PhotoMirage, a new product from software company Corel, transforms images into "mirages" by adding movement to elements, such as water or clouds. The software works in three steps, the company explains, only requiring the user to select the elements they want animated, isolate them from the rest of the image, then save the final product.
PhotoMirage does not require video footage (the way a cinemagraph does), instead animating a single static image. The software is designed to produce moving images "in minutes," Corel explains on its product website, enabling the user to choose the rate and direction of the movement using Motion Arrows. Plot Anchor Points are used to isolate images from movement, and a slider is used to manually adjust movement speeds.
The resulting image can be previewed, then either saved or shared directly on platforms like Instagram or through email from within PhotoMirage. The application costs $69.95 USD and comes with a free trial, but is only available for Windows 7 and higher.
It still counts as news, even though other companies have already created similar software. After all, it was news when Nikon created the D300s, even though Canon had already created th 7D. However, this looks like a paid advertisement because DPReview didn't acknowledge the competing software.
I think the Plotaverse app is not really free, you can play with it but if you want to download the final image, you have to subscribe (or at least you had to until recently, not sure right now). And if you want to use it on the desktop (Plotagraph) same thing, it's free to share on their own social network, but you have to pay a monthly fee if you want to download the file, which IMHO is overkill for this kind of thing (not to mention how slow it is, because all the rendering takes place remotely).
ZoeTropic is indeed a single-pay app, cheaper than Mirage for sure, but still, let's not forget it's an app (not a desktop program).
I'd like to give this Mirage thing a try, although I already played with the "free" version of Plotagraph some time ago (there was a free option, but they capped it later), and it felt like it was kind of a one trick pony.
Ok, I've seen Plotagraph has yet again changed their rules and it looks like you can do something without paying . On the other hand, I tried the Photomirage app, and while it's nice, I think it has some catching up to do. I hope Corel improves this product.
This is literally just Plotaverse... an app that has been out for years that creates this effect (and even better) for free. This is just a copycat that is trying to hop on the bandwagon of digital art. Buying this and not Plotaverse would be the equivalent of buying a pair of sketchers from Walmart (photomirage) when you have a closet of Free Nike shoes at your disposal (Plotagraph). What would you do?
It's O.K. if you don't like this type of art form. However, it seems a little out-of-place to express your dislike for it now or here. This form of art has been around for a while. This software can help people who enjoy this form of art. I don't see what's so great about the Mona Lisa but I don't mock it every time I get a chance.
entoman "Green Coca-Cola Bottles" by Andy Warhol is called art. So yea I can call a plotagraph art. I'm sure this lowers your opinion of me. I am so ashamed of myself.
Chatbot - I totally agree that you can call *anything* art - it's an entirely personal and subjective thing.
But there is good art - innovative, original, thoughtfully composed and well executed - and there is also extremely mediocre "art" whereby e.g. a very mundane overhead shot of a canoe (kayak?) can be manipulated in a very amateurish way to produce something even less interesting than the original snap.
It may well be possible for some talented person to conceive a great image in which plotograph software is part of the original design "formula", but the example given in this PhotoMirage promo is pretty mediocre, to put it mildly.
Incidentally, I don't have an opinion of you, one way or the other, you are entitled to express your opinion, just as I am, and it's not necessary (or intended) to take my opinion so personally!
There's an Android app called Zoetropic that is essentially the same thing if you can handle using a small screen. Plus it's got a free version and only $3 for full.....
I thought it was cool and I bought it. I see it being used in a variety of applications for blogging, company websites, etc. I rendered a couple of videos and it works really well for the nominal cost.
An interesting choice of image to illustrate the program capability: in the resulting "mirage" the boat appears to be moving BACKWARDS against the current, while the kayaker is clearly in the forward stroke position.
Yeah, this isn't something Corel came up with. It's called a plotagraph and it's been around for years. Corel just ripped it off and called it something different.
I've seen the same kind of results achieved using Adobe Premiere Pro but the catch was that the guy demonstrating the effect was quite a wizard and it was a pretty complex procedure. Like all special effects, they get boring if they're over-used. I think it would need a few other features before it was worth parting my cash for so I'll wait to see how the software develops.
I think the results are easier and better to achieve if you just record a movie instead of a photo but it would be funny to animate some old photos from wild wild west or the moon ;)
well this is not exactly a movie as just some parts has some movement. how would you record the kayak in the same place and the water moving around it? my editing skills are zero, just asking... maybe taking the first frame for the subject and doing something with the rest for the surroundings?
The effect was done using a still photograph, not a video. It's quite an interesting tutorial if you've got the time to watch it. https://youtu.be/m90MabRjBCY
I thought it's some kind of neural network, but Corel uses simple morphing with user-defined vectors.
The result is animated, yes, but the overall method is outdated and unimpressive. And 60 bucks is way too much for a simple morphing software, but it's just Me.
I downloaded the free trial. It does work pretty well and is easy to use without any noticeable bugs that we seem to find in a lot of new photo software. It is quite fun....
My guess is that that I will get bored of the effect before I have to buy it though....
@rationalist Those are great ideas ! May I suggest a function that put happy smiles on all the faces of your family on the photos taken at the latest family party :-)
Not bad! But I rather thought of marking objects which would begin to shake and you could select different types of rattling noises. Attention is everything.
is photography dying and digital manipulation taking over? it's a bit like music these days being able to sing and play and instrument is no longer a prerequisite
Thanks for the link - I've already done one and it looks pretty good. I imagine the novelty will wear off soon but even for €2.99 for the "pro" version it's quite a cool little app.
Looked att all the examples at their web site. The first time you see it, it is a neat illusion. But, the tenth time you see it it looks just awful. This can be a neat trick to e.g. have on your web site. It will always impress some.
Why do people expect companies to spend huge sums of money to develop software, only to give it away at next to nothing? Before making these silly comments ask yourself this: Would YOU work for any less money than you do now? It is $69.99, that is not a huge wad of money in the scheme of things.
SELEES, who said I wanted this software to be given away at next to nothing?
I wrote that this is software I will not have much use for, but I will probably support it by purchase (versus companies pushing subscription models) if they dropped the price by 25%, or $52.49–not exactly free or next to nothing.
Before making these silly comments please think twice before you press that Post button
Ask yourself if you were trying to show off how wealthy you are, that $69.99 is not a “huge wad of money?”
This amount is about a day’s work after taxes, and is steep for software that will rarely be used, if at all
when i was 5 i had a lamp with a shade that spun slowly due to heat rising on metal fins on top an inner sleeve gave the illusion of rippling and undulating of the overlaid image
We don't often get excited about $900 cameras, but the Fujifilm X-T30 has really impressed us thus far. Find out what's new, what it's like to use and how it compares to its peers in our review in progress.
The S1 and S1R are Panasonic's first full-frame mirrorless cameras so there's a plenty to talk about. We've taken a look at the design and features of both cameras and have some initial impressions, as well.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1X is a more powerful dual-grip evolution of the E-M1 II. Aimed at sports shooters it promises improved AF, including advanced subject recognition, along with the highest-ever rated image stabilization system.
One of three lenses launched alongside the Nikon Z6 and Z7, on the face of it the Z 50mm F1.8 S might appear the most pedestrian of the group, but it might just be the niftiest fifty we've ever seen.
Following testing of the Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II, we've added it to our Pocketable Enthusiast Compact Cameras buying guide as joint-winner, alongside Sony's Cyber-shot RX100 VA.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
A question frequently asked on the Internet is 'what's the best DSLR?' In this buying guide we've answered that question – but also whether it's the right question to be asking in the first place.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
The 12th International Garden Photographer of the Year winners have been announced. We've gathered the top photos from each category and rounded them up into a slideshow.
Uber software engineer Phillip Wang has created a website that shows a portrait of a person that doesn't actually exist by using AI to merge multiple faces together.
Want to know more about the Canon EOS RP? Dying to ask a question that hasn't been addressed anywhere else online? Join the editors of DPReview for a live Q&A about this new camera next Tuesday, Feb. 19 on our YouTube channel. Click through for details.
Got a couple of minutes? Then you have all the time you need to learn about Canon's second full-frame mirrorless camera body – and why it's a compelling option for someone stepping into full-frame for the first time.
A quick glance at the spec sheet doesn't make the Canon EOS RP look that exciting. But having shot with it, we've become oddly fond of this little full framer.
Pixelmator Pro has received an update with new and improved features, including support for Portrait Masks with images captured by the iPhone's Portrait Mode.
Alongside the EOS RP, Canon showed us mockups of the six lenses it says are in development for 2019. There's a distinct high-end flavor to the options in the works.
The new X-T30 may not be Fujifilm's flagship model, but it arrives with some very impressive features and specifications. Chris and Jordan have been shooting it for a few days and share their first impressions, along with a look at an iconic new building in their hometown of Calgary.
We don't often get excited about $900 cameras, but the Fujifilm X-T30 has really impressed us thus far. Find out what's new, what it's like to use and how it compares to its peers in our review in progress.
The Fujifilm X-T30 is equipped with the same 26.1MP X-Trans sensor and X-Processor 4 Quad Core CPU as the X-T3, along with some autofocus improvements. The new camera arrives in March for $900 body-only.
Fujifilm's XF 16mm F2.8 is one of the widest lenses in the company's lineup of compact primes for its X-series interchangeable lens cameras. We've been up and down the streets of snowy Seattle - a rare sight - to see just what our pre-production copy of this petite prime is capable of.
Canon has unveiled its second full-frame mirrorless camera: the entry-level EOS RP. Touting its compact size and approachability for beginners, the RP uses a 26.2MP sensor and will sell for $1300 body-only this March.
A pre-launch event gave us a chance to shoot a sample gallery to show what sort of image quality you can expect from the least-expensive digital full frame camera ever launched.
Nikon has taken the wraps off a new standard zoom lens for mirrorless, the Z 24-70mm F2.8 Z. The new 24-70mm has been on Nikon's Z-series roadmap since the mount was announced last August, and it will ship in spring for $2299.
Canon has announced the development of six RF lenses, including the incredibly compact RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM, two variations of an RF 85mm F1.2L USM, plus a 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM, 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM.
Nikon has announced more details of firmware in development for the Z6 and Z7. As previously reported, firmware is being planned that will add Eye-detection AF, CFexpress support and Raw video over HDMI.
Tripod manufacturer Three Legged Thing has developed a new L-bracket designed to fit a wider range of cameras and allow users to mount their camera in a variety of ways.
Comments