A new pocket-sized consumer camera drone has launched on the crowdfunding website Kickstarter, where the team behind it seeks $125k in funding. Called Selfly, this drone is dubbed a ‘smart flying phone case camera' due to its unique storage design. When not in use, Selfly folds into a compact rectangular shape that can be attached to the back of an included smartphone case.
Selfly is a small autonomous camera drone that, when stored, folds into a 9mm phone case. When removed from the case, four rotors appear to automatically lift the drone into the air where it hovers by default. The related mobile app offers optional control modes, including ‘Stick Control,’ ‘Voice Control,’ and ‘Fly By Picture.’
The integrated camera features an 8MP sensor able to record video at 1080p/30fps; live video broadcasting is supported, though flight time tops out at only five minutes. The drone is compatible with all 4" to 6" smartphones via its Universal Flip Cover Case. Additionally, Selfly has dedicated phone cases for the iPhone 6/6 Plus/7/7 Plus, Galaxy S6/7 edge, Galaxy 7, and the Nexus 6.
Selfly is similar to the pocket-sized AirSelfie drone that launched on Kickstarter late last year. That drone’s campaign has ended after exceeding its funding goal; backers pledged more than €570,000.
570,000 euros backing for something that will never see the light of day. Are people really so dumb? This product isn't feasible in so many ways...let alone from a startup.
Has anybody seen a working prototype? They must have one, they are showing it in the video! I presume DPR have, seeings that they consider it serious enough to make the news on a slow Sunday [sarcasm]
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT WILL SHORTLY be offering shares in the Brooklyn bridge,those wishing to own a one tenthousand share of ownership at 499.00 can look up this unique offering on kickstarter,but act now,because after the kickstarter goals are reached,the price will go up to 749.00... thats a 50% saving for those who act early... dont be left out even if you dont wish to opt for the full package , other levels of support are still available if you nact now! one dollar - will get your name on our website as iconic bridge-lover extraordinaire with a printable certificate showing your support as well as membership in the pt barnum citizens committee of useful people ... a rare chance to show you care 20- dollars gets the cd 49.99 gets the deluxe dvd 99.99 gets the blue ray
this will sell out soon[we must get more than 34million usd in preorders otherwise you may lose everything and we will go belly up]dont let this happen order often the more you play the more you wn
You'd have to be really stupid to invest in this. Crowd source simple engineering products, sure. But people don't realize how difficult it is to design stuff like this. They don't even know if it's feasible or just a dream. Stay away. Power, motors, control, cameras.
is it just me that finds the current obsession with selfies (visit the far east to see it at its most absurd level), to be incredibly narcissistic and arrogant. These people with their phones on the end of sticks, in between hitting other folks on the head with them, seem to want to insert themselves in front of any scene they are taking.
Not really. It's just a version of the same photo that has been taken by travelers since the beginning of photography where you don't have to (a) give you camera to someone else or (b) set your camera down, start the timer, and then sprint to be in the photo.
The selfie isn't new, it's just a new technique for taking the same picture.
Remember the last drone failure? All body, propellers too tiny to make it fly? This is an other one. The only way that thing would fly is to use tiny, synchro high-performance motors capable of ten thousand or more RPM and those things cost about $400/ea and are not light-weight.
It is true that smaller propellers, like the wings of a bee, have to turn disproportionate faster to generate proportional lift. I don't believe this thing exists as depicted in the video, I think it's CGI. Modern day snake oil.
It can fly... the are RC helicopters or quad-copters at very low prices, add a camera with some stabilization included in the module (that's what it looks it is) and a wi-fi module and there you go.... but software development costs too, so in order to work nice... well... i have my doubts, or maybe they'll just keep it simple and manual. Also at that size it will be mostly usable inside (or outside if totally zero winds) .. and a fly time of some 5 minutes, so you will carry it with you just to use is 2-3 times :)
Why are so many drones based on the battery inefficient multicopter-design, when an airplane-based design would offer so much smoother glide, less noise and longer battery time?
I am a camera drone operator for weddings and I can tell you that winged drones do have their advantages but requires a minimum speed to stay airborne. Quads can stay stationary and allows more flexible camera pans. Winged drones have both their advantages and disadvantages but quad drones still offer more.
Stationary is boring in my opinion. I would easily trade stationarity for flight time. Is there really so few people that prioritize like me or is it just the low availability of winged drones that forces people to choose multicopters in stead?
As a viewer, what do you think feels most natural: A view like a surveillance camera from the top of a flag pole, or like being a bird, moving your head to look around as you fly?
Why does Mavic and other drones have an orbit function if stationary view looks so good?
Do you understand what I mean by stationary boring now?
Have you seen the guitar solo scene in Guns n roses - November rain? Or Pink floyd - Learning to fly? How would those videos look with a stationary surveillance cam view?
But you realize that last option (stationary) is a large compromise to flight time?
That compromise is like comparing a set of good primes and 2x-3x zooms to a single 15x superzoom and concluding that the superzoom is the best lens because its a all-in-one. Jack of all trades - master of none.
Sure it might be best for some, but I just wonder why almost all drones play the versatility card.. To mee, multicopters are far overrated and winged drones far underappreciated.
Do you run around in circles when taking a video? Study a building by running around it? Suppose I put a spell on you and you could never stop running. Ever.
Ok , but what aircraft can simulate a camera boom, dolly, slider, and tripod all in one system... A multicopter ... When was the last time a wedding client, realestate agent, construction site inspecter asked to see footage of feeling like there flying like a bird... The airplane style drones do serve a great purpose for cinema, long range flights like crop dusting, information gathering and bombing...
I could see moderate but true success if they just marketed this as a Quadcopter that is portable and attaches to a smartphone case so that you can fly it whenever you want to. The product is basically that. It will never take good photos or videos.
If it can produce similer iq to a high end smartphone it will be valuable to the selfie market ... The Camera Store YouTube channel had a jpeg shoot out with cameras in the $800-$2000 range and also threw in an iPhone and printed out the images .. the iPhone won in the landscape photo.. don't underestimate a small sensor in good light... Now indoors in bad lighting that's another story...
The problem is not putting in a decent sensor, the problem is the lack of a stabilizing gimbal. Still images might be OK, but video will be poor quality regardless of the lens and sensor.
Yes. The problem is no gimbal. This will have the same issues as the Onagofly has. I own one. It is comparable in size to the one pictured here, but it doesn't fold up. It does take video and stills, but without a gimbal, there is motion resulting from corrections to compensate for air turbulence plus corrections due to noise in the various navigation sensors.
At least the price isn't too bad, but drones in this price range are crappy for any kind of quality work. I doubt it's stable enough for use in anything but in a bright sunny day.
I can just imagine someone launching one of these things in a club, and a software glitch occurs. The next morning police find 800 bodies with their heads sliced open.
Yes, I think so; all these excessively chirpy happy, so happy, people passing their time playing with these 'toys'. Must be the week-end when 4 generations of the (same) family always get together for a picnic, or frisbee throwing or some other style of 1970ies entertainment and even Gran'ma knows how to operate the drone controls.
Who wanna bet it's going to end just like all those other "revolutionary" ambitious small camera drone kickstarters? That is, in failure and misuse of funding?
Designing a drone is not easy. Designing a camera drone is even harder. Designing a compact inexpensive camera drone that also has good software is a true engineering challenge. Even big and experienced companies mostly fail at that. Yet it seems random "designers" seem to think they can easily pull this off just because they can draw a nice drone in modelling software.
A rule of thumb here is very simple: unless there is a working prototype, don't support it. And even with the prototype, use some common sense.
PS: Also, gotta love that super stable broadcast-grade footage they show in their promos. Because, you know, that's totally achievable with current camera technology and gimbal-less video from a tiny sensor on a lightweight drone would totally NOT look like crappy jello-fest full of noise and compression artifacts.
Yup. Calling bull on this one as well. Amazing quality footage from an unstabilized camera on a drone? I also love the cute "helicopter" noises they added, rather than the really loud buzzing/whine of a small drone.
I know there were several cases of bad projects recently, but still this is Kickstarter - and there are also a ton of great ones.
1. If you read the project you will see its not claiming to be "revolutionary tech" - its made ONLY from existing components with existing tech, and their innovation is limited to packaging it in a smart phone case with a simple to use selfie app.
Sounds about right. After the Onagofly debacle, and the Lilly failure, can something like this be at all legit? Trusting what you see is foolish, the Crowdfunding Promotion business has been growing since crowdfunding started, many of the key players like Kickstarter are connected to the promotion side of the business, it's too much money not to be. This campaign's presentation is slick, and slick is not cheap.
I still like to look at these "projects" from a skeptical marketing view, see how unrealistic they look. This project though, when you look at their timeline, started about 20 months ago. If you trust what they show, they have built two stages of prototypes. I still don't believe any video came out of the actuals, but I think they have built the basic unit. What's odd is at this point they're seeking $125K, and have already reached about $105K with 40 days to go, they will easily reach their goal....but $125K? Where does that get anything going? Tooling, production, testing, paying themselves for the last 20 months...that figure makes no sense. Lily raised tens of millions, and still could not achieve production.
At best, it's a party toy. At that end, it could be a pretty fun party toy. At about $90, it's a cheap party toy. You're right, the video and stills will probably suck. But it could be a fun toy.
@David222, it being a $99 drone is exactly why it's not possible. Especially for a young company with no well-established large-scale production partners. 400 bucks? Ehh, maybe, if they had experienced engineers and a proper business plan (which is unlikely in its own right). For $99 bucks you can barely build a proper toy drone with no smart features. Yet they see no problem in showing amazing quality video footage and promising lots of cool stuff.
People seem to fall for these projects with sky-high promises at lowest possible (actually not possible) prices again and again, even after being shown multiple times that miracles don't happen.
I just watched the video again and that drone sure looks like a good CG job. I do NOT think that was a real prototype. As an IT guy with an electronics and development background, I wouldn't give them a dime .... other than maybe to make a nice video for me 🤔‼️
Yes, the drone is real and flying and not a CG job, however it is moving like a drunken bee. Resulting in blurry pictures (probably also caused by a crappy camera). Forget about video. The shown footage in the "promotional video" is most definately not taken by the drone. The idea is nice but it is a gadget.
In short: It wont handle ANY wind. it has to be 100% free of wind. It wont be very stable either. I have never supporteded a crowdfunding project & so happy I never have & never will. Its the new scam.
I actually have supported 4-5 crowdfunding projects and have been very happy with all of them, but you have to really know what you are supporting and know who is providing it.
Change the word "is" to "will be after we get some money and develop this thing from scratch magically because we just thought it up over a beer and have no freaking idea if we can build it or not, and we'd rather start a kick starter campaign than find real jobs".
Bottom line on all these crowdsourced projects, do NOT believe videos. Unless you see the prototype in action at a trade show or otherwise, please don't send money.
Sony has just released a trio of impressively small, light, ultrawide lenses for APS-C. These lenses are designed for vloggers, so Chris decided to film himself and find out how they perform.
The Fujifilm X-H2S is the company's latest APS-C flagship, using a 26MP Stacked CMOS sensor to deliver the fastest shooting, best autofocus and most extensive video specs of any X-series camera yet. Here's what's new and what we think so far...
How do you make weird lens even weirder? Put a periscope on it! We check out the new Laowa Periprobe 24mm F14 2X and explore some of the creative things you can do with such a bizarre lens.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
In our continuing series about each camera manufacturer's strengths and weakness, we turn our judgemental gaze to Leica. Cherished and derided in equal measure, what does Leica get right, and where can it improve?
A dental office, based in Germany, had a team of pilots create a mesmerizing FPV drone video to give prospective clients a behind-the-scenes look at the inner workings of their office.
Samsung has announced the ISOCELL HP3, a 200MP sensor with smaller pixels than Samsung's original HP1 sensor, resulting in an approximately 20 percent reduction in the size of the smartphone camera module.
Street photography enthusiast Rajat Srivastava was looking for a 75mm prime lens for his Leica M3. He found a rare SOM Berthiot cinema lens that had been converted from C mount to M mount, and after a day out shooting, Srivastava was hooked.
The lens comes in at an incredibly reasonable price point, complete with a stepping motor autofocus system and an onboard Micro USB port for updating firmware.
The new version of the Blackmagic Design Pocket Cinema Camera 6K brings it much closer to the 6K Pro model, with the same battery, EVF but a new rear screen. New firmware for the whole PPC series brings enhanced image stabilization for Resolve users
The OM System 12-40mm F2.8 PRO II is an updated version of one of our favorite Olympus zoom lenses. Check out this ensemble gallery from our team, stretching from Washington's North Cascades National Park to rural England, to see how it performs.
The first preset, called 'Katen' or 'Summer Sky,' is designed to accentuate the summer weather for Pentax K-1, K-1 Mark II and K-3 Mark III DSLR cameras with the HD Pentax-D FA 21mm F2.4 ED Limited DC WR and HD Pentax-DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited lenses attached.
As we continue to update our Buying Guides with the cameras we've recently reviewed, we've selected the Sony a7 IV as our pick for the best video camera for photographers. It's not the best video camera we've tested but it offers the strongest balance of video and stills capabilities.
For the next several weeks, many observers will be able to see Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn in the predawn sky with the naked eye. Of course, a camera with a telephoto lens or telescope attached will get you an even closer look.
The June 2022 Premiere Pro update adds a collection of new and improved features and performance upgrades, including a new Vertical Video workspace, improved H.264/HEVC encoding on Apple silicon and more.
Researchers at NVIDIA have created a new inverse rendering pipeline, 3D MoMa. It turns a series of images of a 2D object into a 3D object built upon a triangular mesh, allowing it to be used with a wide range of modeling tools and engines.
Light Lens Lab is a rather obscure optics company, but their manual lenses for Leica M-mount camera systems tend to offer a unique aesthetic at what usually ends up being reasonable price points.
We've updated our 'around $2000' buying guide, to include cameras such as the Sony a7 IV and OM System OM-1. We've concluded that the Sony does enough to edge-out our previous pick, the Canon EOS R6.
This compact shotgun microphone will convert the analog audio signal to digital internally before sending it as a digital signal to compatible MI Shoe cameras, such as the ZV-E10 and a7C.
In addition to the Amber and Blue versions, which give flares and highlights warm and cool tones, respectively, the new Silver Nanomorph option offers a more neutral flare that changes with the color temperature of the lights being used.
The organizers of the Bird Photographer of the Year competition have revealed the top finalists, showcasing the incredible photography of avian photographers from around the globe.
Both the 27" and 32" models use a 3,840 x 2,160 pixel IPS LCD panel that offers 98% DCI-P3 coverage and Pantone validation for accurate color representation.
A very special Leica camera just became the most expensive ever sold. Chris and Jordan were in Germany for the auction, and to tell you why this particular camera is so special.
As part of any mission to Mars, there will be garbage and discarded components. The Perseverance rover recently spotted a piece of trash, a bit of shiny thermal blanket. It's believed to be from Perseverance's landing operation, but it's not clear how it ended up where it did on the red planet.
Fujifilm has announced the Instax Mini Link 2 smartphone printer. The compact printer features new customizable frames, image modes and a feature called INSTAXAiR that lets you 'draw' designs onto your prints.
DxO has announced Nik Collection 5. The suite of eight plug-ins includes redesigned Color Efex and Analog Efex plug-ins, plus Viveza and Silver Efex, which were rebuilt last year.
Comments