Philnw2

Lives in United States Bremerton, WA, United States
Works as a Mechanical Engineer
Joined on Jan 31, 2007

Comments

Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS Rebel SL2 / EOS 200D Review (461 comments in total)

Canon says they are going to build some mirrorless cameras, but here we go again, the same old tired flapping mirror design that is so noisy and requires the post chimping to see how the image was exposed. Mirrorless shows you how the image is going to be exposed BEFORE you take the picture. Great for beginners, instead of these inscrutable flappers.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2017 at 22:57 UTC as 26th comment | 10 replies
On article Ten things we're hoping for from the Nikon D850 (479 comments in total)

I hope its the mirrorless rumored for 2017.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2017 at 18:15 UTC as 39th comment
In reply to:

caver3d: Well, well, well, Sony (and the A7RII and A9) put the heat on Nikon. They are really feeling the flames now. Nikon has seen the future (finally), and it is mirrorless. And I will happily go on shooting with my A7II and A7RII. Oh, and I still have my ground-breaking Pany G1 (which takes great pics).

For those of us that have bought Sony lenses, there very likely will be little incentive to change to a Nikon mirrorless at this point. I suspect that will be true of other mirrorless brands as well.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2017 at 00:52 UTC
In reply to:

Prairie Pal: If it is to be an ILC, then my guess is APS-C format, given Nikon's sudden revitalized interest in DX lenses.

Nikon's statement that "for a smartphone generation" is disparaging to those of us who have had DSLRs and now prefer a mirrorless. Its like Nikon still doesn't get the attractiveness of this new camera design. So if they don't understand its value, are they really going to put their heart and soul into designing one of their own? I hope they put some effort into the design, because that will be what's necessary for a successful campaign, IMO.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2017 at 00:33 UTC

Thank you for the excellent information on the differences between native mirrorless lenses and legacy lenses. I;ve also found the article on lensrental's teardown of Sony AF voice-coil lens actuators to be remarkable technology - now i know why they went to that extreme.

I do find it ironic that for all the criticism of Sony, their model of designing a new mirrorless e-mount, and then enabling a-mount lenses via a smart adapter is very likely the one that Canon and Nikon will likely use.

I wonder whether Nikon will skip the move to mirrorless entirely. Considering the investment they would need to make, they may decide to wait until further photographic technology is developed that eliminates interchangeable lenses entirely - don't know what they would be at the moment :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2017 at 18:30 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

AlexisH: CIPA figures for April illustrate ... nothing at all.

Drawing conclusions from data representing one month means nothing at all.

If you check the Note 4 column of the cipa report, it includes the first 4 months of the year compared to the same period in 2016. I'm surprised at how quickly mirrorless products are invading DSLR market space. I don't doubt that Canon will quickly get a FF mirrorless into the marketplace.

Link | Posted on Jun 14, 2017 at 05:14 UTC
In reply to:

PVCdroid: One thing is for sure. Places like Costco need to pull their head out and get some mirrorless offerings on display. It's a pathetic shrine to cheap Canikon DSLR crap as it is.

For justme, that may be true of units, but in value terms, the math is:
12,861,000/36,572,000 = .35 or 35% in revenue terms. So units may matter for some kinds of predictions, but 35% of the revenue is nothing to be sneezed at, IMO.

Since Costco is only selling Canikon, their records would show 100% of sales going to DSLRs. That shows the mistake of making predictions based on a marketplace that predetermines the kind of product that will be sold. That's why i don't buy cameras from Costco anymore - no choice.

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2017 at 19:57 UTC
In reply to:

PVCdroid: One thing is for sure. Places like Costco need to pull their head out and get some mirrorless offerings on display. It's a pathetic shrine to cheap Canikon DSLR crap as it is.

I don't even stop at the camera counter anymore because of that altho i do shop a lot at Costco. No Fuji's, no Sony, no Canon mirrorless - boring.....

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2017 at 21:42 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: CIPA figures also show that 64% of ILCs shipped this year were DSLRs, and 36% were mirrorless.

In the first 4 months of 2017, i've seen some drastic increases in shipments to the Americas. Which to me indicates that the Americas are finally becoming more aware of what mirrorless has to offer. Although overall numbers compared to DSLRs are behind other regions. Trends are important.

Link | Posted on Jun 11, 2017 at 19:18 UTC

Mirrorless has had 4 months of very nice increases in sales (in the 40% plus arena) in 2017. After each month, the "deniers" state that its an anomaly and meaningless. Well the dslr owners may consider such information to be too short term for any conclusions, but i'm pretty certain that the number of articles criticizing Nikon shows that the mfr are not ignoring the mirrorless trend.

One criticism i've seen of mirrorless is these "compare pictures" posts which typically show a f1.4 85mm lens on a Sony FF camera compared to a DSLR - and the conclusion by that writer says: "See there is no value to a mirrorless camera". Well the thing is small mirrorless camera designs such as the Sony FF cameras, will allow one to put large or small lenses on. Its your option. An FE 85 F1.4 is going to weigh more than an A-mount 85 f2.8 or even an FE 85 f1.8.

It will be interesting when Canon and Nikon go FF with a mirrorless, whether they try to go with a small body or large body or both.

Link | Posted on Jun 10, 2017 at 20:31 UTC as 26th comment | 13 replies
In reply to:

Philnw2: Not to worry, Sony is doing OK. The only expanding segment of the ILC market is the mirrorless cameras which are now 36% of ILC. Mirrorless were up 44% year on year in 2017 and its growth seems relentless. DSLRs were down year on year, but only about 9%, was it?
In the mirrorless ILC segment, these are the BCN 2017 rankings:
Olympus 26.8%
Canon 18.5%
Sony 17.9%

I think these are in terms of units, but the graph i was reading was not labelled.

Of note - Sony is the only maker of FF mirrorless which gives it a diversity that Canon doesn't have, at the moment. Sony is also the maker of MF sensors for the Pentax, Hasselbad and Fuji cameras of that size.

So yeah, i think Sony is doing well in an expanding marketplace of mirrorless, esp since the recent introduction of the A9.

I agree. Altho both CIPA unit and value numbers are up over 2016, the value numbers are up more. I think that increase in value numbers is due to FF sales by Sony, but don't know for sure. I do know that the A7rII costs significantly more than the D810. Folks grumble about the Sony prices, but it tells me that Sony can charge more for comparable FF bodies because they can get more. Mirrorless are desirable at the moment for whatever reason.
I don't begrudge Sony the higher prices because the development costs for these new features and lenses must cost a fortune. One criticism i've read is that noone needs 20fps on the A9, well then one can choose 10 or 5fps I understand. But i don't doubt that having higher fps rates for some sports activities will be highly desirable for those shooters wanting to sell the best pics to demanding customers.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 14:56 UTC

Not to worry, Sony is doing OK. The only expanding segment of the ILC market is the mirrorless cameras which are now 36% of ILC. Mirrorless were up 44% year on year in 2017 and its growth seems relentless. DSLRs were down year on year, but only about 9%, was it?
In the mirrorless ILC segment, these are the BCN 2017 rankings:
Olympus 26.8%
Canon 18.5%
Sony 17.9%

I think these are in terms of units, but the graph i was reading was not labelled.

Of note - Sony is the only maker of FF mirrorless which gives it a diversity that Canon doesn't have, at the moment. Sony is also the maker of MF sensors for the Pentax, Hasselbad and Fuji cameras of that size.

So yeah, i think Sony is doing well in an expanding marketplace of mirrorless, esp since the recent introduction of the A9.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2017 at 02:11 UTC as 8th comment | 2 replies

I find all these disparaging remarks about Sony quite puzzling. Sony is rapidly pushing the technical boundaries of mirrorless cameras, e.g. 693 AF points, 20fps with tracking, no-lag viewfinders, etc. I bought my A7rii in August 2015, and i find it a lot of fun and also effective to shoot with. It has allowed me to change my shooting practices for the better.

Nikon currently has a larger market share, but its profits and sales are sliding. They do have a new management structure reported this month by DPR. Canon should be delighted Sony is in the game, Sony owners are buying enough of their Lenses from them :-)

Let's hope that as many photography companies as possible survive the smart phone era.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2017 at 01:54 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)
In reply to:

Philnw2: The complaint about "mirrorless blackout" from some DSLR owners has been eliminated. I have to admire the audacity of Sony in producing such a beast. Some have complained about the cost, but it is 2/3rds the cost of the Nikon D5 and yet has a much higher continuous frame rate at 20fps. The A9 is an amazing achievement!

"lamest and least informed" - how rude you are. Do you have to work at being rude are does it come naturally. Have you watched the Tony and Chelsea Northrup youtube video on the A9 comparing it to the D5 and the Canon??. Have you read the specs on the A9 or are you just making up your comments as i suspect. I have and the A9 outdoes the D5 i some critical areas. Silence and in 20fps compared to the D5's 14 frames per second. If you're trying to catch that baseball at the precise moment it hits the bat, you'd have a far better chance with the A9. If you'd done any research on the A9 you could write something intelligent instead of just throwing insults.

Link | Posted on May 6, 2017 at 17:45 UTC
On article Sony a9: Why being better might not be enough (767 comments in total)
In reply to:

roweraay: There are several genres of photography, including events (meetings, weddings for instance), travel, landscape etc. The A9 (and associated native lenses) may be exactly what one needs, for such activities, where silent shooting and fast AF acquisition would be big pluses.

By assuming that Sony's sole target is Sports photography, one may be missing the forest for the trees.

Torn - thanks for pointing that out. Those pros that shoot Olympics are probably a minority compared to those pros that own/rent their own equpment and shoot wedding/portraits/commercial work, etc. Those pros should not have much difficulty in converting to the A9, A7rii, as appropriate. The longer lenses will come. The Silent Shutter feature is no minor advantage to shooting in meetings, plays, musical recitals, etc. I shot plays for 7 years and always wished for a silent shutter - now i have one in my A7rii. Folks have been disparaging Sony since they brought out the first mirrorless Nex cameras. Sony is racing to put out new innovations that i don't see coming from other camera companies - with the exception of Olympus. Sony is definitely needed in the photography field.

Link | Posted on Apr 26, 2017 at 21:52 UTC
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1909 comments in total)

The complaint about "mirrorless blackout" from some DSLR owners has been eliminated. I have to admire the audacity of Sony in producing such a beast. Some have complained about the cost, but it is 2/3rds the cost of the Nikon D5 and yet has a much higher continuous frame rate at 20fps. The A9 is an amazing achievement!

Link | Posted on Apr 20, 2017 at 14:06 UTC as 67th comment | 4 replies
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (890 comments in total)

EVF definitely. Flexibility of display options is helpful. I have a full time histogram display and a level display. WYSIWYG. With OVF, all you get is blinking lights to show something is off. With EVF, you see what is wrong immediately. I once met with 2 friends in a cafe to compare our OVF cameras to a Sony A7r and a A7s. My aps DSLR had such a dim OVF compared to the Sonys that i thought it was broken. No more chimping for me. The other selling point for me is that when you throw out the pentaprisms and all that mirror stuff, you end up with a lighter smaller camera body. My FF A7rii body is smaller much lighter than my APS DSLR. If you combine that body with small lightweight primes or no more than F4 zooms, then one has something easy to carry and very capable.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 15:01 UTC as 121st comment

A few years back I bought two of their manual flashes. Easy to figure out and very reliable. I wouldn't hesitate to buy this lens after we get a few reports back. I see copycat actions going on between Japanese photography companies as well.

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2016 at 17:19 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Richt2000: Looks really really cheap and nasty build quality for the money.

Canon have been a bit dull for 5 years now. Just churning out incremental updates and half a55ed attempts.

Pull you socks up Canon.

When the Canon Chief Executive announced in 2014 that they were shortly going to build a large format mirrorless - i believed him. What a joke that is now. Here's Sony with a FF A7r2, which i love the resolution of, and Canon, with the best they can do, with the M5. I'm sorry, but the Canon body candidate is just not competitive 2 years later. It doesn't seem like Canon cares about the mirrorless type of camera - does it?????? If they had cared - they would have put more effort into it. Sad to see because i think Canon makes some really fine lenses, which i just bought one for my Sony FF mirrorless. And it works great!

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 04:57 UTC
In reply to:

Philnw2: OK - point well made. But can anyone show me a camera that is perfect? There are none - they are all a set of compromises. I've only had my A7Rm2 a week today - but i love it - artifacts, warts and all. Its got the largest VF out there on a FF camera. Its quieter than the DSLRs i tried, and about 1/2 their weight. No micro phase calibrations anymore - Nearly every shot i've taken has been sharp with this camera, in manual mode or AF.
I've joined a really cool gallery recently, i'm the only photographer, and i've discovered that none of the painters is concerned about the artifacts with their paint strokes. I know that is a shocking fact for some.

I hope that Sony will fix this problem, but i won't be returning this camera, its too dang good in so many other ways. There is no other FF mirrorless camera out there. I shot with a Nikon D4 in a blind before i bought the Sony. And the racket from the shutter was so loud this stellar jay looked up to find the noise.

The question above about whether noise could cause deterioration of IQ. Noise is an indication that the cam. body is vibrating. That means that the mirror is also vibrating. Both the D800 and A7R were affected. There were complaints about blur on both cameras - a friend of mine sold his D800 because he was disastified with the clarity, then bought a D750 that he's been very happy with. Dpreview did a article on shutter shock in both cameras. Nikon and Sony both did compensatory design actions in follow-on cameras. Sony for example put a carbon fiber shutter in the A7RII. Nikon put an Electronic First Curtain shutter in some D810 version. Whether blurriness will show up is dependent on shutter speed as well.
I love the camera, wish it had better RAW, but each of us have to make choices.

Link | Posted on Sep 8, 2015 at 06:05 UTC
Total: 31, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »