WolfpackN64

As long as many people keep using it, it isn't obsolete.

I see what you mean, but I don't doubt the image quality or comparative ease of use of digital cameras at all.
Of course I shoot digital as well (I occsionaly shoot film for fun).
But considering...

The image quality looks ok I guess? Don't know if this is due to compression or the subject matter not really standing out.

You don't carry a developing tank and the whole shebang on your trips, now do you?

Why are some of you so eager to proclaim the "death of the DSLR"? It's like proclaiming the "death of the desktop PC", done for years with no result.

I think most hobbyist photographers should look what's available at their pricepoint, whether that is a MILC or a DLSR and pick what they like. There is also no point in disregarding DSLR's and in...

I'm no stranger to photograpy, but after using a handmedown Olympus E-400 on the very dead Four Thirds system, the jump to a modern 24MP APS-C camera is really noticable (Even then, the E-400's...

You might as well buy a point and shoot then. I never look through the screen on my Nikon D3500 save when I'm filming something.
Of course, it could also be that Canon just dropped the ball in...

If you're shooting stills, the OVF is your primary method of framing your picture, no matter the other features.

Is it just me or are film SLR's generally quite a bit smaller then their full frame DSLR counterparts?

I have a OnePlus One. Granted, not the best camera. Father has an iPhone 8. Not very spectacular. Mother has an iPhone 10. Not very spectacular. Went on Scout camp last year and someone took photos...

I have, and I can't say I'm ever impressed by them.

When you look at these pictures through a smartphone screen maybe? I can always tell a smartphone picture from a DSLR or MILC quite easily. Granted smartphones can take good pictures, but they're...

They will replace small point and shoots. For stills and videos, they will always be significantly worse then DSLR's and dedicated Mirorless cameras.

No, because I value art purely on it's subjective merits. My phone needs to do a certain amount of things for me. Things like brand, looks, bells and whitsles are secundary to specs, build quality...

I tend to judge value more on a material cost + labor theory of value basis rather then subjective value.
Of course a Galaxy F has more subjective value to a tech journalist and youtuber then to a...

$100 - $200 "LESS", not $100 - $200 as pricepoint.
And I'm just making astute observations, not telling other what to buy or not. Arguably, no major modern flagship smartphone are good value. I...

No, because $400 is still a lot of money for a phone and you can get comparable midrangers for $100 - 200 less.
Remember when flagships were $400?
I use a OnePlus One btw.

Still too expensive for what it is, but undeniably a better deal then the regular Pixel 3.

Sure. I'd rather have a good welfare state then nearly no taxes. But our state(s) aren't very efficiënt and our VAT is very high (coupled with high income taxes (even for people who don't make all...