PC-dot-Com

2,500 of them are "unique"

I'm so glad this camera is in the affordable range and that I took the leap to get one. Talk about a freaking great camera. I had the D3 too, and yes it was impressive, but not like the D3s ...

Tracking birds, doing portraits, whatever... what a great camera with such a great aps-c sensor. Yeah, it admittedly takes some skill to master, but all things worth working for are worth doing. ...

Oh yes, I call it the practical test side to file quality vs. mathematical test side. All being considered, the Mark II is some 2-2.5 stops more usable in the raw files than the 7D, and at least a ...

100%! :)

Lol, well put ;)

I do believe he was being tongue and cheek with that reply Jozef. I'd much rather rely on real use and my own eyes looking at screen and prints than washed out data on DXO. I used to be a fan of ...

Wow! 3M actuations, that's insane good!

Too bad, its actually very enjoyable.

You might want to re-think your "upgrade" the 7D II is nearly future proof. Less dynamic range, it still is punch for punch right there with the D500 in nearly every category. I own both. https://w ...

All those degrees backed by loans that will never get paid off hard at work on yet more theoretical stuff.

or you could say

Great way to destroy the mold of tradition and think outside the box

Just found this. Guess I'm not the only one questioning it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTuBr0W0Zhw

Interesting, budget MF lenses now.

Anyone else find the DXO sports/lowlight score of the 7D Mark II a bit confounding? When I'm reviewing raw comparisons to cameras often with higher scores, I find the 7D II's raw images look ...