sdribetahi

Joined on May 21, 2013

Comments

Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On article Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows (1377 comments in total)

'In my hands again' should have some old geezer in the commercial holding it (maybe someone from this forum), as the guy in the ad was like 3 when that style camera was popular.

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 20:14 UTC as 354th comment | 6 replies
In reply to:

inevitable crafts studio: who cares, its a sony ^^ i rather buy a camera of some other tv companies like panasonic or samsung then a walkman camera ..

At least they won't be out of business in 5 years. Enjoy your bankruptcy Nikon.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2013 at 17:53 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)
In reply to:

Brooks11: Thinking about purchasing this camera. I would like some feedback on how this camera works with the 7-14mm Lumix lens. Specifically fringing.

Enjoy your purple flare!

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 12:00 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review (2068 comments in total)

Why don't they ever test AF with moving objects. It's not even discussed? If I don't shoot still life scenes, what am I getting with AF, or AF tracking?

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 22:57 UTC as 201st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

babalu: Pablo Picasso did this 64 years ago :
http://life.time.com/culture/pablo-picasso-draws-with-light-1949/#1

If someone invented a time machine and dpr wrote about it, someone would complain in the comment section.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 19:37 UTC
On article Niki Feijen's haunting images of abandoned houses (218 comments in total)
In reply to:

sdribetahi: The same anti-hdr people never seem to complain about too much added grain to the want-to-be 1960's b&w pretend Leica post work for street shooting. Funny, my eye's don't see grain when it gets dark either.

Carabas,

It's called art. Ever heard of that? It's an opinion that it's ruined? Do ALL pictures need to be done the exact same way. "well if he just did the way every picture should be done, blah, blah, blah." You can be a critic all you want, but don't stifle the creativity. It's like telling an artist he should have represented the scene a different way. He's probably tell you where you can shove your opinion and see if any light hits it.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 17:24 UTC
On article Niki Feijen's haunting images of abandoned houses (218 comments in total)

The same anti-hdr people never seem to complain about too much added grain to the want-to-be 1960's b&w pretend Leica post work for street shooting. Funny, my eye's don't see grain when it gets dark either.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2013 at 15:16 UTC as 19th comment | 4 replies
On article Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' (546 comments in total)

Old people and bird shooters don't want video on their camera because they think it drives up the cost with a feature they don't use. So now you get a $3000 camera and no video. This is why we can't have nice things. Thanks for nothing.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2013 at 20:44 UTC as 187th comment | 4 replies
On article Leica unveils D-Lux 6 Silver Edition (92 comments in total)

Not mentioned, but this comes with a name, history and photo of the lamb used to make your pouch.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 16:36 UTC as 47th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

JohnEwing: It's OK. But who the hell would want it?

Well if you don't, I guess nobody will. Someone better call Ricoh and tell them quickly.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2013 at 12:38 UTC
In reply to:

harold1968: This must be a fashion
Am I the only one that doesn't want wood within a mile of my camera ?

I'd be concentrating more on the helmet section if I were you.

Link | Posted on Oct 22, 2013 at 12:36 UTC
In reply to:

rusticus: why the fuss, or hype - I use my awesome at GM1 20er pancake ;) I do not need this Pana-Leica really

I love the 'well I don't need it, so why did they make it' comments.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 22:03 UTC
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (184 comments in total)
In reply to:

alan900: What do I think? I think you should be finding out the facts and reporting them.

Lighten up Frances, DPR isn't the Associated press.

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 22:02 UTC
In reply to:

sdribetahi: Wow, you can hardly see the poor people.

North Korea said, "shoot anything you want, as long as it's not the common people. That's our job".

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2013 at 16:35 UTC

Wow, you can hardly see the poor people.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2013 at 15:20 UTC as 31st comment | 5 replies
On article 5 new must-have photo editing apps (99 comments in total)

Why is every photo app just a series of crappy scene filters to make your picture look like it's from various terrible cameras from 1970?

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2013 at 14:01 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

jaygeephoto: This is Pentax's chance to go after the fat cats pushing their wears at every consumer point. I know that marketing is expensive and breaking into markets is arduous. As good as this camera is it won't make a dent in the market unless it's sold well.

You do realize a company can make money without being the biggest, right? Oops, you don't. Their goal is to sell enough to make money, even if you can't see the dent.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 15:27 UTC
On article Zeiss announces 'no compromise' Otus 55mm F1.4 (488 comments in total)
In reply to:

rb59020: Here we go again, another Zeiss bashing session. Most of the readers here would have no problem blowing $800-$1000 on an unlocked iPhone5s that will be obsolete in six months.

What did you people do before the F3AF came out in '83? OMG! It's not autofocus! How am I supposed to take a photo without autofocus!?!

Whaaaaa!

Well, I was a child, so not much. Why is everyone else in here a senior citizen?

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2013 at 11:55 UTC
Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »