jaygeephoto

jaygeephoto

Joined on Sep 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 243, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sony a6000 (102 comments in total)

Although I'm a Canon(pro equipment) guy for the most part; this seems like a better camera than the new G - Especially the fact that it has a built in flash AND a viewfinder. Waiting for the inevitable DP showdown between the latest round of high end compact mirrorless.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 18:29 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On article Waterproof Canon PowerShot D30 dives deep (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

pjl321: Is it really that hard to make a high-end water proof camera?

Underwater cameras need all the light they can get so why give this camera a tiny, tiny f3.9 maximum aperture, compounded by using a tiny, tiny 1/2.3" sensor!

All I want is a waterproof Sony RX100M II, beautiful 1" sensor, 20mp, super fast f1.8 lens, 10fps and 1080p60. Too much to ask?

Me too! I love ruggedized cameras but want something along the lines of a Fuji 16 MP. Markets dictate however; is their enough of a demand for pro level camera costing around $2,000?

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 03:26 UTC

Foveon? Are you still here dear? Thought you went home years ago.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 21:07 UTC as 20th comment
On article Waterproof Canon PowerShot D30 dives deep (35 comments in total)

Still think the WG cameras look more bad-boy than this tub toy.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 21:04 UTC as 7th comment
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sannaborjeson: Just another slow compact for the price of really good mirror less camera. To me the whole concept of such camera is slightly outdated.

What would you say outperforms it in the under $1,000 category?
Not being a pain - just really want to know.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 20:58 UTC
On article Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II: a quick summary (533 comments in total)

The viewfinder on every G camera I've ever owned or used is at best an approximation of what you're actually photographing. But then again I was a Leica M user for many years, so that's a tough act to follow. The G cameras are misunderstood by many; it's so much more than a high end P&S.

Link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 20:55 UTC as 73rd comment | 1 reply

Generally macro lenses don't make great portrait lenses; they tend to be too sharp - who wants forensic detail in a portrait anyway? It's not so much a question of focal length or magnification as portrait is a loosely defined term at best. Camera to subject distance has has much to to with perspective (elongation or foreshortening) of the foreground, main subject and background and the photographer's relationship to the subject.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2014 at 05:05 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
On article Phase One announces IQ250 50MP CMOS medium format back (192 comments in total)
In reply to:

brycesteiner: You can shoot a lot of film for that price, with a larger dynamic range.

Does DPReview do reviews on this equipment?

The entire debate of film vs digital is ridiculous and, as they say say, "purely academic"; it's a matter of quantization. As a middle aged commercial photographer I have a fondness in my heart for the silver processes for everything form Kodachrome to Portriga Rapid - but those days are gone. Film and paper will carry on as a fine art medium just as charcoal pencils and artist's oils are still sold and used. If you yearn for that film look, there are some plug in's sold by DxO and others that look quite realistic. Comparisons are meaningless at this point.( I sleep with a box of 4X5 Tri-X under my pillow - OK)?

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2014 at 12:29 UTC
On article Phase One announces IQ250 50MP CMOS medium format back (192 comments in total)
In reply to:

Artistico: I wonder if the day will come that someone will dare make a sensor in a digital medium format camera that is actually several smaller sensors put together rather than one big one. Surely with clever processing, easily available in this day and age, it should be possible to equalise any small differences between the sensors in the output, just like there is processing going on behind the lines to correct CA and distortion in several cameras. If that could make an affordable medium format camera, I'm sure there would be many potential takers.

3x3 APSc sensors would make a nice size of roughly 60x45

I believe there was a capture back marketing by Sinar about 15 or so years ago based on similar (multiple sensor) technology. They offered (I think) a single, four and sixteen exposure option for greatest detail and dynamic range. I remember the system was priced comparably with that of a Mercedes S class sedan at the time. I welcome any corrections.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 20:10 UTC
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (184 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sam_Oslo: It's probably a photoshop fake, otherwise the logo would read "Hr", LOL.

But the A7r is a much better candidate than NEX7 as a high-price luxury gadget. So this will probably become a reality soon.

Maybe Solidworks™ as well.

http://www.solidworks.com/

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 19:26 UTC
On article Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? (184 comments in total)

Some people also bought gold leaf topped Alpa cameras back in the '70's - I think. I couldn't afford one so I had a pet rock instead. This Hassy looks perfect for stalking the likes of a jackalope and bigfoot. If I were proficient in Solidworks, I'd be hoaxing here as well. Solaris would have been a better name than Solar; a great science fiction story.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 19:24 UTC as 18th comment

I guess Rome has fallen (again):
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/01/24/phase-one-announces-iq250-50mp-cmos-medium-format-back?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=news-list&utm_medium=text&ref=title_0_0

Either that, or the three little ships Didn't sail off the edge of the earth:
http://www.phaseone.com/en/FooterMenu/Press-releases.aspx

Will there be an option to attach it to a folding Fuji 645?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 19:14 UTC as 5th comment
On article Phase One announces IQ250 50MP CMOS medium format back (192 comments in total)

I guess Rome has fallen (again):
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/01/24/phase-one-announces-iq250-50mp-cmos-medium-format-back?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=news-list&utm_medium=text&ref=title_0_0

Either that, or the three little ships Didn't sail off the edge of the earth:
http://www.phaseone.com/en/FooterMenu/Press-releases.aspx

Will there be an option to attach it to a folding Fuji 645?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 19:12 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

Lawrence33: There was an old song that one of my many mentors would sing while shooting.
The 'Opening' line went something like this, " .... park you chewing gum, and razors at the door, drop your ego outside the church 'cause your 'er going to learn some more. .... "
I've been at it for a very long time and have worked with many Hasselblads and all the related equipment.
You, who have never work with the MF cameras or Hasselblad. And are not engineers, should go sit in the corner and chew on your ego.
Go take some pictures. We use to say, years ago, " That's really nice, but what have you done lately ? "

Two different worlds and perspectives. Can't really expect one type of camera or technology to satisfy all needs, methods and styles. It doesn't help to berate anyone for their enthusiasm even if it is uniformed; teach someone kindly and you will be the wiser.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 00:40 UTC
On article Pictures emerge showing widely-leaked Fujfilm 'X-T1' (372 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Nice, all it needs is an FF sensor.

An X-Trans type sensor 6cm X 4.5cm, 60 megapixels.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 21:41 UTC
On article Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera (906 comments in total)
In reply to:

srados: I do not understand why FUJI FILM does not drop FILM from name and call themselves FUJI.

As to differentiate it from say Fuji Heavy Industries, which makes things such as Subaru's and aircraft engines.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 18:34 UTC
On article Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera (906 comments in total)

I knew my Fujica ST 801 would fine it's way home again! It was always such the orphan child of cameras except when it out-shined camera costing 3 times as much with it's image quality. Go Fuji!

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 18:29 UTC as 12th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

creaDVty: Actually Mr. Ian Rawcliffe IS Dr. Hansen wearing a bespoke suit made of exotic wool. And of course he changed his name.

Maybe Porsche will make a minivan.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 03:48 UTC

Who's CMOS would have the best image quality if scaled up to 645 size? Will Leaf and Phase One follow?

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 03:43 UTC as 25th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

AndyGM: Hmm... I thought JK Imaging's gameplan was to focus (no pun intended) on the Chinese market, where Kodak is still a well known brand (and an American brand at that), and there is a lot of anti Japanese sentiment? The idea being to hoodwink the Chinese public into believing they are buying an "American" camera and none of that nasty Japanese stuff, when in reality they are selling either a modified Japanese camera made side by side in the same factory that said Japanese company uses, or a Chinese knockoff of something that was a Japanese idea in the first place.

I don't think that the Chinese photo consumer is so unsophisticated as you would imply. Also, the cultural as opposed to marketplace sentiments are for the large part unfounded; the most desirable jeans in Iran are genuine Levis brand. If they are made in the USA (few are actually) they are even more highly prized. Go figure.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2014 at 17:26 UTC
Total: 243, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »