Lives in United States United States
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Mar 4, 2003


Total: 37, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Google Pixel tops DxOMark's Mobile rankings (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

burnin: Still f/2.0. Interesting.

I tried to ask Google some questions about the camera and was unable to get any answers, so much for designing the phone. I wanted to know if it had a wide-angle capability or panorama? I also wanted to know if it stitch three or four shots into one image? Pricing is really high but some of the perks that you get a pretty good. I would think they would have to be more competitive with their pricing after the holidays.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 22:12 UTC
On article Under the hood: A closer look at the Sony a7R II (593 comments in total)

Great job testing the A7r2 focusing capabilities!!! can't wait to see your final conclusions and recommendations. I just finished the shoot with a running model that had probably 30 shots with about 24 totally and focus. Best camera I've ever had.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2015 at 00:44 UTC as 73rd comment | 1 reply
On article Getty and Flickr to cease partnership (19 comments in total)

Getty has turned into photography's worst enemy. Now if you're a member of Getty you get $0 for your images, there giving your work away whether you like it or not. Stock is now officially dead for all but a few specializations. Until all photographers decide not to give away their images and charge for them there is no future for the industry.

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 14:39 UTC as 8th comment

I sold all of my Canon gear because of this we know all attitude by Canon. How dare you ask for a better sensor!

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2014 at 21:18 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

Steve Bingham: What an insult! Another penny stock socking it to the photographer - with free advertising from dpreview! No thanks. In fact, this does not speak well for dpreview. 30%? My gallery gives me 50% on my prints and I get 100% when I market my images. Preparing and uploading images takes time! And they want me to first kick in $250? This really is a sucker deal.

+1 to that Steve. Sucker deal is being nice to them! Until photographers get some balls, this exploration will continue to take advantage of the poor helpless photographers.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 01:53 UTC
In reply to:

Jim Salvas: Well, I licensed some my photos through Getty on Flickr and that was a worse deal. They sell an image for $800, and I get just $160.

I pulled all my work off of 500px as a protest and sent them a e-mail which they didn't respond to. 500px became successful on the backs of hard working dedicated photographers and are now screwing all of them. Digital has made professional photography a thing of the past now 500px is putting the last nail in the coffin.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 01:49 UTC
In reply to:

joexu: Hope Sony will introduce a e-mount version of the 70-400mm

Its so massive! 840g 6.4" long. The Nikon is 3.5 lbs almost 10" with an adapter.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 18:55 UTC
On article Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

Biowizard: Does this early cut-price offer indicated that the CC "rental" concept was a comparative flop?


Google has them loosing sleep with their free online editing. Adobe has been screwing us all for years now their coming back for more. In 12 months the price will be $30 and up up and away from there. No thanks!

Link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 21:30 UTC
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1391 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jeff Morris: I myself sold all of my DSLR equipment. I like many other hobbyist enthusiasts have gotten tired of the large amount of equipment and the difficulty transporting it. It does not mean we do not appreciate what a great DSLR and lenses can provide the professional and advanced amateur. It simply means many people are looking for an alternative.

A year ago I purchased a Fuji X-E1. I absolutely love the camera. I plan on making a kit of a wide, normal and tele zooms. I should be very satisfied. If someday I decide to go back to DSLR's then so be it. But more and more we are seeing advanced amateurs and pro's embracing mirrorless for it's excellent performance, lite weight and compact form factor.

Lets face it, we needed a penta-prism back in the day, however today is a different story.

Where is the film box end holder on the back so I don't forget what films in the camera? If it was 36mp I would consider it.

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2013 at 20:14 UTC
On article Adobe releases Photoshop Lightroom 5 (252 comments in total)

Not enough improvements and cost to much for nothing.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2013 at 21:11 UTC as 37th comment
On article Adobe releases Photoshop Lightroom 5 (252 comments in total)
In reply to:

nekrosoft13: is there facial recognition?

Capture One!

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2013 at 13:41 UTC
On article Photoshop Gradient Tool: Part 2 - Adjusting Images (87 comments in total)

Capture One is much faster and better for gradients at the raw level. Even lightroom is better and not overly complicated like Photoshop, I don't have 20 minutes to do each gradient.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2013 at 12:16 UTC as 25th comment

Don't forget ,
Beste CSC Expert Lens: Sony E-mount 10-18mm f/4 OSS.

The Sony 10-18mm zoom lens offers a constant aperture of f/4 throughout its entire range, an equivalent focal length of 15-27mm. This lightweight (8 oz, 225 gms) lens is constructed of 10 elements in 8 groups and contains 3 aspherical elements and an optical system with Super Extra-low dispersion glass for near elimination of chromatic aberrations, even at the widest focal length setting. Optical Steady Shot image stabilization adds significant versatility to this lens and maximizes its impressive performance when shooting both stills and video, even in low light situations. An internal focusing system and circular shutter blades round out the impressive specifications.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2013 at 01:07 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply

Just downloaded and installed GIMP and am totally blown away by what this program can do! I've been using Photoshop for over 20 years and can say right now I will never go back. Gimp is capable of doing 90% of everything Photoshop can and it's free. It is so much more customizable and friendly than Adobe. I would imagine with all our support it would become the quintessential editing program. In combination with capture one 7 there is no more need for Adobe's BS. Gimp works on both Windows and Mac.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 19:29 UTC as 94th comment | 2 replies
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1842 comments in total)

What I like about Adobe is they don't know or care that the photography business has been in the trash for about 4 years. Photographers have cut back big time, so as their profits decline adobe decides to screw them all and get their due. Let them eat cake baby!

Link | Posted on May 13, 2013 at 02:28 UTC as 98th comment | 5 replies

Looks like Corel has just launched Corel graphics Suite 6 which includes Corel capture and Corel PhotoPaint 6. I just started testing PhotoPaint 6 and can't believe what an improvement it is. It is 64-bit and blazing fast also has the ability to use Photoshop style work place. Couldn't be better timing on Corel part as far as I'm concerned. The whole suite costs under $500. I would imagine Corel would launch Photo Paint six as a standalone. It's been years since I even looked at Corel but I'm now giving it a serious once over.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 18:40 UTC as 379th comment | 6 replies

Not enough choices on this poll !! How about:
1. Lack of concern by Adobe for customers needs.
2. Minimal upgrades that do not work most of the time.
3. No credit for lifetime users.
Should be able to pick more than one answer.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 00:36 UTC as 705th comment | 1 reply
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1842 comments in total)
In reply to:

Owashi: "We don't have plans to make Lightroom a subscription-only option but we do envision added functionality for the CC version of Lightroom."

I don't like the sound of that. So we have to pay for CC or get a dumbed down version of Lightroom?

If Adobe is stupid enough to add features to cc that aren't on the standalone everyone will just stop using lightroom and go to one of the 4 or 5 really good other raw processors like capture one, Corel, DXO or silkypix just to name a few.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 16:14 UTC
On article Photoshop CC: Adobe responds to reaction (1842 comments in total)
In reply to:

powP0Wpow: Adobe: Its okay if you close your eyes and pretend its someone you like.

I purchased Corel last time Adobe went off it's Med's and am finding it to be quite good and usable for assignments. Phase One's capture one is superior in many ways to lightroom with raw output that is just amazing. All these companies will be producing more innovative tools we all need at a lower price. Adobe is showing it's true colors with huge a helping of arrogance.

Link | Posted on May 8, 2013 at 02:12 UTC
In reply to:

Jun2: Do I really need this? Spend $600 to put large FF lens to my little M4/3, NEX cameras.

If this works I would still wait for version 3. From past experience they don't stand behind releases of their product, they just want to charge more for new one. Way overpriced! If it works one of their competitors will come out one for 150 bucks

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2013 at 23:04 UTC
Total: 37, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »