A Tokyo-based startup has successfully crowdfunded a wearable camera concept called Blincam. Much the way Google Glass works, Blincam would attach to a pair of glasses and snap photos when the wearer winks or blinks. According to the team behind the product, the final product will be compatible with a mobile app that immediately provides access to photos taken with the camera.
Blincam is said to feature a patent-pending Eye Movement Sensor that detects when the wearer blinks, as well as an integrated speaker for playing a shutter sound, an LED battery indicator light, Bluetooth connectivity, microUSB, 32GB of internal storage and an 'HD CMOS' camera sensor.
Blincam Co Ltd, the company behind the campaign, claims to have already developed an alpha version of Blincam, and that it has worked out most of the technical issues. The crowdfunding campaign is intended to raise part of the funds needed to launch the camera. The company anticipates starting deliveries to backers this coming December; as with other crowdfunding projects, however, it is possible the device will never come to fruition.
I think it may be down to the duration of the blink/wink which decides whether or not to capture a frame. A blink is very quick to compared to a wink. I'd like to wear two and do stereo photography. And, how many time do you see something and wish you had your camera ready ? Finally, don't wear this in France or other countries where an individuals right to privacy extends into general public spaces.
In the youtube video promoting this product, I think they should have reversed the gender roles. Because really, the target market for this thing is creepy men.
No need to really worry about privacy until everything is hidden in the frame of the glasses (definitely possible) - just look at Oakley Thump MP3 sunglasses, especially with the earbuds removed.
The title says when you wink, the description says when you blink. There is a big difference between a wink and a blink. People blink all the time, some far more than others, so if it triggers on a blink there will be a lot of useless pictures.
If you don't already wear glasses how many people want to buy and wear a pair. I'm guessing most would rather carry a small camera or use their cell phone.
Edit: I just watched the video, it looks like it's a wink even though it's called Blincam. I think they might be better off selling a new and improved exercise machine or the most durable sharpest kitchen knives in the world.
About half of all American women and over 40% of men wear glasses. In Japan, the figure is even higher. This does not include people who wear sunglasses or fashion glasses with no corrective optics. That's a large enough niche to start with.
Just by looking at people in malls and public places I do not believe your statistics are correct. Even if you were correct that still leaves "about half" of women and 60% of men who do not and you are assuming that of those that do all will want to wear glasses with a bulky camera attached to them. At best it would be a much much smaller percentage. How many people who wear fashion glasses want a camera attached to them, unless that's a new fashion statement. Sunglasses are not the same as glasses. They much lighter, they are considered "cool" by far more people than glasses with a camera would be and viewing a subject through a dark lens is not an ideal condition.
I see you're really intent on making up reasons to hate on this thing.
1) I'm glad your local shopping mall preferentially attracts people with excellent vision. So what? Anecdotal evidence does not prove anything. Meanwhile, a majority of my colleagues at work wear glasses. 2) Why are you trying to insinuate that a) this product is useless unless it is accessible to 100% of the population; and b) the existence of this product means anyone with glasses has to shoot with this? I fail to follow your rambling logic. 3) Your attempted swipe at sunglasses is really grasping at straws. Who cares about the "dark lens"? The camera's not shooting through the sunglasses, and the wearer "view the subject" only to roughly frame it--with something like this, it's clearly impossible to frame and focus exactly.
I said shopping malls and public places, including work, and they have nothing to do with attracting people with perfect vision. What a silly statement, shopping malls are the opposite of being preferential to a certain type of status. I didn't say it was useless but I AM insinuating that it is a product that will do poorly in the market, as are most of the other comments which you are apparently ignoring.
The only one rambling is you trying defend them with your poor statistics and contradicting statements. "Anecdotal evidence does not prove anything" and yet you follow that with the same. LOL
I think most people can easily understand my point that if you are already invested in glasses AND you are interested in this product you might be willing to try it whereas if you do not already own glasses you would be much less likely to try the product. I hope that is easier for you to follow.
I'm not swiping at sunglasses you brought them up and my points about them are valid. People care about the "dark lens" otherwise why not wear sunglasses when taking pictures with a camera. Most people actually take them off to take a picture. It's just common sense that when you are taking pictures of something you want the clearest view possible. You are the one who is grasping at straws when you brought up sunglasses and fashion glasses to try and strengthen your argument.
There you go again heading off in another direction. What part of " I do not believe your statistics are correct." didn't you understand? You didn't provide any verifiable statistics so how is that any different than zero statistics? I could have just as well made up some statistic.
I didn't feel like getting of topic earlier but I do not believe you even know what anecdote and anecdotal means. Why don't you point out what part of my above statements are anecdotal.
"So I bring up a counter-anecdote, and I get criticized?" I was showing you how ridiculous your logic is but you didn't get that either.
They got the idea from the movie "Hall Pass", when one of the main characters blink so he can create memory pictures of the waitress in front of him lol.
I think this is actually a funny product. I would assume that the idea behind it is to be discreet. However it looks like it would stand out like a sore thumb, and it makes a shutter sound? Why? I also wonder...does it take a picture every time you blink? Funny
I wonder if the World's average IQ went up by 2 or 3 points, would at least half of these creepy, bizarre and Homer Simpson - Austin Power crossover gimmicks go away?
I'm not a grumpy old man. I'm just 35, but there's a time when enough is enough with these dumb ideas.
I assume they are detecting the potential (voltage / electric field) that is generated by the movement of the eye (blinking), which is in the micro to milli-volt range. If that is the case (the only explanation I have), then I also assume that blinking BOTH eyes should activate the shutter. That way you don't get in trouble if you look at a woman accompanied by her jealous man and blink at her :-) ... Blinking /closing both eyes should be safer!!!
The reliability of this method of detection (since it is not elaborate equipment) might be hit and miss due to the inconsistency of this electric charge generation (its magnitude). The potential varies by day, and by other factors. Will there be an automatic re-calibration built-in? The good thing is that the potential is always generated by eye movement, even in total darkness. Good for low-light conditions here.
I wonder... Is that really more creepy than all the selfie-with-strange-sticks people spending time to shoot themselves or even the thounsands of CCTV cameras hanging around "for your safety"... At least, I see some real useful applications for this one.
Nothing creepy about selfie sticks, you just don't need to bring another person to take photos for you, the results are the same. And I think that's for the better. This however, IS CREEPY, because someone may be constantly taking pictures 1)without your knowledge, or 2)constantly winking at you like a gdamn psychopath.
Very soon this gadget will be built into glasses. Wonder what happens if a person is wearing sun glasses..will it still detect the wink. I can see Facebook full of pictures taken by this camera. Should be quite funny.
It would be interesting if you put a telephoto lens on it and put a frame guide on the lens of your glasses. Human head actually has some inherent image stabilization built into it (although not as good as the chicken https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRKu785g0O0)
The eye has an electric charge (cornea is the positive end of the dipole). When you blink eye briefly rolls up and back (it's called Bell's phenomenon). All you need is a circuit to detect this electric dipole. Natural blinks have a shorter time course than winks that generate a larger signal over a longer duration.
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its 24MP resolution is more than enough for most people, and the money saved can buy a lot of glass. Find out what's new and notable about the Z6 in our First Impressions Review.
Many cameras today include built-in image stabilization systems, but when it comes to video that's still no substitute for a proper camera stabilization rig. The Ronin-S aims to solve that problem for DSLR and mirrorless camera users, and we think DJI has delivered on that promise.
The SiOnyx Aurora is a compact camera designed to shoot stills and video in color under low light conditions, so we put it to the test under the northern lights and against a Nikon D5. It may not be a replacement for a DSLR, but it can complement one well for some uses.
At its core, the Scanza is an easy-to-use multi-format film scanner. It offers a quick and easy way to scan your film negatives and slides into JPEGs, but costs a lot more than similar products without a Kodak label.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
A question frequently asked on the Internet is 'what's the best DSLR?' In this buying guide we've answered that question – but also whether it's the right question to be asking in the first place.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Weeks after he was first reported missing, Chinese authorities have confirmed photographer Lu Guang has been arrested near China's far western region Xinjiang.
For the past few weeks, our readers have been voting on their favorite photographic gear released in the past year in a wide range of categories. Now that the first round of voting is over, it's time to pick the best overall product of 2018.
Thanks to camera drones, it's easier than ever to capture stunning photos from an aerial perspective. We present the 10 drone images that inspired us most this year.
Fujifilm has made firmware version 2.0 available on its website for its X-T3 and X-H1 mirrorless cameras, as well as an incremental update for its 80mm F2.8 macro lens.
Sony had the full-frame mirrorless market to itself for nearly five years, but it's no longer alone – the Nikon Z6 and Canon EOS R have both arrived priced to compete with the a7 III. We take a head to head to head look at these three cameras.
As if it needed one, the triple-camera smartphone might really be the final nail in the compact camera's coffin. DPR contributor Lars Rehm brought the LG V40 on a hiking trip recently and found it to be a huge leap forward in terms of creative freedom.
Renowned UK-based landscape photographer Nigel Danson has been using DSLRs for years. In this video, created exclusively for DPReview, Nigel discusses his experience using the Nikon Z7 and why he's excited about mirrorless cameras. (Spoiler... beautiful scenery ahead.)
Tune in this week to see Chris and Jordan's review of the Nikon Z6 full frame mirrorless camera, and also find out what Chris thinks of the popular 35mm focal length. (Rant alert!)
There are plenty of ways to spend well over $250 on photography gear, but we've picked out some standout accessories that are sure to wow the photographer on your shopping list.
Facebook has disclosed a major photo API bug that left the private images of millions of users exposed to third-party apps from September 13, 2018 to September 25, 2018.
Chinese optical manufacturer Kipon has added the Nikon Z and Canon R mounts to its range of adapters made to attach medium format lenses from Hasselblad, Mamiya, Pentax and others to full frame cameras.
Palette Gear has announced an update to its modular, physical editing interface that lets MacOS users now use their palette with Capture One 11 and 12.
Shopping for a photographer? We've got some gift ideas for all budget sizes, but here you'll find our budget-friendliest suggestions – just right for stockings.
It's not always easy to find marble, wood or concrete surfaces on demand. Enter Replica Surfaces, small tiles designed to replicate popular photo surfaces and backdrops.
Lensrentals Founder Roger Cicala set aside some time to take apart Canon's new 50mm F1.2L RF lens and in doing so revealed a number of interesting discoveries.
With a nickname like 'bokeh master,' we had to see what the Sigma 105mm F1.4 was all about. Take a look at our gallery of samples shot with the Sony a7R III.
Comments