DuxX

-> good decision -> not sure for this ;D

I think that Sony was made great job with current lens line up. Decently small and light lens but with great optical quality. 24mm f1.4 440 grams - YES please, 12-24 f4 560 grams - YES please, FE ...

I am glad if I can help. Maybe is good approach to rent some equipment and try by yourself. Try it in different light situations especially in strong backlight. Also I forget to say that Sigma Art ...

Yes, on Canon dslr's Sigma Art lens working properly but unfortunately this is not case with EOS R. EOS R is different system. I've noticed some exposure inconsistencies (mostly underexposure ...

Don't forget that you will not see any Canon RF 1.4 prime L lens soon. So I am not sure that you're going to make right move if you choose Canon. Also if you plan to use Sigma Art lens they not ...

Did you tried to use Canon profiles in LR? If you use Adobe Color profile as your standard color profile skin colors will be a bit greenish. Fuji is also better with Provia/Standard profile. Unfort ...

Yes. This is the point.

The simply... small and lightweight Canon f1.8 aperture glasses are not for professional use. That's why Canon doesn't have any L-Class lenses with f1.8 aperture. That doesn't mean those lenses ...

Fuji X-T3 is my second camera mostly for video but I'm thinking very seriously for full switch to Fuji system. I think that Canon seriously missing what the MILC system should be. Enormous big ...

@NicoPPC ... you simply don't understand... trees can't be properly photographed without full frame and big f1.2 lens because you need maximum aperture for professional isolation of main subject...

ecka84, If you take look at my linked gallery (which I guess you already did) you will find there some photos ;) Some of them was taken with EOS 6D, EOS R (35mm f1.4, 85mm 1.2, 16-35 f4) and Fuji...

@ecka84
unfortunately backyard tree, grass and cat shooters as you simply can't understand that f1.8 equivalent on pro grade glass like XF 56 1.2 is not the same as 1.8 on plastic crap like EF 85...

@Raynaud all users need something they don't have in current systems and always something is missing. As a Canon EOS R user I gonna wait for next few years for pro grade RF 1.4 primes or I'll sold...

Do not underestimate Sony because Sony currently have great f1.4 primes line up that Canon won't made in next few years. Sony need to fix color issues and I'll probably sold my R and all C glass...

"(Fuji 16-55mm 2.8) it is also sharper corner to corner" - Not really.

Compared with RF 24-70 this Fuji isn't nothing less sharp BUT it is 30% lighter and more than 50% smaller and almost 3x...

Some good f1.4 line up of pro grade primes will be more than enough for me. Canon will not do that in next couple of years for sure. Unfortunately.

@vscd I won't buy Sony because I don't like Sony colors. I want Canon R5 body (which is great body) with smaller and lighter RF f1.4 primes not f1.2 bulky glass. That is what I want. Until that...

@Niko vita, yes Canon tech promised the same or better image quality in smaller and lighter lens. I know because I was there.

@vscd it is not point if you have smaller body with bigger lens....

@vscd I'm not saying that smaller size and weight need to be ONLY goal but one of the goals - sure. In time when EOS R was announced some Canon tech guys told us that MILC technology gives their...

Who talking about cinema lenses? My point is that Canon currently offers only f1.2 pro glass which is to big and to heavy for professional travel and lifestyle purpose.
f1.8 primes are more...