Chris62

Joined on Dec 14, 2010

Comments

Total: 59, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article Samsung offers NX1 and NX500 firmware updates (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Even now negative PR against Samsung is active.
I red so many stupid things in comments and I wonder who does pay for writing such text.
It was always present on many forums.
Many people can not think and they buy things the marketing says they should buy.
Samsung cameras wheer great for spome purposes and people who can think, who have some knowledge know it.
The problem is agressive marketing rulez and 50% of tv programs is marketing brain washing.
There are people who always tell you what you should buy even in reality you do not need it.

First define the word marketing.
We must differ real marketing let's say presentation of product advantages from negative PR for competitive products that uses lies about product features etc.
In example if X company marketing makes adverts for their products it is OK but if this PR is about Y company products it is non fair - but...this is the World...

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2016 at 10:21 UTC
On article Samsung offers NX1 and NX500 firmware updates (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Even now negative PR against Samsung is active.
I red so many stupid things in comments and I wonder who does pay for writing such text.
It was always present on many forums.
Many people can not think and they buy things the marketing says they should buy.
Samsung cameras wheer great for spome purposes and people who can think, who have some knowledge know it.
The problem is agressive marketing rulez and 50% of tv programs is marketing brain washing.
There are people who always tell you what you should buy even in reality you do not need it.

Peiasdf It was impossible in the world where the strongest marketing had Olympus and Sony.
Some people like me are resistant for marketing but some not.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 09:18 UTC
On article Samsung offers NX1 and NX500 firmware updates (159 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Even now negative PR against Samsung is active.
I red so many stupid things in comments and I wonder who does pay for writing such text.
It was always present on many forums.
Many people can not think and they buy things the marketing says they should buy.
Samsung cameras wheer great for spome purposes and people who can think, who have some knowledge know it.
The problem is agressive marketing rulez and 50% of tv programs is marketing brain washing.
There are people who always tell you what you should buy even in reality you do not need it.

No I do not. Samsung has no marketing at all in photo you know.
Buy whatever you like - like me - I like NX and I've been using it for six years.
Probably you wonder I did not buy leading Canon, Nikon or another?
Can you imagine I can see many advantages in this system?

We NX users have lost a lot because of that aggressive negative PR and no pro PR and no strategic offence from Samsung who prefers to make business in mobiles. than photo.
Even now, when NX is discontinued we can see in comments many non true opinions.
Why?

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 08:55 UTC
On article Samsung offers NX1 and NX500 firmware updates (159 comments in total)

Even now negative PR against Samsung is active.
I red so many stupid things in comments and I wonder who does pay for writing such text.
It was always present on many forums.
Many people can not think and they buy things the marketing says they should buy.
Samsung cameras wheer great for spome purposes and people who can think, who have some knowledge know it.
The problem is agressive marketing rulez and 50% of tv programs is marketing brain washing.
There are people who always tell you what you should buy even in reality you do not need it.

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 09:04 UTC as 11th comment | 7 replies
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: So.... we can say D80 is disappointing.

The newest model from the leading producer in this price should be equipped with BSI CMOS sensor (it could solve DR issue), 4k movies and photo mode to be competitive to Panasonic 4k cameras or Sony A6300, and should be ff/bf issues free.

Maybe next model will be better and meet the expectations ???

Two years old Samsung NX1 body beats this Canon in every aspect (except of system age lens & accessories offer and mirror difference of course )

mkbrkloster (4 days ago)
"Chris62 - Fair enough, but when you buy a body, you buy the system. Any evaluation must include both."
===================
And Canon lens system is optimised for APS_C sensor? I do not think so...

Even Canon does not offer so great small pancakes as Samsung NX.
Is here any zoom 16-50/F2-F2,8 for Canon?

We can discuss about system lenses too but not in this topic.
We evaluate 80D BODY.
So I say this is old fashioned technology in the newest APS_C model (only Dual Pixel is nice)
Probably for marketing political reasons - next year Canon will place 4k BSI CMOS maybe something else and marketing will say 90D is much better than 80D and so on...
For system user such politic can be disappointing - do not you think?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 06:50 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: So.... we can say D80 is disappointing.

The newest model from the leading producer in this price should be equipped with BSI CMOS sensor (it could solve DR issue), 4k movies and photo mode to be competitive to Panasonic 4k cameras or Sony A6300, and should be ff/bf issues free.

Maybe next model will be better and meet the expectations ???

Two years old Samsung NX1 body beats this Canon in every aspect (except of system age lens & accessories offer and mirror difference of course )

mkbrkloster - I only compared two bodies in technological aspects.
As I said as a potential customer I would expect more from the best producer.
If you are satisfied OK.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 07:07 UTC
On article 2016 Roundup: Enthusiast Long Zoom Cameras (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

FuhTeng: I'm excited for the RX10 III - what a fun camera to rent for a vacation! Sure, it's expensive, but it's a 600 mm f4 lens! I just hope the AF is up to the task.

And if it's not, the Nikon DL24-500 sounds great too.

But in case of 600 mm ultra shallow DOF probably is not the priority.
F4 allows to use lower ISO for demanded shutter value.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 06:53 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (707 comments in total)

So.... we can say D80 is disappointing.

The newest model from the leading producer in this price should be equipped with BSI CMOS sensor (it could solve DR issue), 4k movies and photo mode to be competitive to Panasonic 4k cameras or Sony A6300, and should be ff/bf issues free.

Maybe next model will be better and meet the expectations ???

Two years old Samsung NX1 body beats this Canon in every aspect (except of system age lens & accessories offer and mirror difference of course )

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2016 at 13:32 UTC as 63rd comment | 18 replies
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (296 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: In general 80D seems very good camera but...
2014' Samsung NX1 is much better....
Why the most powerfull photo company as Canon is produces cameras with outdated technologies?
Sony in A6300 also uses newer technologies.

In Canon's user shoes I would wait for 90D with 4k and BSI CMOS + copper tracks sensor.
This model will be outdadet soon.

4K is not only for movies useful.
Panasonic/Samsung offers also 4k photo mode (8MP stills useful for unexpected scenes).
And even today FHD is good enough in the future will look as today VHS looks on FHD screen...

I have an impression Canon and Nikon do not want to much progress in cameras.
Every new model a little better evolution not revolution - but competition accelerates and this way of thinking can lead to customers loosing. How long they can buy the established brand's name?
Kodak was so powerfull and now is nearly forgotten.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 12:29 UTC
On article Power Zoom: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100/TZ100 Review (330 comments in total)

The studio scene shows decentered lens ....

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 09:53 UTC as 69th comment
On article Taking it easy: Canon EOS 80D shooting experience (296 comments in total)

In general 80D seems very good camera but...
2014' Samsung NX1 is much better....
Why the most powerfull photo company as Canon is produces cameras with outdated technologies?
Sony in A6300 also uses newer technologies.

In Canon's user shoes I would wait for 90D with 4k and BSI CMOS + copper tracks sensor.
This model will be outdadet soon.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 10:46 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies

The King of hybrid cameras ever build?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 10:27 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Chris62: Oh..wow?????
Samsung NX1 presented in 2014 is better specification.

I prefer NX1. (but maybe not with Pentax lens used in test scene of course)

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2016 at 12:51 UTC
In reply to:

Chris62: Oh..wow?????
Samsung NX1 presented in 2014 is better specification.

OK if somebody cares about it.
DSLR also interrupts view even in optical viewfinder because of mirror movements and nobody cares.
NX1 offers 15 fps - in such speed i would see nothing between shots. A6300 ofers this function up to 8 fps.
The only parameter that is intersting in A6300 for me is new AF system but now it is only theory and marketing.
What will be in reality we will see.
And other points as sensor, 4k movies, data prcessing, shutter seems bettter in NX1 not forget nearly 2 years older.
A6300 price similar as Panasonic GX8 is ..crazy.

Link | Posted on Feb 9, 2016 at 07:56 UTC

Oh..wow?????
Samsung NX1 presented in 2014 is better specification.

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 10:33 UTC as 21st comment | 4 replies
On article Samsung NX30 Review (431 comments in total)
In reply to:

AlienAl: It would be great to know (1) what lenses were used in the test shots in Studio Comparison, (2) what apertures were used, and (3) to be able to compare two different lenses, even on the same camera. I hope/presume dpreview is using the kit lenses (where applicable), the ones most folks want to see. E.g., I'm interested in the Samsung NX500 - mainly the kit lens (the 16-50mm 3,5-5,6/16-50 PZ ED OIS). If I compare it to any other camera, I don't know how to judge. (I'd like to compare it also to its superior, heavier sibling, the 16-50mm f2-2.8 S ED OIS, just to see what you get for the extra money.) The Imaging Resource has NX500 tests done with a Samsung 60mm macro, to which the kit lens probably can not be compared - the mannikin looks as sharp as can be, but I don't think you'll get this with the kit lens, even though it seems to be rather good, better than average. So that's not very helpful. (This comment is here because the page for the NX500 doesn't allow for it.)

I suppose NX cameras in studio scene were tested with Pentax 50 mm lens attached via adopter.
Frankly speaking I prefer my pancake 30/F2 than this Pentax lens.
Kit 16-50 rather is not the best. I think good copy of 18-55 OIS 3 is much better but it is larger.
Every kit lens is slow I do not accept slow lens - no DOF control and high ISO needed.
If you want to use NX500 I think 3 pancakes 16/F2,4; /30/F2; 45/F1,8 are the best and the cheapest option because 16-50/F2-F2,8 is much more expensive and you will get tele end F2,8 only.

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 15:26 UTC
On article 2015 Roundup: Advanced Zoom Compacts (148 comments in total)

Looking for the prices ...hmm.
I bought my Samsuung NX30 DX 20 MP - full equipped body even EVF with rotation possibility, touch sreen - super amoled, 9 fps, cheaper then majority of these tested compact cameras and Lightroom and lens included.and even additional lenses does not achieved RX100IV price.
I prefer this camera than these cameras and there are even cheaper as NX20 or NX300 or NX3000 or with the best sensor in price range as NX500.

I also have compact camera Panasonic LX7 - it is good camera but together with optional Viewfinder I have paid more than for this Samsung and of courseLX7 does not much to NX30 and even small zoom aspect is solveed by NX 16-50/F3,5-F5,6 PZ lens and zoom in small package was the only reason I bought LX7.

The camera market is very rich now, so the choise is difficult if we take the paremeters/price ratio into the consideration.
I think in case of compact cameras price includes very high marketing costs and customers pay for it.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2015 at 08:20 UTC as 15th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Review (495 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Mirrorles world is dominated by Sony A7 series, so particulary MFT cameras looks as the toys now.
I do not see any reason to buy toys from this system - poor technical properties particulary in comparison to FF from Sony and high prices not only cameras but more important lens also are expensive and remember that F2,8 on MFT offers GO creating possibility as F5,6 on FF.

Panasonic makes great cameras butseriously limited with 4/3 sensor.

When I write enthusiastic comment to this Pansonic than it will not be a trolling - yes?
For marketing guys every negative comment is a reason to attack its author.
I started with technical comaprison to competition and GX7 properties and you say about market share, someone else called me an idiot - Is there any sense of such discussion?
For me not, Thank you.

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2015 at 09:50 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Review (495 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Mirrorles world is dominated by Sony A7 series, so particulary MFT cameras looks as the toys now.
I do not see any reason to buy toys from this system - poor technical properties particulary in comparison to FF from Sony and high prices not only cameras but more important lens also are expensive and remember that F2,8 on MFT offers GO creating possibility as F5,6 on FF.

Panasonic makes great cameras butseriously limited with 4/3 sensor.

This way we can have conclusion that smartphones dominated photo marked and all cameras are niche products...
I do not want play with marketing and numer of sales, who sad that everybode needs a camera?
I prefer compare technical properties.
and to find compromise between as good as possible camera technical properties and price.
This is equipment for people who know what they need and why.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2015 at 09:44 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Review (495 comments in total)
In reply to:

Chris62: Mirrorles world is dominated by Sony A7 series, so particulary MFT cameras looks as the toys now.
I do not see any reason to buy toys from this system - poor technical properties particulary in comparison to FF from Sony and high prices not only cameras but more important lens also are expensive and remember that F2,8 on MFT offers GO creating possibility as F5,6 on FF.

Panasonic makes great cameras butseriously limited with 4/3 sensor.

Market share numbers....did I say about it?
Hello,wake up! look to the picture quality, comapre results and prices. IMO Sony A7 line wins.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2015 at 07:27 UTC
Total: 59, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »