Google's Pixel devices are usually cutting edge in terms of computational photography and the current Pixel 3 device comes with an entire range of computational imaging features, including the multi-frame-stacking Night Sight low light mode.
Recent Videos
Now it looks like Google is planning to take things one step further with the upcoming Pixel 4 generation and offer some kind of astrophotography feature.
A fuzzy screenshot of the leaked promotional video showing off a dedicated camera mode for capturing stars.
Pro Android has managed to get hold of what appears to be an (as yet) unreleased Google Pixel 4 promotional video. The clip highlights several software features of the still unreleased device, including a Night Sight-like astrophotography mode. Unfortunately, no technical detail is provided but it is fair to assume to mode will use some combination of frame-layering techniques and artificial intelligence to create well-exposed noise-free images of the night sky.
Huawei's current flagship P30 Pro already features a multi-frame star trail mode which is capable of achieving pretty attractive results in the right circumstances. We'll have to wait until October, when the Pixel 4 is expected to be launched, to find out if Google's solution is capable of improving on the Huawei feature.
I never cared about the design or material of a phone, the only thing that annoys me is a notch. That's the reason i never got the Pixel 3XL. But from a usage point of view, software integration and camera experience, all other phones (Android and iphones) come second to any Pixel. This year i am going for an orange Pixel 4 XL. Astrophotography? If Google nails this mode as well as Motion Mode like they did with Night Sight / HDR+, then I'm pretty sure other manufacturers will have fuming brains.
Computational Photography, far from being evil, is becoming essential IMO. Just take the case of Sequator for Astro, or focus stacking apps like Zerene. The sooner camera companies adopt such technology - Like Nikon and Fuji have with their physical Focus Stacking autofocus the better. And if you have never seen what focus stacking can achieve then try it, because the simple fact is that high megapixel FF cameras are unrelenting in demonstrating that the rules around hyperfocal and COC are no longer valid.
Small amounts of movement can be accomodated: but that's partly the point. Unless manufacturers include that in their camera autofocus everything basically has to sat still and its incredibly hard to do.
I meant "simulated" depth of field with multiple exposure focus stacking vs. stopping down where the entire image can be captured in focus with one exposure....granted within limits.
Focus stacking always gives better results in a scenario vs stopping down for a couple of reasons, firstly the lens can be kept at an optimum aperture to minimise diffraction and secondly the Circle of Confusion calculations inherent in hyperfocal calculations are completely inadequate for a 25 M Pix sensor let alone 60 or 100, so the resulting image looks "soft". The 1/3rd in rule simply doesn't work, and tell-tale sign is that the bottom of an image looks soft not just in the corners but in the middle bottom as well. Its quite likely too that focus stacking largely mitigates field curvature and focus shift issues in lenses, which is always a very difficult thing for a photographer to visualize in the field
However this will pan out, however impressive the technology may be....I want a ultra WA lens on the phone because that's extremely useful and sorely missing on Google phones. The rest is just gravy.
Wow great. So instead of buying a wide-angle super fast and expensive lens + a noise free full frame body I will just wait for this phone to be released :P
You see camera companies - this is what you need. Invest in computational photography ASAP or phones will just take the market from all but pro photographers...
Ai is evil! It is designed to change the perception of the human to a particular object definitions. Once your brain accept the new concept it can no longer tell the diference between a fake or real object. (I.e. weather engineered cloud vs real cloud). In 20-30 years human will live in a virtual Ai world! In other words, in a trance state!
It's not about the product. It's just irrelevant criticising technological progress because somehow it's going to be too expensive. How do you know what the application of this technology might be across other google products etc? Do you go on the Ferrari forums as well and complain about how the newest model is too expensive? So much pointless
Most likely star photography will be replacing your photo with similar one form existing photo database. It will Photoshop night sky into your landscape. Look grandma! I can take photos of distant stars with my telephone!
DPR News continues its unfortunate decision to be a rumour-plagiary site. Quite a few articles of that ilk recently.
Rumours always cause a lot of stress and arguing that often turns out to have been completely unnecessary.
That is why it is nice to have rumour-specific sites, which one can avoid if one prefers real news.
It would be much more enjoyable here if DPR left the fake news, and often simply manufactured news, that are both core pillars of rumour sites and all part of keeping a rumour site ticking, to the experts in obfuscation.
"a lot of stress and arguing that often turns out to have been completely unnecessary" @TNArgs, in a sentence you cracked the case and summarized the entire internet/social media phenomena. Although I would also argue about how most people spend their time on the internet and how ads are necessary to generate revenue.
So let me get this straight. Your saying in the name of public health that articles which are currently obviously based on speculation be removed from dpr. You know you could walk out your door and get hit by a bus right? The internet forums are a scary place to venture alone in, hold someone's hand
I couldn't care less about an astro mode. I care about focal length range (16-200 equivalent would be nice) and, secondarily, a flash that actually works as a flash (you know - lasts less than 1/1000th of a second like a Xenon flash).
All this computational nonsense does exactly nothing if the subject isn't resolved, lit or frozen.
I used to be a Google fan, but they have abandoned so many products as of late. They have lost focus and don’t seem to put much effort into finished products. They seem a fractured company with internal issues and political divide hampering success.
You don't seem to understand google recipe for success. "Fail Fast" is even their public statement. Try everything, see what sticks, kill the rest.
They have been doing that for years and have been pretty public about it. They even want to "fail faster" in the future. So if you don't like that, probably don't invest in a google service
Camera companies with hundreds of years combined experience in the photo business could learn a thing or two on account of their asses being kicked left and right by a newcomer like Google.
I'm sorry, but I have to say that whether I like it or not, Google actually has the absolute biggest influence on my everyday life and operations of any company. Between web browsing, news, Gmail, assistant, nest, Android Auto, Google Maps, YouTube, my business operations including advertising, back-end scheduling, etc, etc, etc... No other company comes close to the impact that Google has made.
so...this comment is a general sentiment towards Google and has nothing to do with the astrophotography mode. i assume you don't like this mode and prefer to invest in lindt&spruengli shares.
I've tried star photos in Night Sight mode on my Pixel 2XL. I can get the stars, but the AF doesn't reliably choose infinity due to lack of hardly any light. If I could lock on infinity then the picture might be at least decent. Certainly I can see stars in the photos and a landscape using night sight.
Install modded Gcam to get focus presets, manual mode, super res zoom, even better night shots (you can get even 40 photos in night sight instead of 9. it will be slower to capture like 5seconds but if you have time then results will blow you away) and a lot more features,
But someone that has Canon Rebel with 18-55 could throw it away;) And thats a huuuuuge step. Even 1" P&S with nice lenses like RX100V will have problem, I hope Sony will make PlayMemories again but now with open market for developers and nice API. GoPro is using Snapdragon 625 so phone chips are already in "cameras". RX100V has 24fps burst and nice buffer. Just imagine you could just shoot 1/13s exposures for some seconds (plus extra 1/400 for highlights) and app would stitch it together without any artifacts - thats how Night Sight on Google phones works. Not only that but its 20MPx with phase detect! Make it like dual-pixel so you would get depth information from entire image - then you would have a little bit fake bokeh/portrait mode without artifacts (you get those on phone, because it needs to blur so much). And most important thing - make camera a companion for your smartphone, not 1:1 replacement! We need RX100 with ultra wide angle zoom like 17mm-50mm which would be stabilized!
A 'stars' mode can actually be quite simple. Take a LOT of medium exposure images, look for all the bright lines (which will almost certainly be fuzzy due to lack of focus and atmospherics, movement, etc), and replace these with bright points. Do some alignment between the images, cancel out 'noise' (points not seen in a majority of images).
Now, that is already moderately 'bogus' from a reality point of view, however they can then start getting really 'computational' and increase the star numbers in areas depending on density, vary the colors to make it more 'interesting', even god forbid start adding some fake nebula, etc..
Pretty pictures would not be difficult.. Accurate pictures? not so much.
Why would they bother that much. They know the position and the orientation of the camera. They know the time. They just need to render all the stars in the given constellation and be done.
haha...yes, they know your position, just go to a star map and simulate everything for the customer...it will be like those astronomy apps but just simulated as a photo...
If somehow by some weird magic this mode his handheld than it will be pretty hard to argue that every other form of camera is just too cumbersome for everybody except the hard enthusiasts
You know compared to a PC and a mac, especially Mac's unwillingness to embrace a left and right click mice as a thing by this point, phone OS's are remarkably similar. You hit what is likely the only remaining button on the thing (sigh steve Jobs) to turn it on and then there's a screen full of icons which you click on to launch apps that are for all intense and purposes identical touch interfaces.
The web browsers are very similar too. The on-screen keyboards are a point of difference but apple has reluctantly put what nearly ever user prefers (basically an android default layout) if you so choose making them even more similar.
Are we really saying the iphone text message app with it's inability to let me download my texts for my own storage purposes independent of apple's cloud (which is near impossible to effectively search anyway) is so much better than the near-identical looking android text message app?
Anyone demanding iOS is weird to me. Like other things about the iphone
Android feels unpolished and wonky...not as good as an experience. And of course we know that Google loves to gobble up your privacy. I really wouldn't trust that everything done on an Android phone is not going to Google for marketing purposes.
+Thoughts R Us " I really wouldn't trust that everything done on an Android phone is not going to Google for marketing purposes." On your iPhone go to Settings > Privacy > Advertising and tell me what you see there. :) There you have LIMIT AD TRACKING. Not disable, but limit, and thats NOT enabled by default. Just like Google they are making your own ID and they analyze what you do, what you download etc.
Apple recently got in trouble for allowing any installed app on their phones to access the phone's cookies (which include call log, gps co-ordinates, etc) and relay them through the phone connection even when the app is NOT running. They promised to block the capability... for installed apps intended for minors only.
The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above?
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form.
Why is the Peak Design Everyday Backpack so widely used? A snazzy design? Exceptional utility? A combination of both? After testing one, it's clear why this bag deserves every accolade it's received.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above?
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
Sony's gridline update adds up to four customizable grids to which users can add color codes and apply transparency masks. It also raises questions about the future of cameras and what it means for feature updates.
At last, people who don’t want to pay a premium for Apple’s Pro models can capture high-resolution 24MP and 48MP photos using the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus. Is the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens or the ability to capture Raw images worth the savings for photographers?
Kodak's Super 8 Camera is a hybrid of old and new: it shoots movies using Super 8 motion picture film but incorporates digital elements like a flip-out LCD screen and audio capture. Eight years after we first saw the camera at CES 2016, Kodak is finally bringing it to market.
In this supplement to his recently completed 10-part series on landscape photography, photographer Erez Marom explores how the compositional skills developed for capturing landscapes can be extended to other areas of photography.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
Sony, the Associated Press and 'Photo Mechanic' maker Camera Bits have run a month-long field-test to evaluate capture authentication and a subsequent workflow.
A color-accurate monitor is an essential piece of the digital creator's toolkit. In this guide, we'll go over everything you need to know about how color calibration actually works so you can understand the process and improve your workflow.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
It's that time of year again: When people get up way too early to rush out to big box stores and climb over each other to buy $99 TVs. We've saved you the trip, highlighting the best photo-related deals that can be ordered from the comfort of your own home.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
Sigma's latest 70-200mm F2.8 offering promises to blend solid build, reasonably light weight and impressive image quality into a relatively affordable package. See how it stacks up in our initial impressions.
The Sony a9 III is heralded as a revolutionary camera, but is all the hype warranted? DPReview's Richard Butler and Dale Baskin break down what's actually new and worth paying attention to.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
DJI's Air 3 and Mini 4 Pro are two of the most popular drones on the market, but there are important differences between the two. In this article, we'll help figure out which of these two popular drones is right for you.
The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
The iPhone 15 Pro allows users to capture 48MP photos in HEIF or JPEG format in addition to Raw files, while new lens coatings claim to cut down lens flare. How do the cameras in Apple's latest flagship look in everyday circumstances? Check out our gallery to find out.
Global shutters, that can read all their pixels at exactly the same moment have been the valued by videographers for some time, but this approach has benefits for photographers, too.
We had an opportunity to shoot a pre-production a9 III camera with global shutter following Sony's announcement this week. This gallery includes images captured with the new 300mm F2.8 GM OSS telephoto lens and some high-speed flash photos.
The Sony a9 III is a ground-breaking full-frame mirrorless camera that brings global shutter to deliver unforeseen high-speed capture, flash sync and capabilities not seen before. We delve a little further into the a9III to find out what makes it tick.
The "Big Four" Fashion Weeks – New York, London, Milan and Paris - have wrapped for 2023 but it's never too early to start planning for next season. If shooting Fashion Week is on your bucket list, read on. We'll tell you what opportunities are available for photographers and provide some tips to get you started.
Sony has announced the a9 III: the first full-frame camera to use a global shutter sensor. This gives it the ability to shoot at up to 120 fps with flash sync up to 1/80,000 sec and zero rolling shutter.
What’s the best camera for around $1500? These midrange cameras should have capable autofocus systems, lots of direct controls and the latest sensors offering great image quality. We recommend our favorite options.
Comments