Azfar

Lives in United States Farmington Hills, MI, United States
Works as a Engineer
Has a website at www.facebook.com/ahmad.azfar
Joined on Jun 25, 2011

Comments

Total: 60, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

Bummer.

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2014 at 07:12 UTC as 46th comment

f1.8-5.6 what ? is this still 2010 ?

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2014 at 05:06 UTC as 42nd comment | 4 replies
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (622 comments in total)

I don't get it. Why offer NEX specs in an SLR body ? I am genuinely perplexed.

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2013 at 09:36 UTC as 215th comment | 3 replies

Ugly has a new name.

What is up with Hasselblad anyway, they are getting weirder with every launch.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2013 at 14:54 UTC as 88th comment
On article Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM preview (149 comments in total)

What was wrong with 24-105 ?

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 19:10 UTC as 38th comment | 4 replies
On article Nikon unveils 24.1MP D5200 DSLR with optional Wi-Fi (392 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kaelaqua: hey dpreview.can you do a side by sidee comparison of d5100 and d5200. i had almost finalised on d5100. is d5200 worth the price?

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=nikon_d5100&products=nikon_d5200

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 05:57 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G15 preview (81 comments in total)

Now that they have got constant aperture across the focal length in super-zooms (FZ200 and V-lux 4) how long before we start seeing them in enthusiast compacts . Not that F1.8-2.8 is any bad. Still, i reckon it wont be long before we see one in this segment as well.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 09:49 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies

How about S100 MKII ?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 17:42 UTC as 4th comment
On article Fujifilm XF1 hands-on preview (133 comments in total)

Any word on the pricing yet ?

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm XF1 hands-on preview (133 comments in total)

You thing of beauty !!!! I can buy this camera for its look alone if nothing else.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 07:00 UTC as 68th comment

I want one !!!!! oh wait ......

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14 UTC as 48th comment
In reply to:

DrugaRunda: People here like to think "by the book" - and if you are outside "cannon" you are dead, so to speak. In this particular case, if it is "small sensor" it is rubbish type of thinking.

Try before you trash... and other than that, check DxO, while not up with the best M 4/3, APS-C or better, for the sensor Q scores in the same league as some older M 4/3rds cameras or for example Nikon D50... which while old now is still excellent, and noone was really complaining that you cannot take photos with it, while it was current.

Nothing stopped thosands of people making millions of great photos with a D50, nor will anyhting stop you today to do the same with the Q, or even better being that Q is 4x smaller than a D50, thus more friendly to carry around, has great controls and equivalent IQ...

What's not to love about it, other than a preconcived notion that so many love to get stuck into...

"pre conceived notion" ? really. That's how your going to put a 'Fact' based on science ? that a small sensor has its limitations.
and you know, citing DXO marks for a camera, well why not put the stats on the packaging as well, so that people should know what they are missing.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 14:17 UTC

If only it had a 1/1.7" sensor.

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2012 at 13:56 UTC as 18th comment | 5 replies
On photo Light in the Light challenge (2 comments in total)

Agreed !!

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2012 at 07:51 UTC as 1st comment
On photo the green hills of dikhololo in the Light challenge (1 comment in total)

Brilliant !!

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2012 at 07:45 UTC as 1st comment

1000$ fixed focal lens camera with VGA video recording. Seriously ?

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2012 at 11:00 UTC as 37th comment | 4 replies

I can not, for the life of me, fathom this 'slr-like' class of cameras. Whats the point, really. They all have the small P&S sensors for crying out loud. Whats 'SLR-Like' about them...the body? then where does the 'bridge camera' gimmick come in? seriously. If anything, a large body must be required to house that zoom lenses but for all intent and purposes they should 'only' be called super zooms and nothing more.

Link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 16:57 UTC as 38th comment | 6 replies
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (564 comments in total)

As always, excellent user interface.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 08:31 UTC as 232nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ericsan: What a boring new camera...such a long wait for a very basic product !!
Will not wait for the upcoming & upgraded models...bye bye Canon, hello Panasonic/Olympus you will get my money for my needed backup mirrorless camera, your models are much more exciting,innovative...
Cheers !!

I doubt if Panasonic / Olympus will give you an APS-C sensor in a body that size.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 08:29 UTC

An APS-C sensor in that body. I will take one. In red probably. and yeah, take that V1.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 08:14 UTC as 324th comment
Total: 60, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »