Remcodb

Sensitive topic once again, looking at the divided reactions it created! I agree with the above: IQ from a lens is not just about technical facts (blurred background is, 'bokeh' isn't). The f/1.4 ...

I have the XT3 with the ISO dial and XE3 without, assigned to the front dial. I like the ISO dial a lot because I change it frequently, going from outdoor to indoor, from landscape to street, from ...

You will like the XE3 for that! I use mine mostly with smallish lenses. 15-45 will be nice. 55-200 is rather big. Thought about using the f2 primes; they work great on the XE3?

Beautiful! What is that work platform doing next to Fort Boyard, are they renovating it, did someone buy it for commercial use? Like that fort, used to be our view from the beach for many summer ...

I own exactly the lenses at the FL you are interested in, my comments as follows: 23 f2: You definitely need this FL for street. As mentioned before, for street you tend to dial aperture in a bit ...

Lovely!

I agree with the choice above XT3+ XF 18-135 , also a backpacker here. Sometimes I go heavier as follows: XT3 + XF 10-24 + XF 55-200. (I don't trust the build quality of XC lenses for my use, never ...

Neo, For astro I get the following settings: around 10mm, f/4, 25 sec, ISO 6400. See image below. No star trails at that shutter, but the ISO is higher than I would like. I've happily shot ISO 3200 ...

My non-technical answer is that your aspired combo sounds great. I’ve always had a quality wide angle zoom in my system, even though when going Fuji (going small/light) I delayed buying the 10-24 ...

Yeah, but it depends on which XTrans sensor. I found that the Lr Detail slider worked great with the XT1, but not with the XT3 and XE3 I use now. Need to keep it pretty low. Overall I find that Lr ...

To your last concern, I think the 23 is not too similar to the 35; it is a useful step wider, but not too wide. Especially if you already have the 35 and 56, I think the 23 is a very good addition ...

I was surprised reading your title, but i would not consider it a sin if you already have the XT3 and XT2. 2 camera’s not enough? If you think you need small, I do can recommend the XE3 which I ...

By the best: (1) Go for 77mm filters with step up rings, so you are covered for life. One day you will buy a larger lens...

The XF 55-200 is real good. Sharp and has IOS. I have it and makes one not need the 50-140, unless you need the f/2.8 (I don't, I have the 56 f/1.2). X-T1, XF 55-200, 200mm, f/8

photo 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are really nice! I like to keep it simple on walks or short trips with a 2/23 and 2/35. Not done a full trip like that yet, tend to bring more and chose for the day or ...

X-E3 is the smallest APS-C camera and a good step down from X-T3 with similar quality and handling. I have these and use the X-E3 with a 2/23 and 2/35 for lightweight carry around. Sweet spot! thou ...

The Nikon images seem to have the most natural color and contrast; they look nice! It may be your style has changed through the years.

It doesnt make sense to compare these camera’s; they are in different price classes. You need to decide what you want to spend on it first. Buy good glass. Never go cheap on glass (Tamron) to ...

Both. I agree with earlier comments that the average FL means nothing and you got to try each to see. If you dont want to go through that: for street the neutral bet would be 2/23 with wider FOV, ...

Great lens for travel, landscape and nature! For top IQ I normally stop it down to its sweet spot and try to avoid the very end of 135mm. It is the only compromise with this lens. I’ve bought and ...