Canon has announced it will soon be releasing a new AI-powered plugin for Adobe Lightroom Classic that will be able to cull through images and sort them based on image quality.
The ‘Photo Culling’ plugin, as it’s so aptly named, uses Canon’s Computer Vision AI engine and ‘technical models’ to select images for ‘sharpness, noise, exposure, contrast, closed eyes, and red eyes.’ As the plugin analyzes images, it will flag the photos with different colored flags within Lightroom Classic for easier curation.
Canon says the settings will be customizable so photographers can ‘remain in complete control,’ but doesn’t elaborate on how exactly the parameters will be controlled. There’s no mention of whether or not this plugin will work with images captured with other cameras, but we’ve contacted Canon for clarification and will update this article accordingly when we hear back.
The Photo Culling plugin will be available exclusively on the Adobe Exchange App Marketplace in Q1 2020 for a monthly subscription.
The idea that any photographer would turn over any decision making to AI software seems incredibly ridiculous... let alone paying a monthly fee to do it. Can you have it just click the auto adjustments too?
I hope Canon didn't pay much for the music on this promo. Someone should have culled that out for them.
If this works, is reliable and accurate, it would be a good feature. However, I think that with the costly monthly subscriptions, Adobe should be providing this as an included feature and not a third party.
Of course I can sift through and tag any obvious miss-shots (for whatever cause) using the arrow keys and X, but often it is hard to tell whether shots are genuinely out of focus as LR can take many seconds before images pop into focus, that's with a fairly good PC (4GHz, 8 core, 16 threads, 32GB RAM, good graphics card, etc).
I've tagging shots on numerous occasions only to have them suddenly pop into focus afterwards, then I have to un-tag them again. So I sit and watch, wondering, will it? won't it? on a loop. That's very time consuming/frustrating.
Anything that helps reduce this without additional fuss, is welcome.
try out fast raw viewer, it's pretty cheap, and it's great for culling. it shows you a rendering of the RAW, you see directly the raw histogram. on my computer it takes 0.15s to change between pictures. it's really great.
Try importing photos with smart previews enabled. When you review your photos, they’ll render in blindly fast speed. It’s built into Lightroom, so no extra cost.
Automation of the photo culling can’t be for everyone taste neither fits all needs. But it can certainly save time and ease the life of many photographers. My company (https://camerafutura.com) has just released a new software with similar goals only few weeks ago. It is not a plugin and it is not linked to Lightroom. And whereas I admit humbly "it is just the beginning", new or improved features will be added in the next months. I will certainly follow what Canon will release. It is good not to feel alone anymore !
Why is it not available in Canon's DPP? This is a new bussiness model for a Camera manufacturer to make money out of software. The software they provide, sould be a complement for those who buy their hardware product.
No! Technically good photos are not always the best photos. Why would I want a machine to think for me?
One one forum there is post dedicated out of focus photos or shots blurred by camera or subject movement. Most of the photos submitted are good with a few outstanding. If you don't review them yourself, you might miss a diamond in the rough.
Most of us have 20x the photos we actually need. Even that may be conservative. The algorithm may bin some good photos yes, but as long as the ones it keeps are the ones you like....more often than not....just roll with it. The time saved will be so worth it. Spend that time, taking pictures instead of managing your library and don't stress about the potentially 2% better photo in your opinion that it threw away instead of kept. It probably wasn't that good anyway.
I definitely think it has a place, though I'm not sure I appreciate what seems like a purely AI solution. It will also automatically tag photos, too which may or may not be useful...or accurate.
Interesting. I use Excire https://www.excire.com An AI plugin which provides keywording and proved really helpful to me. Runs with Lightroom Classic CC and 6 :)
That is a AI keywording service... not a CULLING service... it is good in its own way - but not helpful to get rid of bad photos which is what this article is about.
Well, the article is both: - about a culling service - about an AI Lightroom plugin Don't assume what readers of the article are interested in. Thanks.
@falconeyes.. It just seemed like you were saying Excire is what you use instead of this new service... but Excire's is totally a difference type of plugin - that was my point. I mean - if you just wanted to share info about Excire - that's great and I may have misunderstood. Enjoy!
Coming soon: The new Canon EOS R2, with the new "Can-cel That" feature, where the camera refuses to take a picture unless the AI thinks it will be a good shot. Unleash your creative freedom 8-(
I would love to see how this works. Don't understand how useful or powerful this is. Half of the items that it uses to choose images seem pointless and have nothing to do with being a good image or not.
It has nothing to do with good or bad. It's about culling LARGE numbers of photos.
Here's an example. A sharp and perfectly exposed photo of a person who blinked (eyes closed) isn't very useful to most event photographers. If this speeds his delivery time—then it's very useful. If it tags photos with red eye, that makes it easier/faster to process—this helps with profit.
Many, maybe most, do NOT need this service—if it's not for you that's OK
you likely can't sell a technically imperfect photo as easy as at technically perfect photo, all things being equal. This is obviously marketed to professional photographers who , yes, care about if the photo is subjectively good, but also require that that subjectively good photo to be technically as prefect as possible if they want to sell it.
gravis92, but if a pro photographer chooses to shoot at a higher ISO, there must be a reason. So what's the point in having a program that will eliminate images with noise? What about contrast? How can a photo be better or worst depending on the contrast?
And if you're not using canon, adjusting exposure isn't a big problem most of the time. Wouldn't you prefer to adjust exposure on a good expression than getting a bad expression with good exposure?
And even sharpness... How will the program know where to look for sharpness? A photo can be sharp on the background but the photographer trying to focus on a person.
For me, that's where it all gets a little hard to understand. Most of those things seem easy for the machine to differentiate, but not something I'd use as a rule to decide if I want to keep a photo or not.
its not that hard to understand, for some people, they just don't have the time. More often than not, this program will get it right. There are tons of photos you don't get because you are not taking pictures at that time, the ones that this program culls that you wouldn't, well, just forget about them and move on and pretend they never happened too. Life will be much easier. Its not like their is a cost to taking any one digital photo. Free yourself from the computer.
gravis92 how do you know the program will get it right more often than not? That's what I don't get. How can the program get it right when it's using noise or contrast to select what a good photo is?
It's not, because you still have to look and see what was the best image. The best image it's not always the sharpest, most contrasty and with lower noise.
@Spectro - many industry photographers these days use spray and pray.... Ice Skating competitions for example... they provide families with the option to purchase... it is completely a "mash the button" business... and they are making a killing selling images because there are great moments captured in the mix of hundreds of bad ones... but, they don't care because they do get the good ones too at 20FPS.
If it does end up exclusive to Canon gear, I predict some enterprising smaller company or coder will take some off-the-shelf neural network engines, train them on a bunch of photos, and put out a free or cheaper version that works for any equipment. :-D
I don't see how it actually works. Is there a video demonstrating it rather than the promotional video showing how wonder it is? Much of my sports pictures are culled based on 1st focus, 2 interest, 3 action. BUT, interest and action could change based upon how it's cropped. Would the AI know that? Would it know the difference between action sports and athlete portraits?
Shhhhhhhh don't tell Csnon we crop photos as sports photographers. They said they made the 1DXMKIII at 20MP's because we don't want or need more..... shhhhhhhhhh
Shhhhhhhh don't tell Csnon we crop photos as sports photographers. They said they made the 1DXMKIII at 20MP's because we don't want or need more..... shhhhhhhhhh
@semajel That is correct. That's the easy one. But how much focus would it be to toss? There are times the focus is a little soft but I'll still keep it. Or, if focus is even on the crowd than the players, would it know the difference?
Give them credit for identifying a problem--that digital cameras create so many images, just the sorting is a major task. Hopefully, other manufacturers will follow.
Creating a lot of images can also be solved in the first place. 20 fps is not needed to get a good one. A good photographer can do the job with less actuations.
Would help me in wildlife photography - BIF stuff, where focus and wing position of a bird can vary wildly. I often sift through lots of out of focus or bad bird shots to get to the good ones.
My guess is that, it cost Canon just pennies to develop it as a plug-in. Al cameras do scene analysis for exposure and more ie;eye detection, blink detection, white balance check, contrast check and so on. They must have reorganised the already available data developed through the years and bundled it as a stand-alone plug-in. Any other camera company could have done it but Canon have thought of it first.
Why is Canon doing this for an Adobe product, and not incorporating it in its own DPP product? Much better if Canon would work with Adobe so that profiles for new cameras, such as the EOS M6II, become available in Lightroom (Lightroom does not recognise any of the Canon profiles for the M6II, so you have to use more generic Adobe profiles).
Strictly speaking, it is not made available for free to anyone, it is for Canon owners who can prove they own a supported Canon camera. You have to enter the serial number of a supported Canon camera in order to download it. If you own a Canon camera (or can find a serial number from some source), it is free to download, but clearly the intention is to limit it to Canon owners. But I guess that if you do not have a Canon camera on which you shoot RAW images, you would not want it anyway :).
My point was slightly different. Canon is using Lightroom as a platform for something it can monetise, but it is unwilling to make things easier for Canon users of Lightroom where it cannot monetise allowing Adobe to create Canon profiles for new Canon image formats. Canon could include it in DPP, but because this is not subscription based and they cannot charge for it, they are not doing it. Smacks of double standards on Canon’s part to me.
Yes, in the sense that the details of the M6 II CR3 files are proprietary and Canon will not provide the details to Adobe to enable Adobe to make the profiles available. They will probably become available in due course once Adobe works out how to reverse engineer them or whatever it is they have to do, but this will be despite Canon, not with Canon’s cooperation, even though the only people adversely affected are those who are relatively early adopters of Canon’s latest technology.
I agree. Many of us cull in Canon's sofware and also convert RAW's to TIFF because Canon's color conversion is excellent. Much faster then viewing in LR or Bridge.
yes, Canon should improve their DPP software and offer a "pro" version in addition to the free "basic" one.
I would gladly pay a sensible price for a permanent license of "DPP pro" - consistibg of excellent Canon RAW engine plus ingest functionality like Photo Mechanic with additional "AI" culling flags and auto-keyword tagging plus image efiting functionality exactly like LR classic's develop module and a single, intuitive user interface. one workflow app to handle any Canon raw file all the way to final image (jpg and HEIC!).
no bloated database and no messy plugins please.
since i only use Canon cameras (as probably vast majority of all Canon customers) it is all i'd need. would pay up to € 199 for permanent license plus € 99 for significant update every 2 years.
It's not for me, but it should be good for some photographers. As far as costs, if you already have an Adobe Cloud Account, this should be no-big-deal.
The goal of a good AI is not to replace humans... it is to augment/aid them. If this software can do the job reasonably well it will save tons of time for people.
E.g. only filtering out images were people have their eyes closed (especially in group portraits is already a huge time-saver. And the way color flags are applied should mean that it is very easy to verify the algorithms work.
If I would pay for it is another story... Apple does something similar in how they select what they think is the best photo in a burst scene.
I'm not trying to be "sour" when I say that I honestly just can't get into the mindset of trying to avoid looking at photographs I took.
"Let someone (or something) else choose your 'best' photographs" sounds, to me, too much like "let someone (or something) else just take them in the first place."
I'm sure other people see it differently, which is fine. But personally, I got into photography to actually *do* it. The whole thing. To have ideas, to plan, to shoot, to cull, to edit, to deliver, to look at what I did. Again: no judgments, but personally I have a hard time being interested in any technologies that push *me* out of *my* art.
Also, I'm skeptical that someone just blitzing through a take in Photomechanic or even a Capture One session wouldn't end up getting a faster final cull than the person who imports to Lightroom, generates previews, engages this system, and then reviews-approves-or-denies its various selections. Perhaps it will prove me wrong?
One drawback for me is that quite often large group photos will contain someone blinking, talking, looking the wrong way. If I’m lucky I’ll take 6 shots to get one where all are perfect.
If I’m on a tripod and the subjects haven’t moved significantly, then it’s easy enough to swap a few heads around.
I’d like to see an AI program that identified the blinkers etc, and then replaced them with better shots from a batch I selected. An AI auto head swapping app, that auto transforms, layers and blends the replacement heads in place.
..but I have to say it’s only really a problem with very large groups if they only have patience for half a dozen shots
Yes because most photographers love to spend hours and hours culling thousands of photos instead of being out and about shooting, spending time with family, earning money or whatever else is on your list.
I sometimes use 3 fps, are choosey about what you shoot and go out once a week. If you do that for 20 years, you will still have thousands of pictures. This software will be a big timesaver for me.
No. You won't. Not the good ones. (doesnt mean you're not goot, but it's my opinion). A wise man once said: "There stands *one* picture of the wedding on the fireplace. Only one. But a good one.
@vscd - I was referring to the amount of pictures before culling. After culling, you may only have 10% left worth publishing. I have seen wedding photographers work who shoot anywhere from 100 - 2000 pictures before they cull and the bride selects about 10.
When I shoot weddings I normally have about 400-600 pictures. And even that is quite a lot. Make good pictures, not many. Of course you have some fast scenes on throwing flowers etc., but coming home with 5000 pictures and complain about culling is not my taste of photography... But I'm coming from analog times. I know I'm a bad photographer of I only fire without concept. But what I do is culling at the place if I know I missed the shot.
Monthly subscription? really? so we will pay an AI to tell us how bad our photos are? maybe it will even send them to their servers to feed a huge database, like Google Photos?
Call me paranoid, but whenever a corporation states that I willl ‘remain in complete control', I see a big warning sign flashing inside my head.
And photography is standardised enough these days, we do not need machines to tell us how bad or good our pictures are... especially for a monthly fee.
You should do some research in what your camera already "automatically" does for you, even before you press the shutter button.
The only photographers truly in control are ones who shoot analog. The rest of us? Slaves to the algorithms of auto focus, auto exposure, lens corrections, distortion control, vignetting control, color science, demosaicing/debayering and the list goes on.
The majority of commenters here needs to get rid of their superiority complex.
I will use my eos 3 a few days a month for fun, and eye control works for me. Its generally ok most time and considering the year it was released, actually quite usable. I dont understand why it was dropped, if it was now they could likely make it work perfectly.
@ewelch, Stills resolution will steadily increase but how much resolution do you think shooters need for event and sports photography? Right now they use 20MP. 8K offers 32MP stills.
@Horshack, You don't need 8K to do that. You just need someone to implement it. If Reuters or AFP do it, everyone else will too.
@Grapejam The Digital Disk Recorder was used for Instant Replay in 1967. Today's technology is even better. Storage is a short term thing. The Digital Disk Recorder only a 30 second capacity. If they didn't use it for a play, it was erased, and started over. After an Agency Photo Editor reviews the shots, and Picks the Keeper, the rest will be erased. Unlike Photo Enthusiasts, News Organization don't keep everything—they throw away everything that doesn't make them money.
@ewelch These "video jockeys" have been providing the action for World Cup Football, NFL, NBA, NHL, NCAA, F1 Auto Racing, etc, etc TV Broadcasts for many Years.
@Horshack - You are quite right about how much resolution one needs for certain purposes (sports). More data pretty much means slowing you down on deadline and that's not a good thing.
Grapejam is probably on to something there. Resolution is not the be-all and end-all. There are many issues. When you shoot video you're thinking is different than when you are shooting stills. It simply is a fact that can't be overcome. Good video shooting is not the same as good still shooting. And treating stills as lucky hits from video is going to lead to mediocre still images.
It's nice to have but I'm not sure if I should trust machine to do this kind of stuffs. Slightly oof photos, off exposure photos but with good composition and expression are better than perfect technical photos but with bad composition and expression.
It just tag them for you, the final selection is up to you. I think it will be a great tool if the tagging will be as reliable as I think now it will be. :)
@08amczb - I'm not too sure that the tagging will be all that good if you have made an artistic decision which doesn't conform - say for example - 'Dutch' tilt, intentional camera movement (ICM), crushing shadows / blowing highlights, long exposures, star trails and so on - I think your level of confidence is a bit misplaced, no doubt it may work OK'ish for what one may call vanilla or standard situations.
@dabhand For that 50 artistic photo in a session you do not want to use this tool, but for a wedding with 5000 images it will be useful. (Although I think I won't use it nightere.)
All this does is group photos based on criteria e.g. "sharpness", "eyes open/closed", "focus", "noise". This will speed up manual selection. Where does it say it will select your best photos and throw out the rest?
It is an aid for manual culling, not a replacement.
There is a small chance we see adobe picking up the idea and integrating it into lightroom which could have happened a long time ago already. This is used in smartphones since a few years now, sad that the photography market is getting innovative features only very late.
Being cooped up inside doesn't mean you have to take a break from photography. If you've got negatives from way back when, what's the best software around to scan them? Check out our in-depth comparison to find out.
The Sony Alpha 1 is Sony's flagship mirrorless camera for, well, just about anything. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. Add in 8K video capture and you have a really impressive package.
The Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is a compact general-purpose lens for Sony's APS-C, E-mount mirrorless cameras. So how does it perform? Read our review to find out.
Sony's FE 35mm F1.4 GM is an impressively sharp and long-awaited pro-level 35mm optic for full-frame Sony E-mount cameras. It's well-built and is pretty compact, but it's still not quite perfect. Find out all the details in our field review.
The Sony a7S III is a 12MP full-frame camera primarily designed with video in mind. We take a look beyond the specs to see what it offers to filmmakers.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
Whether you make a living out of taking professional portraits, or are the weekend warrior who knows their way around flashes and reflectors, you'll want a camera with high resolution, exceptional autofocus and a good selection of portrait prime lenses. Click through to see our picks.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2500? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best.
A few days after Sony Nordic revealed the details of the 2.00 firmware update for the Sony a7S III, the firmware update is now live and ready to download.
Billed by Sigma as 'a more compact but still high-performing alternative to the existing 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN | Art' its new 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN is indeed considerably smaller and lighter than it's 'Art' series contemporary. Click through for a closer look at Sigma's newest zoom lens.
The sensors in the Phase One XF IQ4 camera system is currently the largest medium-format digital camera sensor on the market, and we've just put the 150MP model in front of our studio test scene. Want detail? You've got it. Check out how our new reference camera fares.
Pentax has released updated versions of three of its prime lenses, adding improved coatings and a more rounded aperture diaphragm for smoother bokeh. The updated 31mm F1.8, 43mm F1.9 and 77mm F1.8 'Limited' lenses will be available in April.
NASA's Juno spacecraft has been orbiting Jupiter since 2016. A recent image captured by the spacecraft and processed by a citizen scientist gives us a beautiful look at the gas giant.
Last year, Isaac Lowe-Anker, younger brother of photographer Max Lowe graduated from college, but like a whole generation of students in 2020, his graduation was virtual. In this video, Max takes his brother on a celebratory road trip across the Olympic Peninsula.
The GN2 builds upon the foundation Samsung's GN1 sensor offers with new and improved features and capabilities thanks to its Dual Pixel Pro and Smart ISO Pro technologies.
The Sigma 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN is small, but how does it perform optically? Chris has the answers. Meanwhile, Jordan begins his stint filming episodes with the Pentax K-01. Let the fun begin.
The Sigma 28-70mm DG DN F2.8 is a compact standard zoom for full-frame L- and E-mount bodies. We've been shooting with the lens on the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R so you can get a first look at its image quality.
Sigma has introduced its 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN Contemporary lens for L- and E- mount bodies. This small and light lens has numerous special glass elements, plus weather-sealing, and will be available in March for $899.
After landing on Mars on February 18, Perseverance has been busy. In addition to its first images, Perseverance has captured a 360° view of Mars using its pair of onboard 20MP Navcams.
Rode has released a new Wireless Go II kit, which comes with three units: a dual channel receiver and two transmitters. The updated kit features improved connectivity, onboard audio recording storage and more.
The Sony FX3 is a 'compact cinematography' camera built around a 12MP full-frame BSI CMOS sensor. It shares a lot in common with the a7S III, so what does it do to earn its place in Sony's 'Cinema Line?'
Sony has formally announced the much-leaked FX3 full-frame video camera. The FX3 marks the entry point to the Cinema Line of video cameras, and wears Alpha branding, setting it between the FX6 and the a7S III.
Following the launch of Sony's new Alpha 1 full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lens camera, we sat down (virtually) with Masaaki Oshima, Deputy Senior Manager of Sony's Camera division. Click through to read our in-depth interview.
An email sent by Sony Nordic to newsletter subscribers appears to have let the preverbal cat out of the bag — the a7S III will get Sony’s S-Cinetone color profile in a version 2.00 update.
Huawei's Mate X2 is the Chinese company's latest foldable phone. It incorporates a Leica-branded four camera array, complete with a macro and telephoto camera.
Laowa has expended the mirrorless camera mount options for two of its most popular manual primes: the Laowa 11mm F4.5 FF RL and the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra-Macro APO.
Professional wildlife photographer and Olympus Visionary Scott Bourne is one of the best-known names in bird photography. In this interview, he explains his background, and what he thinks of the new M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC1.25x IS PRO lens
As we press on with our full review, we've had a chance to shoot more with the Sony a1 and also process some of our Raw images to get an idea of just how much dynamic range it's capable of.
Hasselblad has launched a new video series, 'Hasselblad's Home,' offering a behind-the-scenes look at Hasselblad's headquarters and its products. The first episode focuses on the design philosophy of the X System.
Our intrepid DPRTV team up in Canada has been braving the freezing conditions to bring us a gallery of images from the new Panasonic S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS. Click through to see how they got on.
The Perseverance rover has successfully landed on Mars. The rover is in Jezero Crater, where it will spend its life exploring and analyzing the surface of Mars. The rover quickly sent back its first images.
The Lumix S 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 Macro OIS is a tele-zoom lens designed for Panasonic's full-frame mirrorless cameras. We've been using one for a few days - click through to learn more.
1854 Media and the British Journal of Photography recently announced 30 images, along with three bodies of work, as winners for the 2021 Portraits of Humanity competition.
Hamish Gill of 35MMC compares and contrasts the user experience of two medium format titans: the Mamiya 7 and the Plaubel Makina 67. But which does he prefer? Click through to find out.
Comments