Optics manufacturer Samyang has released a new lens simulator web app that allows you to see how certain lenses will affect the look of a scene based on sensor size and lens settings.
The web app creates a simulated scene using a cutout portrait of a woman as well as three backgrounds. By changing the sensor size, focal length, aperture and distance, the scene will adjust to show a simulated representation of what the image would like like when the shutter is pressed.
The web app is somewhat rudimentary, but its simulated representations do a good job of showing photography newcomers how crop factors, focal lengths, apertures and the subject’s distance from the lens can impact the look of an image. Samyang also includes an option to select on of its lenses to use as a preset of sorts to see what a given Samyang (also sold under the Rokinon/Bowen brands) lens will produce.
Both Canon and Nikon have lens simulators of their own, so this isn’t exactly an original idea, but it’s yet another option you can try out.
Simplistic, but not a bad effort. DOFsimulator is way more featured and very good on its own terms, but too complex for some. However, even that has some failings. Would be good to have a middle-distance 'layer' so you can get an idea of blur falloff.
I thought that this nonsense was fully explained eons ago—f/2.8 is always f/2.8.
I can use my Sekonic L758 hand-held-incident meter to take a reading. If it says the f/stop is f/2.8, I can set the stop on any camera, from 1" digital to 8x10 film camera and get the correct exposure.
To get a shallow Depth-of-Field, shoot at the minimum focus distance wide open. You will find that even a 14mm lens has a shallow DOF Posted on a DPR forum *"Samyang 14mm has surprisingly good bokeh"* https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/50737344
These sorts of tools would be far more useful if the scene was configurable. I think the single subject and infinite background make it a bit too simplistic. Ideally I'd want to be able to set a background distance (a wall, for example), and put at least a couple of subjects at different distances in front of that wall.
But hey, you get what you pay for, and in this case, I can't really complain!
Oh, I'm not complaining. I have a scene setup in my 3D software where I can quickly calculate DoF for any situation, so it's really not important to me.
Good for visualising bokeh, and demonstrates how increasing focal length is often more effective at blurring backgrounds than splashing out on expensive primes.
Doubling the focal length and moving back to twice the distance is equivalent to dropping the f/number two stops. Eg, 85mm at f/1.4 from 5ft delivers the same background blur as 170mm at f/2.8 from 10ft.
@BaldCol ... That's funny. When I put a 12mm lens on my 5DsR I get a rectangular full frame image instead of a square one like that shown in dofsimulator.net. Do you suppose there's something wrong with my lens or camera???
That is exactly the reason why the slider only allows 24mm and entering smaller numbers isn't supported by the slider. The background image isn't large enough for that.
It is possible to manually enter smaller numbers for "expert" users who know what they are doing. The author of the site must have been aware that smaller numbers can be entered manually, because there is an additional check that kicks in when the manually entered number is smaller than 12mm.
"@BaldCol ... That's funny. When I put a 12mm lens on my 5DsR I get a rectangular full frame image instead of a square one like that shown in dofsimulator.net. Do you suppose there's something wrong with my lens or camera???"
If you don't want to use the website how about you just don't use it rather than bitching about its apparent defects and making snide remarks. I had never used it until I saw it mentioned by arjunmehta above. It seems a useful teaching aid to me and I will continue to use it. When you have deisgned a similar tool that goes down to smaller focal lengths in the way you want please share the website and I'll use that as well.
@BaldCol ... Hey, look, my initial post was to point out in response to someone claiming dofsimulator.net was superior that it had some limitations that the Samyang tool doesn't. My additional posts were in response to those saying I was mistaken.
I think this DOF simulator is even older, it allows for even three planes, i.e. a person in focus, another person at the different distance, and a background. For each of the three, a different distance can be set. http://kingfisher.in.coocan.jp/boke2/bokekeisan2e.html
@photonius ... Yes, it certainly looks older, but IMO it's superior to either of the two previously discussed apps. Thanks for putting it up on this discussion.
I wonder who can/should take credit for creating it.
@landscaper1. Well, the person who most likely created it seems to be the owner of the kingfisher web site http://kingfisher.in.coocan.jp/English/index.html The site is mostly in Japanese, but it seems to be a person with interest in photography and the kingfisher bird. I hope it stays up, it doesn't look like there is much recent activity.
If you set it at 10mm and slide the distance to 25m, the model flies in to the sky and becomes Mary Poppins! I feel this calculator is not very accurate.
I saw the simulator when looking at the new 35mm and found it to be... jarring. Probably ok for beginners, but others have referenced better tools than this. Ok for a first attempt I guess?
Have to agree with Gannon Burgett, does "a good job of showing photography newcomers how crop factors, focal lengths, apertures and the subject’s distance from the lens can impact the look of an image." It's a nice way for Samyang to get their stable of lenses introduced. Build on this very good beginning, it's worth the effort.
Worst app ever. Not only is the functionality limited, switching between formats doesn't change the DoF either. And that's not to mention the poor subject and background images and overall look.
Switching formats does not change DOF. It changes the recorded angle of view. Otherwise cropping an image in postproduction would change the DOF .. now that would be something cool.
Fixed output size does not mean anything in this case. Whether you crop or not, this is only the enlargement that makes out of focus regions look less sharp... But as soon as you step back, they get sharp again. That's why enlargement is NEVER taken into account when speaking about DOF. If it was, then the DOF scale on a lens would be meaningless...
This at least applies to image-space DOF, which is the “traditional” approach to DOF (including DOF scales). I suspect you might be talking about object space instead?
Agree with what spider-mario has said. In other words: Cropping (switching formats) does not change the image inside crop area in any way. But since DOF is an agreement of allowed "blurriness" of the image, it does change when cropping, whether done by format change or cropping the image afterwards. Lens DOF scales are based on maximum circle of confusion being about 1/1200 of the image width. Depending on what the final image size and viewing distance are, it may be a good or bad assumption. If you use a full frame lens in an m4/3 camera, the DOF scale is not correct. Since the image dimensions are cut to half, the max CoC must be halved too, which means that the scale marks for f/4 now correspond f/8. The same happens if you crop (and enlarge) the image in post.
30 likes for GRUBERND's erroneous comment. It's 2020, you'd think people would have this figured out by now! We're still going to be debating this in 2030, aren't we...
its a pity thier is not an option to keep the framing the same with different focal lengths ..then folk will be surprised that focal length has little bearing on DOF
DOF is only dependant on camera-object distance, f-stop, and projection size (sensor + enlargement). Focal length doesn't change DOF at all, it has been proven over and over again.
If by that you mean changing the distance to the subject proportionally as the focal length is changed (ie doubling or halving both) then yes, I agree - there is no change in the depth of field. At any rate, I wasn’t responding to you.
@biggercountry .. because they used a simplified formula by putting parts of the projection relations into their "focal length" factor.
In casual photography with the usual lenses this works most of the time, but it is not the general optical principle behind it. Especially since what is marketed as "focal length" is in really the "effective focal length", meaning that number is just an approximation of one characteristics of an optical system.
Disclaimer: I'm not an optical engineer, but I did all the math back in photoschool when we had a big fight with a teacher about this topic and we were able to prove him wrong. Science is a b****.
Not accurate. It only changes the background blur, but with shallow DOF the subject may have out of focus areas, too (nose tip vs eyes vs hair). This fact is completely ignored by the simulator.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
Using affordable Sony NP-F batteries and the Power Junkie V2 accessory, you can conveniently power your camera and accessories, whether they're made by Sony or not.
According to Japanese financial publication Nikkei, Sony has moved nearly all of its camera production out of China and into Thailand, citing geopolitical tensions and supply chain diversification.
A pro chimes in with his long-term impressions of DJI's Mavic 3. While there were ups and downs, filmmaker José Fransisco Salgado found that in his use of the drone, firmware updates have made it better with every passing month.
Landscape photography has a very different set of requirements from other types of photography. We pick the best options at three different price ranges.
AI is here to stay, so we must prepare ourselves for its many consequences. We can use AI to make our lives easier, but it's also possible to use AI technology for more nefarious purposes, such as making stealing photos a simple one-click endeavor.
This DIY project uses an Adafruit board and $40 worth of other components to create a light meter and metadata capture device for any film photography camera.
Scientists at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia have used a transmitter with 'less power than a microwave' to produce the highest resolution images of the moon ever captured from Earth.
The tiny cameras, which weigh just 1.4g, fit inside the padding of a driver's helmet, offering viewers at home an eye-level perspective as F1 cars race through the corners of the world's most exciting race tracks. In 2023, all drivers will be required to wear the cameras.
The new ultrafast prime for Nikon Z-mount cameras is a re-worked version of Cosina's existing Voigtländer 50mm F1 Aspherical lens for Leica M-mount cameras.
There are plenty of hybrid cameras on the market, but often a user needs to choose between photo- or video-centric models in terms of features. Jason Hendardy explains why he would want to see shutter angle and 32-bit float audio as added features in cameras that highlight both photo and video functionalities.
SkyFi's new Earth Observation service is now fully operational, allowing users to order custom high-resolution satellite imagery of any location on Earth using a network of more than 80 satellites.
In some parts of the world, winter brings picturesque icy and snowy scenes. However, your drone's performance will be compromised in cold weather. Here are some tips for performing safe flights during the chilliest time of the year.
The winners of the Ocean Art Photo Competition 2022 have been announced, showcasing incredible sea-neries (see what we did there?) from around the globe.
Venus Optics has announced a quartet of new anamorphic cine lenses for Super35 cameras, the Proteus 2x series. The 2x anamorphic lenses promise ease of use, accessibility and high-end performance for enthusiast and professional video applications.
We've shot the new Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2R WR lens against the original 56mm F1.2R, to check whether we should switch the lens we use for our studio test scene or maintain consistency.
Nature photographer Erez Marom continues his series about landscape composition by discussing the multifaceted role played by the sky in a landscape image.
The NONS SL660 is an Instax Square instant camera with an interchangeable lens design. It's made of CNC-milled aluminum alloy, has an SLR-style viewfinder, and retails for a $600. We've gone hands-on to see what it's like to shoot with.
Recently, DJI made Waypoints available for their Mavic 3 series of drones, bringing a formerly high-end feature to the masses. We'll look at what this flight mode is and why you should use it.
Astrophotographer Bray Falls was asked to help verify the discovery of the Andromeda Oxygen arc. He describes his process for verification, the equipment he used and where astronomers should point their telescopes next.
OM Digital Solutions has released firmware updates for the following cameras to add compatibility support for its new M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO lens: OM-D E-M1 Mark II, E-M1 Mark III, E-M5 Mark III, E-M1X, and OM-5.
Micro Four Thirds has 'size benefits, and a shooting experience that can’t be matched by a smartphone,' says the director of Panasonic's camera business, as we talked about the system's future, the role of video, the adoption of phase detection and the role his dog played in the development of the S5 II.
Today's modern cameras are armed with sophisticated autofocusing systems. They can focus anywhere in the frame, track multiple subjects, and switch on the fly. But what good are these advanced tools if you can't see where the camera is even focusing? It's time for the autofocus box to upgrade from its single-color status.
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 II is a powerful mid-range full-frame stills and video mirrorless camera that introduces on-sensor phase detection, 6K 'open gate' video, LUTs for still mode and more. We put the camera through its paces during a hands-on trial run in the real world.
The new FE Sony 20-70mm F4 G has an extremely versatile zoom range, but how do the pictures look? Check out these full resolution 60 megapixel captures!
Comments