bakhtyar kurdi

did anyone used this lens with TCs? I have the Canon version,  using it on Sony A7R II and Canon M50 Is there anyway to use this lens with TCs? I am thinking of a Sony SEL20TC, a Sony E mount TC, ...

Thanks everyone for their advises Now I have a good idea

Hi Just bought a Canon  M50 I have many Canon EF and EF-S lenses The original Canon adapter here in Canada is $200 while there is third party adapters for under $50 The question is , are those ...

I have The 70-300 G1 and the 70-400 G2 on A7Rii+LA-EA3 and LA-EA2 Firstly the 70-300 will not communicate at all with LA-EA3 So I modified the LA-EA2 to cover the full frame and it works Both ...

Agreed, that is what I was trying to explain The Last Nikon I had was a D810, so I don't know how better the D850 in that regard, but I see Sony is much easier and I can't image how is it possible ...

If you use native Sony lenses, it is much faster and more accurate I am using some Nikon lenses with Vello adapter too, but it is no where as good as native lenses , or adapted Canon lenses Yes you ...

As I said before, no camera (Sony in my experience ) can detect birds or animal eyes So no help with BIFs But for humans, yes , you can depend on the eye AF, and with some camera-lens combinations, ...

I don't think that any Sony cameras recognize animal eyes, so yes it is not made for wild life photography .

I will tell you one scenario that is really really important to have Eye AF There is many fast lenses at the market now, for example Nikon and Sigma 105/1.4 or Sigma 135 1.8 I own the Sigma 135 I ...

They have road map for the next 15 years at least.

I don't think Nikon is stupid
If they put everything you dream about in Z7, how do you want them to sell their Z7s?

Recently bought two lenses, the Sigma 135/1.8, and the Sony FE 85/1.8 I am very happy with both, for sharpness they are very close, very sharp wide open, the Sony lens is totally quite , while the ...

Is is possible to convert a Sigma 135/1.8 ART Canon mount to Sony FE mount by sending it to Sigma, and how much it costs ? Is it a good idea to do that, while on MC-11 is not bad at all? thanks

Sigma 100-400 was $850 in Canada, and now it is $930 Where is the discount?

I am using the Nikon version of the lens with Vello adapter, also I have the Canon 16-35/4 IS with sigma mc-11 adapter. The Tamron is focusing very fast, VC is amazing, it is Sharper than Canon, ...

I am using the Nikon version of Tamron 15-30 on my Sony A7RII, with Vello adapter, version 6 firmware, it works perfectly, very fast focusing and accurate.

You can check here

Anyways, for those who interested , I tried 3 Sigma lenses Nikon mount on Sony A7RII, no eye af works with any of them. Sigma 135/ 1.8 ART focuses very fast and accurate. Sigma 85/1.4 Art , focuses ...

I thought it good to have lenses work on multiple systems

Thanks will check that