PedroMZ

May I suggest number 11 would do well as DPR's test chart.

To quote a famous English footballer--"the more I practice the luckier I get".

entoman-well I am a rank amateur so the question doesn't arise,but I do get my best shots enlarged and I have been asked if it is a lucky shot or not. For my own satisfaction I am obviously more...

and you WOULD be pretty shaky having spent this much on it!

I feel the shutter speed is a little too slow,the second boy is almost impossible to make out. Quite effective nether the less.

entoman- the viewer will think it is skill,only you will know if it is that or luck. Take any great street photographer and his/her iconic photos. We only see the best,and if you take thousands...

Ooops!

Market share alas does matter and influences one's choice .Take Pentax for example,they make excellent cameras and cost wise are very competitive , but their sales in the UK are small ,one of main...

It appears that the rocks to the right (of the lighthouse) below the low lying wall are not identical,on one shot they appear more exposed. I would not have noticed the difference in the railings.

as long as it is the truth which appears not to have been the case here.

Steve/Entoman--your arguments are of course valid,however I am rather defensive about MFT which contributors constantly decry. I was just making the point that it is horses for courses. For many...

As this may be used for sports or wildlife I cannot see where a razor thin depth of field is an advantage,a little leeway is surely helpful. For portraits you would probably use a prime in any case.

At Iso 200-400,on A3 at 18 inches, can you tell the difference?

Does that mean that the new RAW format will not be recognised by Lightroom 6?

looks a very inviting package IF,and it is a big if, the lens is decently sharp. Its predecessor was below par even at the wide end compared to the Sony RX 100 lens.

dp fan--- your arguments are what exactly?

I find it surprising that photographers take more than 300 photos per day. Surely greater selectivity is required. Should the need arise an extra battery is neither expensive or heavy. Why the fuss?

Stunning,professional photography was being taken on 10MP sensors fit for magazine spreads only a few years ago. So why is a modern 20MP sensor regarded as a toy? I accept that these sensors do...

Alas because few people buy them now.

but a lot of advances and probably the sensor are thanks to Sony who have forced all other manufacturers to up their game.