DuxX

There is no better lens line up currently on the market. Optically best and at the same time fastest, smallest and lightest. It can't be better and they are expensive. But with Sony you can always...

Thank you. I am handling it somehow for now ;)

The future is bright! ... if we know how to use all that new super-tech. ;)

@Koeman, I have a7IV and 6 Sony lenses. One zoom, rest are primes so I often change lenses and no problems with dust at all. My ex EOS R I cleaned once or two times per year. I bough a7IV in...

@Koeman, I have a7IV and 6 Sony lenses. One zoom, rest are primes so I often change lenses and no problems with dust at all. My ex EOS R I cleaned once or two times per year. I bough a7IV in...

@Koeman, I have a7IV and 6 Sony lenses. One zoom, rest are primes so I often change lenses and no problems with dust at all. My ex EOS R I cleaned once or two times per year. I bough a7IV in...

You call Sony GM lens a "cheap plastic" :) and you talk about fboy hate.. :)
Check all new G and GM lens and compare with similar lens of other brands.

@Cat Productions, Almost every new Sony lens is smallest and ligthest in their class. That is some kind of company legacy that Canon users dont understand.

Ouch...after "too small mount" we have now one more pro-canon myth... a dusty mount. yeye :)

They will respond with some bulky, heavy half-useful brick-lens like they always do. ;)

Sony keeps making smallest, lightest and optically best lenses in class respectively. Good job Sony - that's how it should be done. First FF camera with global shutter is just one more proof of...

Are you serious? :) Who will ever need lens such this? 16-35 f4 PZ + Tamron 35-150 is approximately the same weight and offers much better optical range and f2 when you need and on the same price...

...ye ye... great video with what? With this brick? That's why I call lens like this a halfuseful tool. ;) it is not for video because too heavy. Not for all-around shooting because too heavy. Not...

Why is it so difficult to understand that there are people who, in addition to optical performance, value the weight and size of the lens. Different people have different needs and wants.

If you are in Sony system you have many small, light and optically powerful solutions. You don't need brick like this. Smallest, lightest 24-70 f2.8 or if you like to test your shoulders... Tamron...

...and add one mule to be able to carry that on a long hikes.

You know... sadomasochism really exists. :)

Okay...nothing new. One more super-bulky, super-expensive and half-useful lens from Canon. :| Smoking of magic mushrooms continues.

I don't need or don't wish nothing big or bulky. Not interested in MF. There is just one more lens I wish from Sony - one small, light and beautiful 14-30 f4 G gem. Nothing more. :)

@Astro Landscapes, I agree mostly but ability to enhance bokeh can be very useful in some cases. It's not just a matter of aesthetics. For example if you shoot commercial or stock often you need to...