Last month, NASA announced that Curiosity rover had wrapped up its work at Mars' Vera Rubin Ridge and would be making its way to a clay-rich region near the Red Planet's Mt. Sharp for additional work. In an update on that mission last week, the space agency shared a panoramic image captured by Curiosity's MastCam at the ridge drill site before it left, as well as an interactive video of the area.
Curiosity's last drill site on the ridge is known as 'Rock Hall,' and it's located relatively close to the 'clay-bearing unit' that researchers will study next. A panorama from the Rock Hall location was created using images captured by the rover before it departed the site. NASA also published a 360-degree video from the images and annotated a few landmarks in it, including Mt. Sharp in the distance.
Visible near Mt. Sharp is the clay-rich region, now called 'Glen Torridon,' where Curiosity will help researchers uncover more details about Mars' landscape and history. The rover is equipped with multiple cameras, including the MastCam and the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI), which is attached to its robotic arm.
Last month, NASA shared a stitched image of the full Curiosity rover at the Rock Hall drill site; that image is made from 57 individual images that were captured using the MAHLI camera. The 'selfie' features the final Rock Hall drill site in the bottom center of the image.
Overexposed sky and they didn't level the camera properly for panorama rotation. Image processing probably used some kind of generic setting because of unnatural contast and/or black level. This is typical when shooting with default in-camera JPEG profiles.
I can't believe what kind of monkey process those images. There is big money right there, but it looks like some random person did first panorama with auto settings. Also dislike that panorama projection because it looks sooo unnatural. There is no clear visible "corners" when moving your eyes or rotating your head.
You really need to go to NASA and set them straight as to how stupid they are. I'm quite certain that you could do far better. Exactly when does your ship land ?
No doubt someone will present a proof that the picture was taken on Devon Island, or somewhere in the Mojave desert. Can't wait to see the proof. ... Where are the conspiracy theorists?? .. :)
yes yes, the moon landings is a government conspiracy, humans have never been outside of the earth atmosphere and most importantly the earth is flat satisfied?
That is the question now isn't it. Its difficult to say with the paucity of independently verifiable/trustworthy information. I'll just have to say I don't know. Can you say that??
You believe whatever you want. Most people in general wouldn't know the truth if it slapped them in the face. Conspiracy is part and parcel of the human condition when money and power are involved. Is this news to you?
I work for Northrop Grumman; a lot of my focus at work directed towards space and satelitle technology ... I think I have enough evidence to know the truth.
Chadders, you seem to be referring to me as a conspiracy theorist after I’ve already explained my initial comment was made in jest, smiley and all. Please get your nose out of the engineering books and look up sarcasm. Do you see me here promoting a moon landing hoax? No, I’m arguing against your mistaken assumption that a subscribe to that conspiracy theory. Laughable, really...
Donco ... I guess I’m too mature to understand your level of sarcasm; and too busy to post silly throwaway comments rather than make the effort to say something constructive. My last comment was also aimed at someone else ... that’s the laughable thing really.
You say that your comment about conspiracy theorists wasn't aimed at me, which means you need to learn to communicate better. Why? Because the first part of your comment clearly referred to me (re 'comic' Dane Cook, whom I mentioned previously), and you did not indicate that your second point was directed to someone else. You say you are too mature to understand sarcasm, but please don't confuse maturity with dementia... Cheers.
I worked for Northrop Grumman too, on satellite projects, etc, etc. That in itself is evidence of nothing. But believing that human beings won't conspire is the most demented, stupid thing I've ever heard. Yet I'm the crazy one... cheers.
I could give you plenty evidence we went to the moon; but you’re probably so blinkered, you’d choose to believe 12 year old Petes UTube conspiracy instead!
Typical nonsensical comment. I can show you a video with astronauts faking a shot of the earth through a window. I can provide evidence that Neil Armstrong was handing out petrified wood as "moon" rocks. These are documented and more critically, independently verifiable, facts. There are many other examples if you care to go into it, but I know you don't, so don't bother. You're the 12yo, refusing to question your indoctrination.
I’d love to see this BS evidence you have. Do you realise how utterly pathetic your comments make you sound to normal thinking people (and those of us that have experience of working in the space sector). Sighs.
Just go to the Nevada Desert. That's where these images come from. Area 54 or The Death Valley. Don't have to go to Mars. After a week there you'll feel miserable: No beer!!
@MannyZero so true, i remember seeing someone who found the exact location of the first rover selfie in the Nevada desert and did a rock for rock comparison and it had a nice little NASA bus in the background lol. Ever since i saw that photo I can't believe anything NASA says anymore, too bad.
I love it when idiots talk about the NASA training area in the desert.
The guy who originally "discovered" it found it on google earth. It wasn't satellite imagery, it was special "street view" type images added by NASA THEMSELVES.
So NASA voluntarily add panoramic images of their training ground to google earth, one idiot pretends like he's found some massive secret even though he knows fully well the images were added purposefully and then a million conspiracy theorists with severe Dunning Kruger syndrome parrot it around the internet.
And then they link to other conspiracy theorist websites where they essentially see faces in clouds but with mars photos instead and then draw over the photos in photoshop to emphasise the faces in the clouds.
A mixture of imagination and pseudo science all designed to make dumb people feel like they are really intelligent so that they will buy books etc. Ever notice how these conspiracy sites always have a large webshop? ;-)
@Roland : Just photograph the moon with an f/0.95 lens wide open. Proof of the spherical (not pancake) nature of the moon will show toward the edges of the disk where the moonscape will go out of focus.
Those f/0.95 lenses have razor thin DOF, even at 239,000 miles. That's why they cost so much. 😁
But get this: All those people you think you impressed with your secret knowledge actually just thought you were insane so they agreed politely out of fear.
what makes you think you are right and I am wrong? I have seen photos of nevada desert which are identical minus the Photoshop colour balance, rock for rock. If that isn't enough evidence to say that NASA lied when they claim it was taken from Mars then you must be the one classed as insane. Conformists are always quick to insult the more open minded questioning type.
My understanding is that because Mars doesn't have the same core as the Earth which produces the magnetic belts which protect our atmosphere from the ravages of the Sun trying to 'terraform' Mars would be a pointless exercise.
There are two problems with not having a magnetic field. 1. There are no protection against cosmic radiation and the solar wind. So, humans might not survive so many years. 2. The lack of protection against the solar wind will blow any atmosphere away, which is what have happened on Mars.
So - the only way to live on Mars is under ground or maybe inside in houses, where you can have an atmosphere and also be protected against radiation.
To be able to terraform the entire planet, you first have to generate a magnetic field. Then you can start making an atmosphere and extracting water.
NOTE also - that if you do extract water and make an atmosphere that it will always be winter when you are ready. The sun is far away.
"I have seen photos of nevada desert which are identical minus the Photoshop colour balance, rock for rock. If that isn't enough evidence to say that NASA lied when they claim it was taken from Mars then you must be the one classed as insane."
The irony of using the word insane is just breathtaking.
Two deserts look the same, if you photoshop the colours of one to match the other. Therefore they ARE the same desert?
Brilliant.
You realise a desert on mars is made of the same ingredients as a desert on earth, right? Other planets aren't made out of jelly and candyfloss.
Just because you fell for these dumbed down pseudo facts doesn't mean they are true. It just means you are easily fooled and seduced by the idea that you are some kind of anti conformist genius.
You lack the insight to realise how meaningless your comparison is.
@James Pilcher: For any reasonable telephoto focal length lens the hyperfocal distance at f/1 is approximately 3000m, which means that everything from about that distance to infinity is "in focus." In other words, the DoF is far more than 100 times larger than the diameter of the moon. If, in an image of the moon, the center of the disk appears in focus and the limb does not, it's likely the effect of lens field curvature, i.e., the surface of sharpest focus of the image is curved and not entirely coincident with the plane of the camera sensor.
Mars does possess some magnetic properties, although it lacks an internal dynamo such as Earth's, which gives us our magnetic field and protection from cosmic rays.
The Mars atmosphere consists almost exclusively of CO2 and the air pressure is around half a percent of the pressure on earth. And oxygen? Almost none!
@James Pilcher: Sorry, I guess the joke is on me! Some people have profound misconceptions or misunderstandings that show through in their posts, so one never knows. This time you got me. 🤙
@schex87 : Try your Voigtlander 25mm f/0.95. That's a longer focal length. The added bonus is that your moon will glow with that Voigtlander f/0.95 CA goodness.
The Leica Q2 is an impressively capable fixed-lens, full-frame camera with a 47MP sensor and a sharp, stabilized 28mm F1.7 Summilux lens. It's styled like a traditional Leica M rangefinder and brings a host of updates to the hugely popular original Leica Q (Typ 116) that was launched in 2015.
The Edelkrone DollyONE is an app-controlled, motorized flat surface camera dolly. The FlexTILT Head 2 is a lightweight head that extends, tilts and pans. They aren't cheap, but when combined these two products provide easy camera mounting, re-positioning and movement either for video work or time lapse photography.
Are you searching for the best image quality in the smallest package? Well, the GR III has a modern 24MP APS-C sensor paired with an incredibly sharp lens and fits into a shirt pocket. But it's not without its caveats, so read our full review to get the low-down on Ricoh's powerful new compact.
The Olympus OM-D E-M1X is the ultimate sports, action and wildlife camera for professional Micro Four Thirds users. However, it can't quite match the level of AF reliability offered by its full frame competitors.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2000? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2000 and recommended the best.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
We've updated our waterproof camera buying guide with the latest round of rugged compacts, and we've crowned a new winner as the best pick in the category: the Olympus TG-6. That is, unless you happen to find a good deal on the TG-5.
According to Sony's latest financial report, it's overtaken Nikon to have the second largest market share in the global digital camera market, based on revenue.
Lenny Kravitz and Leica team up to produce perhaps the most eye-catching M camera ever, in the snakeskin Drifter kit. Limited to just 125 units, you'll need to move fast to get one.
Researchers with the Samsung AI Center in Moscow and the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology have created a system that transforms still images into talking portraits with as little as a single image.
K&R Photographics, a camera store in Crescent Springs, Kentucky, was robbed by armed men, who not only took thousands of dollars worth of camera equipment, but also injured the 70-year-old co-owner of the store.
The new Fujifilm GFX 100 boasts some impressive specifications, including 100MP, in-body stabilization and 4K video. But what's it like to shoot with? Senior Editor Barnaby Britton found out on a recent trip to Florence, Italy.
Apple has updated its MacBook Pro with 8-core processors for the first time ever, as well as an improved keyboard that should resolve the issues of past butterfly keyboards.
Back in early March, we had the opportunity to visit Fujifilm's factory in Sendai, Japan, where assembly line staff were manually assembling the earliest pre-production samples of the GFX 100.
Chris and Jordan are at Fujifilm's GFX 100 launch event in Japan (well, in a nearby hotel room) and have some initial thoughts about using this 100MP medium format powerhouse.
It's here! The long-awaited next-generation Fujifilm GFX has been officially launched. Click through to learn more about the camera that Fujifilm is hoping will shake up the pro photography market - the GFX100.
We recently had the opportunity to shoot in Florence, Italy with a pre-production sample of the Fujifilm GFX 100. Check out our gallery of JPEG samples to get an idea of its capabilities.
We've known about the Fujifilm GFX 100 since last fall, but now it's official: this 102MP medium-format monster will be available at the end of June for $10,000. In addition to its incredible resolution, the camera also has in-body IS, a hybrid AF system, 4K video and a removable EVF.
What must be the world's most camera-friendly airport has set out locations all around its perimeter fence specifically so photographers can get all the best angles unhindered by wires.
According to DJI, any drone model weighing over 250 grams will have AirSense Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) receivers installed to help drone operators know when planes and helicopters are nearby.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (USDHS) sent out an alert on Monday stating drones manufactured in China are a 'potential risk to an organization's information.'
Chris and Jordan are kicking off a new segment in which they make feature suggestions to manufacturers for the benefit of all photographer-kind. To start things off, they take a look at the humble USB-C port and everything it could be doing for us.
The Olympus TG-5 is one of our favorite waterproof cameras, and the company today introduced the TG-6, a relatively low-key update. New features include the addition of an anti-reflective coating on the sensor, a higher-res LCD, and more underwater and macro modes.
We've long held Olympus' Tough cameras in high regard and the TG-6 is no exception. It offers top notch image quality for its class and lots of useful features. It's also a blast to shoot with.
A big design is in the pipeline for the popular Godox shoot-through flash trigger, with a new control layout and a collection of new features - including Bluetooth connectivity
The Leica Q2 is an impressively capable fixed-lens, full-frame camera with a 47MP sensor and a sharp, stabilized 28mm F1.7 Summilux lens. It's styled like a traditional Leica M rangefinder and brings a host of updates to the hugely popular original Leica Q (Typ 116) that was launched in 2015.
We've been playing around with a prototype of the new Peak Design Travel Tripod and are impressed so far: it's incredibly compact, fast to deploy and stable enough for the heaviest bodies. However, the price may turn some away.
The Camera Store has reported that on May 15, 2019 their store was robbed of a Sony lens and camera, and an employee subsequently sprayed with bear spray while attempting to apprehend the suspect.
Comments