boarderphreak

I would certainly agree on both.

The X-T1/2 is just as much a tool; just for a different set of tasks.

I love my X-T2... And will continue to.

So many parallels... "Leica" and "most expensive" and will never take any pictures.

Pppssshhh. Everybody knows that all the cool phones have four.

It's a Das Keyboard with a lens. And an extra two zeroes in the price.

No more 50mm f/1.1 I guess... Wonder if they addressed the focus shift?

No. ;)

Tokina... Now there's a company that comes to mind when I'm thinking "high-end lens." 🙄

Linux on the desktop is perfectly usable. My gripes are mainly from a UI perspective.

You don't have to. It just quietly runs all the clouds and vast majority of servers out there. Desktop, sure. That's still a bit of a joke.

LOL... <right click> "View image..." Voila. 🙄

What, does it install Linux for you? 🤣

The future isn't about MP - it's about DR.

Who said ANY of that was in the recipe in the first place?

No. Just stabilization.

I with you on this. The IBIS is somewhat compelling, but I'm sticking with the X-T2. It suits me better and I've no interest in video anyway.

DSLR sales have been declining for quite a while now - and will continue to do so. If and when they get serious about mirrorless, everybody else will have already entrenched themselves; and not...

But you'd still end up with a larger camera. And if you wanted to really take advantage of the GFX batteries, you'd still buy at least one if not more. And what about the grip? Charger?

So you'd rather have a larger camera and have to buy all new batteries instead?