if I just got the 24-70 f/2.8 II, that I wouldn't be...
|IMG_8168ABCD by citori525|
|McKinley meadow by TimR32225|
from Natural meadows
|_DSC2146 by jerste|
from Helios-44 II
|Leopoldsteinersee by RaCor|
from Landscape - Colour #3
Most popular cameras
In-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and VideosPIX VideosTalks, demos and panels706The Canon that canCanon EOS 80D Review370Touchscreen street shooterFujifilm X70 Review2151Upwardly mobileSony a6300 Review329Power ZoomPanasonic Lumix ZS100/TZ100 Review2487Retro through-and-throughFujifilm X-Pro2 Review423Real-world testThe Sony a6000 goes surfing1139In-depth ReviewLeica Q198Beyond the table top5 mini tripods reviewedReady, SteadySony Alpha 7 II ReviewTwice as Nice?Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review102VideoTamron SP 15-30mm F2.8 Field Test43ArticleTo St. Helens and Back: Olympus TG-Tracker Shooting Experience40Readers' ShowcaseNicolas Alexander Otto1607OpinionThe myth of the upgrade path539ArticlePanasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review400Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X ReviewTwo in oneLG G5 camera review