greg57

Full-frame digital cameras used to be geared towards professional photographers but have now become a more mainstream consumer product. From what I understand, a majority of DPR commenters are ...

They're talking about the new 40mm equivalent Ricoh.

I'm not sure why more people don't mention the Tamron 17-28. It's not the very sharpest  lens you can find but it's extremely decent quality wise, it's a 2.8 constant zoom under $1000. Its usage ...

Yes it was exactly the same for me!  And then as I found myself investigating again for a new lens, I checked again the reviews out of curiosity and it was a whole different landscape of opinions ...

Yes I've owned it for 10 days or so now and so far I can say I'm very happy about this lens. Be it it AF performance, or the sharpness or the bokeh. I've owned a few lenses in the past and this ...

Yes I’ve read the same thing and then I decided to focus on the positive aspects  this kind of negative things is often exaggerated, or maybe happened to a couple of reviewers and then gets ...

You really might want to consider the Sigma 24-70. Image quality is just excellent.

Thank you for your answer. Yes it was on and gosh, noticeable difference when it isn't. I guess I should just pull the trigger and buy a geared head to help me find these verticals in a more ...

Hi Newdon, you might want to consider the Sigma 24-70 2.8. I bought it recently after a lot of research and I am extremely pleased with is sharpness and the beauty of its out of focus areas (very ...

Hello! I'm a happy-ish user of a a7III + Tamron 17-28 combo which I use on a tripod for real estate shootings (general views with or without HDR bracketing). This combo is doing the job quite well ...

Looks very promising but it doesn't bide well about image quality or AF that they advertise it as a "travel lens" I fear. With this zoom range and brightness, it would be the ultimate...

Hello, I'm selling my fantastic Sony 24-105 f4 in order to finance the purchase of a Sigma 24-70 2.8. Price: 800€ shipping not included.

You do sound like a f@nb0y to be frank.

Come on man, you already know the answer to this question :)