jaygeephoto

jaygeephoto

Joined on Sep 4, 2011

Comments

Total: 243, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

rondhamalam: Bullsh*t !!!
Certified??? big LoL

Certifiable.

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 20:01 UTC

Can I have Victor's voice on my message?

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 19:54 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

MarcusGR: A very complicated way to obtain a rather miserable result ... connecting a large, horizontal circle of cameras all around an action-scene would have provided a much more interesting result ... OK, it would have been more costly as well. But at least worth the effort !

Hope their professor gave them a decent grade for the effort.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 02:56 UTC

Terrific! A truly nauseating perspective here on Earth for a fraction of the cost of actual going into outer space.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 02:53 UTC as 29th comment
On article Canon USA brings white EOS Rebel SL1 to America (115 comments in total)

John Lennon would have loved this camera.

Link | Posted on May 13, 2014 at 12:53 UTC as 45th comment
On article Did Amazon just patent the seamless background setup? (133 comments in total)

So the method of image or for that matter audio capture/recording is patentable? What a joke! I really had to check the date on my calendar to see that it wasn't April 1st; this story is right up there with some of NPR's April Fool's Day news parodies like exploding maple trees.
Oh gee, was my avatar photographed on a white background? I'll cease and desist!

Link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 12:04 UTC as 8th comment
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)

Panache Bauhaus minimalist, yes. But who wants to shell out that amount of cash for something that's going to be obsolete in 5 years? It's a digital camera.
No doubt it will be the up front window dressing in the Dubai mall camera shop soon enough.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 19:47 UTC as 440th comment
On article Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z (161 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jack Simpson: wow, I can just imagine attaching a long 645 lens to my Q7 :o

I have some old view camera lenses here you can have. Along with some cardboard tubes, black spray paint and duct tape may give you similar results.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 15:03 UTC
On article Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z (161 comments in total)

I need some help understanding the sensor size and lens line up offered: If in fact these lenses are designed to cover the original 6X4.5 cm film area then they would be designed around a larger image circle and therefor be less than optimal? The sensor size seems to be about 73% of the 6X4.5 cm area making the lenses have a comparable magnification factor of about 1.4?
If someone makes an 80mm TS lens for this, I'm all in.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 15:00 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

smafdy: As usual, Pentax offers the highest quality and feature set in a camera format, at a comparably affordable price, and . . .

. . . some people have an immediate sh!t hemorrhage over it.

Everybody knows that it would have been much easier to just make this pocket-sized, with a mount that would accept any lens ever made, a pop-up 72" Octobox w/1600 WS internal flash, red-eye reduction, noise-free ISO 50 - 102400, high speed (2,000 fps) video capture, waterproof to 3,000 meters, and a few more essential features like a screw driver, bottle opener, scissors, a compartment to hold emergency gear (firestarter, fish hook and line, at minimum), and a secret message decoder.

Pentax just can't get it right.

You forgot to mention GPS.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 23:33 UTC
In reply to:

Monochrom: Remember when no one could believe the price for the RED ONE to be true?
Five years later and you get about the same specs for a quarter of that money.
A shame that the lens you'll need will still cost you at least 10K...

You're referring (I'm assuming) to cine lenses?

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 22:52 UTC
In reply to:

SithTracy: There is a BFH in the shot... is that the tool?

Hammer, vise grips and duct tape - you need anything else?

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 01:45 UTC

The Gauss Goose

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 01:42 UTC as 92nd comment
In reply to:

papa natas: Well, does the name Sally Mann ring a bell?

Yes. First thing I thought of - less stylized here though.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2014 at 12:40 UTC
On article Camera from NASA's moon missions sold at auction (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: He got himself an expensive movie prop. Ha ha

Probably owns some "original" Salvador Dalis' as well. Next stop on the list, Brooklyn, NY - "Bridge for sale, famous architect, some wear."
Where's the wire viewfinder?

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 18:11 UTC
On article Camera from NASA's moon missions sold at auction (104 comments in total)
In reply to:

BGM: Gee I thought the camera was Nasa property and hence belongs to the US tax payers.

NASA, all caps.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 18:08 UTC
On article Camera from NASA's moon missions sold at auction (104 comments in total)

100 exposure Ektachrome 64 on a cellophane thin Mylar base (acetate would become too brittle and break under the cold and vacuum) was no small feat either. Ah, Kodak could when it had to.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2014 at 23:59 UTC as 23rd comment
Total: 243, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »