Photographer Benjamin Von Wong has released photos and a video from his new Shark Shepherd photo shoot, which features a model in a white dress in the sea as sharks swim nearby. The shoot took place in Fiji and aims to expose a less-often seen side of sharks as peaceful creatures. 'I wanted to create a series of images that would help break those stereotypes and show that it is possible for us to co-exist together in perfect harmony,' said Von Wong in a post on his blog.
In his PIX 2015 talk, Benjamin Von Wong discusses his journey from taking what he describes as 'ordinary' photos to creating 'extraordinary' imagery. Throughout his career, he's made a name for his surreal images that blend practical elements, fantastic locations and post-processing. For Shark Shepherd, nothing has been added in post-processing – the photo shoot features model Amber Bourke, a champion free diver, with assistance provided by divers Steve Hathaway and Kris McBride. According to Von Wong, the shoot took place over three days with more than six hours of waiting for curious white tipped reef sharks to swim up close. The sharks were described as being like 'squirrels at a park,' getting close out of curiosity but darting away quickly when someone moved.
Take a look at a behind-the-scenes video below. You can also sign an online petition to help preserve shark populations.
I've been doing a lot of underwater modeling photography with great success, and it was Von Wong that inspired me years ago to give it a try after ages of photographing sharks, whales, etc... I just wished I did it earlier. :)
He's an amazing photographer and I'm in awe as to how easy he makes it look... which it is not.
Beautiful work. But are the sharks shepherds or wolves? I don't think there are plenty of fish there because there are sharks there I think it's the other way around :)
Unbelievably beautiful. Mr. Von Wong is one of those rare people whose work makes me want to quit my day job and pursue my passion, as well as reminds me that my lack of talent renders this unwise ;-)
I wouldn't ever model in a white robe surrounded by sharks, not even for 10 millions euros .. now that does not mean I'm for the killing of the sharks, quite the contrary . The climate change series is awesome , the ironing on the prairie I just love . Good work Mr Wong
Ben, will be more than happy to share what Marc is thinking of you:-) when I saw him in May, we talked about you a bit and he rates you among the best photographers outhere today. Btw, is there a way to drop you a short personal note?
My next project will be a Transvestite having a transhuman/animal hybride baby in a sea of molten lava during a monsoon in Hawaii as the sun is rising creating a rainbow of color not seen by the human eye... Try and beat that, Benjamin.
Thank you for your support but I will need more than luck to pull that one off... I may have to travel to the 4th dimension to make it happen. But seriously, what would be realy spectacular? Seeing a combination of fire & water, like a flametrower underwater (if at all possible) in wathever scene that would be appropriate... Brain fart? May be. Good luck on your next venture. :^)
There is a problem I see in these pieces that I see often in this style, and that is the editing. To me it seems overdone an gives it a fake look, which is a shame because of all of the effort put in to do it all in camera. I don’t mean the subject matter either, I mean the soft-focusish filters, the HDRish feel, and all that wide angle perspective distortion all just doesn’t work for me. They seem like they could all use lot of burning and dodging too on those burning highlights too.
There are a lot of people saying it looks like CGI and I agree. I see it in the climate change series too: cool concept with a ton of work put in to NOT fake things, then a ton of editing that then makes it look fake. I feel there would be much more of an impact if they were edited to look like the beautiful pictures they are rather than some 3D composite from deviantart. I would love to see the raw files for these.
But what do I know, I’m just some photographer, no one is writing articles about me.
one day rbach44, your work will be put in the headlines. from time to time, there are reader showcase here. you can be next to share the world your vision.
Jonathan: Do you believe in general, that in order to justifiably critique members of a class, one must oneself be a member of that class? If I'm not an author, may I critique their work? If I'm not a presidential candidate may I critique Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton?
Photographers can see this overshopped stuff, normal mortals cannot comprehend and just think in "ahhh wow". There are so many photoshopgraphers that only survive because of photoshop. When it comes down to photography, it is mediocre at best. Especially in "fashion" and glamour.
Benjamin, all the best with this endeavour. It's great to see talent being put to use for an important cause. I can't believe in this day and age we are still having to chase hunters of shark fins, rays, elephant ivory, rhino horn and many others. Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on advocacy through art, potentials and pitfalls, promotion vs preaching etc. It would be something I would love to do but wouldn't know where to begin.
It's going to be quite a journey for you then. I look forward to seeing where your travels lead. Indeed it's you and your story, and how you achieve your images as much as the work itself that creates the interest, the connection. Meaningful. That's actually a tricky one to pin down and will change for you over time.
Wong uses earth themes a lot. Fire and ice, Wong does a lot of that. I guess he could do some earth shots of the northern Nevada gold mines, back to his roots. Been following him on flickr for quite a while, but he hasn't uploaded much these days. I did work in a under ground gold mine in Elko as a summer job and the underground mine are actually cool.
Been trying to make work that is more meaningful. Turns out it's a lot harder to travel to an exotic country to champion a cause than it is to find a pretty model and a cool location. XD
On the flip side, I do sometimes kick myself in the butt for spending more time in preproduction and emails , preparing press releases, etc... instead of getting out there to shoot more.
keep up the good work. Being original is always a change to be inspired. Plus shooting image sooc without Photoshopping sharks or other stuffs like other digital artist is purer photography. You are on the edge of that style of keeping it real and fantasy (but not Photoshopping item too much in).
I would really appreciate if you took the time to link to the petition - It's nice to share the process but the purpose of the entire photoshoot was to hopefully get people to support the creation of shark sanctuaries.
Thankfully we don't decide to kill 100 million dogs a year by cutting off their legs and letting them bleed to death while suffocating on their own blood.
Did you know dogs kill more people in the US a year than sharks do in the entire world?
But, as for Mr. VonWong's mission to make us like sharks, I can only paraphrase lines from movies: "Sometimes you eat the shark, sometimes the shark eats you." And, "Sometimes they go away, sometimes they don't go away."
The thing that strikes me about photography like this (not so much the underwater scenes, but others on his site) is that they look like stills from a CGI-enhanced movie. I look at something like "Lookout" (near the bottom of his home page) and can't help but think that movies like Avatar or Peter Jackson's Tolkien catastrophes consists of 100,000 shots like this (or better). I don't find them any more interesting/engaging than I would a random still frame taken from a movie. String thousands of them together, add dialogue and a soundtrack, and you might have something interesting.
He's obviously skilled and apparently successful. And I'm sure people who like his work would wonder what I find interesting in some of the photography I enjoy.
Considering that 90% of my work is self-funded on a shoestring personal budget, I take the comparison to Avatar or Peter Jackson's Tolkien where the coffee budget was 380,000$ as a high compliment!!
I understand what you mean but simultaneously disagree somewhat. Yes, some of the images look a bit like CGI, but I don't think "Lookout" is one of them. It is actually nicely layered, something you rarely see in CGI. In addition to that, a well composed and executed image can do more that adding thousands of shots in front and after the frame creating a movie. With a single frame, your imagination can take over, while in a movie the director guides the viewers. On another note, people looking for the "film look" in the future, may look back at CGI and find that nostalgic.
Very strong, engaging stuff. My admiration goes as much to the creator, the photographer, as to those who worked in this underwater production, most especially the model. Girl of steel, me thinks.
I have read all comments and wanted to share some of mine. I have seen his work about 1-2 years ago and was very inspired because it was different. I think his videos and his passion that you see is what makes him special to me. He is not a Landscape photographer, but I know he is also an inspiration for big name landscape photographers, such as Marc Adamus. What makes him different is his ultimate passion and his kind heart. He is using his talent to make a different and he is inspiring many people around him.
It was an interesting experience for me to witness how others perceive him.
His editing style is not that much relevant. Some people like it, some don't. I think you also need to consider the demand. This particular style could be something that others want to pay for. It was always like this - artists simply answer the demand and in some cases create it.
Ben, will be more than happy to share what Marc is thinking of you:-) when I saw him in May, we talked about you a bit and he rates you among the best photographers outhere today. Btw, is there a way to drop you a short personal note?
I have tremendous respect for anyone who actually makes something or completes a project, so I give him that, but these images as well as the ones I looked at on his site simply do not elicit an emotional response from me. They are vaguely interesting to look at but have no impact or meaning to me. I am disinterested.
I find it rather amusing how many photographers think there so artistic and creative when most take snap shots with high end gear and mess around in photo shop a little ... Its funny how they say there telling a story when all there doing is documenting an event.. Von Wong is a true artistic photographer his images are worthy of fantasy art and graphic novel covers..
I find it amusing how so many people try to make a point with words but end up with a whole bunch of grammatical errors. I'm having a hard time reading what you've typed.
Yes, there are photographers, and then there are artists and some of the artists use photographic cameras to do their art, and some photographers use as well cameras to photograph someone else art.
That is the thing, photography as is isn't art, neither is art as is photography. Two separated things.
Just like if you are a painter, you can be a landscape painter, portrait painter, composition painter etc, you can be a photographer who is a landscape photographer, portrait photographer.... etc.
And photographer can have artistic eye, by not doing anything by themselves they can still capture amazing photographs from what they see. Just like a painter can have artistic eye, by not inventing anything by themselves but they can still paint what they see in amazing way.
But the difference between painter and the photographer is that the photographer works often with other people who create and visualize and brainstorm together. While painter usually works alone.
I find it amusing you have "art" in your handle and no URL or galleries, and apparently no idea of what art is.
Von Wong is creative and this work is artistic but the message about shark's is coarse and I don't think particulalry great as visual art (but who am I? No one right? YMMV).
The value is for a company that want's to produce an difficult to produce image they know they can go to VonWong and say, here's $200,000 please make us a photo like this and he will.
His value is as a determined problem solver with the judgement to be able to assess the possible from the currently not possible, and the engineering and people skills to then get it done safely. That's where my admiration for Von Wong comes from. Not sure if he is a commercial photographer in the traditional sense, but it you want companies to give you $100Ks that's what it takes. Epic image engineer. His words. Technician? for sure. Artist? - all photographers are.
Yes, he doesn't make realistic looking photographs, but that is one genre in the photography that you can make something unreal. Just like illustrators, comic artists etc are there to create something unreal with visually interesting style.
Von Wong has made the name already for himself with style that many other has used as well to make their names. It isn't bad thing or negative thing, it is just that he is good in that and he likes it.
Actually, I think what really made my name was not so much the final results as much as the process. I don't think my work is particularly better than anyone else's except that the process and how I get there is usually accompanied by a full blog writeup and behind the scene video that strives to take the viewer on an emotional journey. As with a lot of my work - they wouldn't be nearly as exciting without a Behind the Scene video.
Well, yes I do agree that the background thing is very nice addition there. Especially on the modern era where your gallery is web and your description is as well in the web. Like when you stand in the gallery listen the photographers describing their work to the photo that is hanging next to them, it gets fairly boring soon unless the photographer knows that they can be opened up to own stories.
In my humble opinion is that after watching (cathed on ;) ) few videos from your work, it became little too overwhelming because they were so tight about the process (in very good manner I mean) and I liked more about simply browse your photos as I have use to do so first. But I really liked that You did not talk about the gear so much, just basically mentioning the flashes the idea and then just the work. But the interesting part as well was that You have left away the computer part like some sketch artists does those speedruns when they draw. :)
I've seen a few different approaches to swimming safely with sharks, mostly involving clothing that mimics the appearance of deadly or unsavoury creatures.
This is the first approach I've seen that employs clothing designed to make the shark think "WTF???"
While I appreciate Von Wong's creativity and how he pushes boundaries (usually of safety)... is it just me or do the images, especially the model and the dress look totally manipulated/illustrated. Not photo realistic at all. The look is of the environment being captured with a camera and the model/dress being inserted by hand. Why go to all the trouble if the end result looks faked?
No, photoshopping them would be missing the point. They are real, and that adds a great deal to the context. Indeed the fact that they are real is the point.
I think people are missing the point. I can understand if his images are "just not your thing", but I tend to think of him as an artist using his camera as an artistic tool. He certainly creates something unique, which appeals to me and the camera is just one step of his creative process.
Yeah, what I'm getting at is that it doesn't sit right visually. I don't even know if it's edited or not. Maybe they looked like this straight out of camera. Maybe it's just the lighting making it look that way. Bottom line is it could have been lit/edited/shot/created in a way where the subject and environment were seamless to give realism to the final product. Not my cup of tea, but it may taste fine for others. That's cool. I still have respect for what Von Wong does.
He has taken the raw image and styled it to be consistent with his previous work, and expression of what he wants to achieve with it. He is very successful, and so would want to give this image the same success and impact that has worked for him in the past to promote a cause that seems to be close to his heart.
But like any image and style of photography it comes down to personal taste. It's a great shot, is it over-cooked? To me no, but to you yes, which is cool :-)
Interesting discussion btw, thanks DPReview for posting this.
He seems to use the photography as a starting point like a real world, and the photoshop is his tool like canvas and brushes are for painter.
And then he sketches with the camera the look he is after, getting enough details and shapes to the image that he can take to the photoshop and start working with it to create his art.
The camera is like a sketching dummy, and then you just do your style around it.
Because women in white dresses holding a shepherding cane corralling sharks is real? So should be documented as such? Lol. Von Wong is a master at the fantastical. Conceptualizing and bringing to fruition photos with such imagination and technical ability that they scream "they can't be real". I can't imagine the images he got were easy to get. Sure. You could cgi everything in, but then he would be a digital illustrator, not a photographer.
The purpose of the photograph was to ignite a conversation around sharks, and hopefully get more signatures for a petition to champion their protection (www.sharkshepherds.com)
To do that, the photo had to be interesting enough and the approach unique so that people would pay attention to it.
As far as the editing goes, I'm not a huge fan of human skin being blue so I took the creative liberty of manually bringing those back up to "surface tones".
In case you were curious, here's a GIF of RAW->Lightroom -> Photoshop
My general goal is to create a pretty final result that gets people to dream. To dream of travel, of adventure, of creativity. I want people to be transported, but I also want them wondering how it was done. Is it real? Is it fake?
After that - you can't please everyone. That's just the way it is :)
It is nice to see the GIF about the original and the step between final work. As yet that as well shows how you need to make the photograph as it is difficult to get everything in the camera at once. Like in this case it was little surprising how low light situation it was, as the video gives little different immersion of it that it is difficult to remember that sometimes the photograph is far from the final one.
@fri - the reason for the underexposed shot is that similar to shooting in bright sunlight, you need to make sure that the highlights aren't overexposed. While I would have loved to capture a brighter shot in camera, I didn't want a mess of an overexposed dress. The video doesn't need to capture a perfect frame, just a series of stories. The photo lives forever as a static frame so at the very least, it needs to look balanced (personal opinion)
A production copy of the Canon EOS R10, the company's newest entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera, has arrived in Canada. Chris tells you what you need to know, including how the R10 stacks up to the competition.
The Sigma 20mm F1.4 DG DN Art has solid build quality, some useful functions and weighs less than you'd expect. Does it take pretty pictures though? We have the answers.
The Panasonic GH6 is the latest in the company's line of video-focused Micro Four Thirds cameras. It brings a new, 25MP sensor and 10-bit 4K capture at up to 120p. We've put it to the test, both in the studio and out in the field.
Is the MSI Creator Z17 the MacBook Pro competitor Windows users were hoping for? In our tests it delivers big performance and offers a few good reasons why you might choose a 12th-Gen Intel laptop over a Mac.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Drill Sergeant Chris Niccolls is back, this time in all-new Technicolor, to teach you cadets the basics of photography. This time around he's here to help with the ins and outs of white balance and perspective.
Have you ever come away from a busy shoot, wishing you could pay someone else to do all of your editing? Imagen might be just what you need. Click through to watch wedding and commercial photographer Jon Taylor Sweet use the power of Imagen to automatically edit photos from an engagement shoot.
Samsung's new Odyssey Ark monitor is the ideal display for customers who love to live on the cutting edge of technology. The 55" curved display is massive, bright, fast and impressive. It's also $3,500.
Sigma's 24mm F1.4 DG DN Art lens is solid and well-built. We took it around the Emerald city to see the sights and to prove that it doesn't always rain in Seattle. Check out our sample gallery to see how this optic for L-mount and Sony E-mount performs.
Sony’s Xperia Pro and Pro-I smartphones have received an update that adds new professional monitoring overlays to the devices’ built-in monitoring capabilities for select Alpha camera models, as well as the ability to livestream to YouTube.
Shortlisted entries for the annual Astronomy Photographer of the Year awards were recently announced. Overall winners will be revealed on September 15th.
Our team at DPReview TV recently reviewed the new Canon EOS R10 mirrorless camera. Check out these sample photos shot while filming their review and let us know what you think of the R10's image quality.
A production copy of the Canon EOS R10, the company's newest entry-level APS-C mirrorless camera, has arrived in Canada. Chris tells you what you need to know, including how the R10 stacks up to the competition.
Photographer Mathieu Stern loves the strange and unusual. He also enjoys DIY projects. He combined these passions by turning a disposable camera lens into a cheap lens for his mirrorless camera.
Camera modifier and Polaroid enthusiast Jim Skelton wanted to use the affordable Instax Wide film but didn't want to use a cheap, ugly Instax 100 camera. He hacked together the Instax 100 and a stylish bellows-equipped Polaroid Model 455.
Autel has released firmware updates for its Lite+ and Nano+ drones. These include accessible flight logs, the ability to turn off voice notifications when using the Sky app and an increase the maximum flight distance.
CineD's new video tour and interview with Sigma's CEO Kazuto Yamaki offers fascinating insight into the building's design and Sigma's philosophy toward creating better imaging products. Yamaki-san also talks about Sigma's new F1.4 prime lenses, Sigma's Foveon sensor and the ongoing chip shortage.
We've shot and analyzed our studio test scene and find the X-H2S gives a performance very close to that of the X-T4, despite its high-speed Stacked CMOS sensor. There's a noise cost in the shadows, though, which impacts dynamic range.
The Sigma 20mm F1.4 DG DN Art has solid build quality, some useful functions and weighs less than you'd expect. Does it take pretty pictures though? We have the answers.
The latest version of Sigma's 20mm F1.4 Art lens comes with substantial improvements, especially for astrophotography. Check out our gallery, including some astro images, to see how it performs!
Canon has partnered with Takara Tomy, the company behind Transformers, to release a run of Canon EOS R5 mirrorless camera models that transform into Optimus Prime and a Decepticon.
Midwest Photo was robbed late last week after a stolen truck broke through the store's front entrance. The store is in the progress of recovering from the damage and stolen goods. Photographers should be on the lookout for any suspicious product listings online.
OM System Ambassador Peter Baumgarten visits the wetlands of central Florida to photograph birds with the OM-1. Travel with Peter to see how he shoots, and view some of the spectacular photos he captures along the way. (Includes sample gallery)
We go hands-on with Sigma's latest 'Digital Native' wide-angle lenses for L-mount and Sony E-mount cameras to see what features they have and what sets them apart from the rather limited competition.
Sony has announced in-camera forgery-proof photo technology for its a7 IV mirrorless camera. The technology, aimed at corporate users, cryptographically signs images in-camera to detect future pixel modification and tampering.
CRDBAG's CRDWALL is a thin, space-efficient storage solution that you mount on your wall. It uses tracks, cords and hooks to store your gear flat against the wall without hiding it from view.
The new Sigma 24mm F1.4 DG DN Art has a brand new optical formula designed for mirrorless cameras. Check out our sample gallery to see how sharp it is, as well as how it handles flare, chromatic aberrations and sunstars.
Sigma’s new 24mm F1.4 DG DN lens for L-mount and E-mount features a physical aperture ring that can be de-clicked, stepping motors with full support for Sony MF assist modes, a rear filter holder and more.
Comments