WolfpackN64

@San2C

It's easy to say it's nostalgic garbage and the way you get your results don't matter, but it isn't true. Not in photography or any other art. Most people might not care what kind of paint...

Scanned film still differs significantly from a digital image. The digital image is a capture from how the sensor interprets real world data, the scanned image is a capture of how the sensor...

It's about the process and the result. It makes shooting harder and you can't emulate the effect film gives digitally (not perfectly anyway)

I scan my film at home and edit where I deem it necessary

@Pseu_Pseu_Pseudonym

The point is, the format isn't dead. Kodak can't keep up with demand and Adox is launching a new emulsion. Not much of a dead format.

Other than the grain, it looks really nice in my opinion. But that could be due to the scan as well.

Have you tried recreating a "film look" digitally? Doesn't really work all that great. People who want the film look will keep shooting it.

Because people like shooting film?
I shoot more film than digital now. Not because it's objectively better or easier, but because I like the process more.
Why do people listen to lp's in the...