When fast-ish is fast enough: in praise of F1.8 lenses
Going back decades, well-heeled amateur and hobbyist photographers have lusted after fast prime lenses. Partly this is just human nature. In the days when most cameras shipped with standard 50mm F1.8 or F2 lenses, it was inevitable that such photographers would long for something a little more exotic. A little faster, more expensive, and more 'professional'. For photography obsessives that grew up idolizing the famous LIFE magazine shooters of the late 20th Century, it was natural to aspire to own those kinds of lenses, despite their price.
There is still a demand for F1.4 and faster lenses, but that's not the same thing as saying that there is a need for them
Partly though, the appeal of fast lenses is practical - regardless of your ability level or income. They let in more light, and more light, even today, is always good. In the film days though, you really needed every stop. For a long time, anything above ISO 400 was considered 'fast', and shooting so-called 'high speed' film involved compromises, in color rendition, grain and contrast. For photographers that needed to work in changing conditions, an F1.4 or even F1.2 lens was valuable insurance against missed opportunities created by a lack of light. Never mind that many of the F1.4 and F1.2 lenses of the film era were pretty soft wide open - a slightly hazy photo is better than no photo at all.
But today, two decades into the 'Digital Century', is there still a need for ultra-fast lenses?
Fast lenses continue to sell, and technically of course, the F1.4 and F1.2 (and faster) primes of today are far superior to the designs that came before. Standout examples of the current state-of-the-art include Canon's superb RF 50mm F1.2 and EF 35mm F1.4L II, Sony's GM 24mm F1.4, and Sigma's 35mm F1.2 'Art' among many others. Tamron's new 35mm F1.4 is another stunning lens, and don't let a Pentax fan catch you suggesting that the FA* 50mm F1.4 SDM AW is anything less than perfect. Technically speaking, all of the lenses I just mentioned are among the best of their type that you can buy.
|Canon's EF 35mm F1.4L II USM is a stunning lens - in fact arguably the best 35mm prime on the market. If you're a Canon shooter, and you're one of those people that really needs F1.4, this is the lens to get. But for most of us, it might be overkill.|
Clearly, then, and partly for that reason, there is still a demand for F1.4 and faster lenses, but that's not quite the same thing as saying that most photographers still have a need for them. I suggest that these days, with the modern BSI-CMOS sensors inside most full-frame interchangeable lens cameras, the average full-frame photographer will be fine with F1.8. And might actually be better off.
To explain why I think that, I'll break down the three traditional arguments in favor of fast lenses:
1: Faster lenses let in more light, and more light is always good.
This is a fact. More light is never a bad thing, and the 2/3 of a stop which demarks an F1.4 lens from an F1.8 lens is not insignificant.*
Consider the practical implications of shooting at F1.4 versus F1.8: First, you'll be able to shoot at faster (shorter duration) shutter speeds. Assuming a constant ISO sensitivity, an increase in 2/3 of a stop of aperture means the difference between shooting at a shutter speed of 1/25th of a second and shooting at 1/15th.
That's potentially quite handy if, for example, you're shooting with a 28mm lens. Without any form of stabilization, you'll probably be able to hand-hold your shot at 1/25th, but you might struggle at 1/15th. So in marginal light, shooting at F1.4 will give you a little bit more peace of mind.
The second practical implication is that more light coming in through the lens means that assuming a fixed shutter speed, you can shoot at lower ISO sensitivity settings. Two thirds of a stop is the difference between ISO 640 and ISO 400.
But do you care these days about the difference between shooting at ISO 640 and ISO 400? Or ISO 1,600 and ISO 1,000? Or even 160 and 100? The increased performance of modern sensors at high ISO sensitivity settings means that the days when you really needed to keep your ISO ultra-low for acceptable results are (fortunately) over. As such, when it comes to light gathering, the advantage of an F1.4 lens is less important now than ever before. That's assuming you're shooting with one of the new generation of BSI-CMOS sensors, of course, with dual-gain architectures.
2: Faster lenses make for more attractive images
But of course you know all about F-stops, and the reason you're interested in an F1.4 lens is not for its technical advantages when it comes to pushing your exposure envelope, but for its aesthetic advantages. Specifically, shallower depth of field and blurrier backgrounds at maximum aperture.
This is fair enough - if you consider two lenses of the same focal length, one an F1.4 and one an F1.8, the F1.4 lens will deliver blurrier backgrounds, assuming a constant camera to subject distance. Physics again.
However, the difference between the appearance of background blur at F1.4 vs. F1.8 isn't as great as all that. It's highly dependent on camera to subject distance of course, but in general, I'll bet that most people, if they saw a photograph shot at either F stop setting in isolation, would be unable to identify the aperture setting you used.
Look at the example above. The image on the left was shot at F1.8, the image on the right was shot at F1.4. The crop is from an area just to the left (her left) of our model's head.
The two images look different, certainly. But are they that different? Meanwhile, the marginal increase in depth of field at F1.8 over F1.4 may actually be advantageous for some photographic situations - especially portraits like this, where even a slight sharpness difference between your subject's eyes can be distracting.
3: A faster lens stopped down is sharper than a slower one is wide open
Traditionally, this is true. No lens is technically at its best when shot at its maximum aperture. Stopping down a touch is good practice if you want to achieve better overall sharpness, cut down vignetting, minimize some common aberrations, and you don't mind losing a tiny bit of background blur in return.
Again though, these days, you may find that the difference between an F1.4 lens stopped down to F1.8 and a good F1.8 lens wide open is minimal. Looking at the best of today's crop of F1.8 primes their performance wide open is extraordinary. When examining images from the Nikon Z 85mm or 50mm F1.8 S or the Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA, its obvious that compared to the 'kit' primes of the old days, they're in a different league. Some of this is down to the increased design flexibility that mirrorless technology brings in terms of automatic software corrections, but not all.
At the end of the day, an F1.8 prime that is sharp and contrasty across the frame, which offers pleasant bokeh and lacks significant fringing when shot wide open is - I would argue - a much better value proposition than a more expensive F1.4 or F1.2 lens which needs to be shot at F1.8 or F2 for optimal results.
Disadvantages of ultra-fast lenses
Hopefully I've challenged some of the conventionally accepted advantages of faster lenses, but to further bolster my case I want to look at their outright disadvantages.
There are three: size, weight, and cost.
Lenses with a maximum aperture of F1.4 or faster are typically larger, heavier and as I've hinted at above, more costly than F1.8 or slower equivalents. The image below, showing Canon's EF 50mm F1.8 STM next to the RF 50mm F1.2L USM is an extreme example, but nevertheless, if you see a 50mm F1.2 (or F1.4) and a 50mm F1.8 in a particular company's lineup, you can bet that the F1.8 will be the lighter, smaller and cheaper of the pair.
I don't want to pick out (or pick on) particular brands here, but Nikon's Z-mount prime lens range is worth looking at in the context of this discussion because it currently only consists of F1.8 options (pending the arrival of the manual focus 58mm F0.95 Noct, which is a bit of a special case).
Of Nikon's three currently available Z-mount lenses, the Z 50mm F1.8 S and Z 85mm F1.8 S are, in my opinion, optically outstanding in almost every way that a photographer should care about. The Z 35mm F1.8 S isn't quite in the same league when it comes to CA suppression, but it's still excellent. The combined cost of all three of these lenses is $2,250 (not inclusive of tax). That's only $150 more than the MSRP of Canon's admittedly stunning, but undeniably massive RF 50mm F1.2L, shown above. Meanwhile the combined weight of the three Nikon lenses comes in at only 300g more than the Canon 50mm on its own. And around 800g (about 1.7lb) less than the expected weight of one Nikon Noct, (pictured at the top of this article) if you're playing that game. We don't know how much the Noct will cost yet, but let's assume it will be significantly more than $2,250...
If you want a really fast, flagship prime lens, be prepared to pay for it, in more ways than one
Clearly this is an imperfect comparison, drawn only to make a point. But hopefully you do get my point: If you want a really fast, flagship prime lens, be prepared to pay for it, in more ways than one. And ask yourself first - how much do you really need that extra stop or two of light?
Just one more thing...
Speaking of price brings me to a flaw in my argument - or at least to a caveat: The fact that all other things being equal, an F1.8 lens is likely to be cheaper and smaller than an F1.4 or F1.2 equivalent is unsurprising, and in itself proves nothing. What has proved surprising to some of our readers is that fact that the best of today's crop of F1.8 primes for mirrorless systems are more costly than their D/SLR-era F1.8 equivalents. In fact, in some cases they're more costly than their F1.4 D/SLR-era equivalents.
Nikon's Z 85mm f1.8 S, for example, costs almost exactly twice as much as the still-current AF-S 85mm f1.8G. Meanwhile, the AF-S 50mm F1.4G is a fine lens, and still available new for around $400 - that's 2/3 of the cost of the Z 50mm F1.8 S. Sony's new FE 35mm F1.8 costs $750 - that's more than Sigma's 35mm F1.4 'Art' - still one of our favorite fast prime lenses, even seven years after its introduction.
Sharp and free of distracting flare even when shot almost wide open, Sony's new FE 35mm F1.8 is one of the most useful lenses for Sony's mirrorless interchangeable lens system.
Why is this so? The reasons are various. There's the the overall loss of value in the digital photography industry which has seen volume at the low end of the market disappear, driving the prices of high-end products up. The need to recoup some of the R&D costs of developing entirely new mirrorless mounts, the fluctuation in the value of the Japanese Yen over the past decade or so, and other factors.
$800 spent now on one of the current crop of state-of-the-art mirrorless lenses buys you more than $800 ever has
But let's not lose sight of a really important fact, independent of all that: The newer lenses mentioned above tend to be superior to equivalents that came before. While $800 is clearly a lot more cash than $400, $800 spent now on one of the current crop of state-of-the-art mirrorless lenses buys you more than $800 ever has. As such - especially if you're a Nikon Z or Sony FE mirrorless shooter - I would argue that it's time to leave behind the old idea that faster always equals better and take this opportunity to downsize.
Look out for part 2 to this article, if I ever get time to write it - 'Hey Canon and Sigma, how about some more compact, high-performance F1.8 primes?'
* In fact, 2/3EV is the difference between Four Thirds and APS-C.
I own it
I want it
I had it
I own it
I want it
I had it
I own it
I want it
I had it
I own it
I want it
I had it
I own it
I want it
I had it
Both models feature a wired design for powering them from a wall outlet or other AC power sources.
The project provides an unprecedented look at New York as it existed more than 100 years ago by upscaling, increasing the frame-rate and colorizing century-old video footage.
Mathieu Stern recently discovered a time capsule in his family's home that had a number of 120-year-old glass negatives inside. To bring the images to life, Mathieu developed positive prints from the negatives using the cyanotype process.
The tech could 'significantly' improve compression efficiency and help improve the trust of JPEGs in a world where fake news is an increasing problem.
Today, the World Press Photo Foundation announced the nominees for its 63rd annual competition.
In honor of National Peanut Butter Lover's Day (yes, it's a thing—we checked), peanut butter manufacturer Jif has teamed up with GIF-hosting platform Giphy to release a limited-edition jar of peanut butter that's meant to settle the hard/soft 'G' debate once and for all.
Sony just launched its newest fast aperture wide-angle prime for its full-frame Alpha lineup, and we've been shooting planes, people and felines with it over the past few days. Read our initial impressions and check out our sample gallery. Spoiler alert: it's a near perfect optic.
Sony is adding a new wide prime to its full-frame E-mount series: the 20mm F1.8 G. It's slightly smaller and lighter than the existing FE 24mm F1.4 GM and will go on sale in March for $900.
The Kolude KD-K1 features four USB-A ports, two USB-C ports, an HDMI port, an SD card slot and a microSD card slot, all inside a slim, but full-size keyboard.
Despite receiving two camera kits, Stern wasn't able to capture many shots due to a faulty film advance wheel.
The 1.26x magnification ratio means Nikon F-mount lenses mounted to Fujifilm GFX camera systems using the adapters will keep their native diagonal field of view, albeit at the cost of 2/3 stops of light.
We did a lot of shooting with our pre-production Canon EOS-1D X Mark III, and now that the camera has official support, we've provided out-of-camera Raw files and some Raw-to-JPEG conversions for your perusal.
Sony is updating its flagship Xperia 1 smartphone with faster burst shooting, a bigger sensor in its standard camera and a time-of-flight sensor. And thanks to popular demand, the 3.5mm headphone jack is back.
Vox's seven-minute video shows how the work of photographer Lewis Hine brought attention to the brutal reality of child labor when it was at its peak in the United States at the turn of the 20th century.
We attended the recent launch of the Fujifilm X100V in London, where we had the opportunity to sit down with two senior figures within the company: Chief Designer Masazumi Imai and Senior Manager Shinichiro Udono.
The Nikon D780 is a two-trick pony: it combines the great DSLR experience of Nikon's D750 with some of the great mirrorless features found on the Z6. Does it manage to do both well? Chris and Jordan seem to think so.
Our new Nikon D780 gallery takes you to the Canadian Rockies for photos mountains, people and, of course, a couple of ducks. Because who doesn't love ducks?
Key to the technique, which is demonstrated in a new video, is Photoshop's Gradient Tool.
UK-based company Your Perfect Wedding Photographer recently released the results from its fourth annual industry survey. They published some key takeaways.
Forgoing Silicon Valley technologists, the Pentagon's Department of Defense is actively working on measures to identify and take down small drones that are a threat.
A few of the removals were a mistake, however, and Canon has since added some locations back on its list.
Flowers. Snow. Trees. Beer. Birds. Dogs. Humans. Printing presses. A giant ferris wheel. We've been using Fujifilm's XF 16-80mm F4 lens to photograph a big gallery with a little bit of everything in it – check it out to see how this versatile, water-resistant zoom lens performs.
After first teasing it at IBC2019, Sigma has announced its MC-31 PL-mount to L-mount adapter will start shipping February 27, 2020 for $679.
The SLR camera features an M42 mount and captures a circular image on Fujifilm's Instax film.
The Omnivision OV64C is designed to compete with high-resolution Quad-Bayer image sensors from Sony and Samsung.
The joint announcement was made by Olympus and Panasonic, who warmly welcomed the trio to the Micro Four Thirds System standard.
The M10 Monochrom is Leica's newest dedicated black and white rangefinder camera. Is it a street photographer's dream come true? Chris and Jordan take it to the mean streets of Calgary to find out.
Leica's new M10 Monochrom is a dedicated black and white camera with no color filter array. Combined with legendary Leica optics, it promises to deliver 41MP images in stunning detail. How much detail? Do some pixel peeping in our sample gallery.
The duo of brothers that makes up Abstract Aerial Art captures stunning images, mostly from the air. DPReview asks them about their process, advice for aspiring photographers, making money from your work and more.
The lens, which comes in at 20-percent shorter and 30-percent lighter than its predecessor, is set for a March release in Japan for ¥135,000.