J C Strange

whoever is doing the product photos for this site is doing a great job. Keep up the good work!

Those reasons make sense. Thanks for the explanations!

One thing I don't understand is the constant talk about "out of camera JPGs." Who buys a $2000+ camera and then shoots JPG?

F-Stop, hands down

To make it clear, I appreciate some things Skylum has done. However, they continually tell us they are fixing the basic problems only to offer us more bells and whistles we never asked for.

I have been burned by this company too many times to believe a thing they say. Have an actual review or I'm not interested.

This is good people! Tamron/Sigma can't be far behind!

After struggling with Luminar for years this looks enticing, especially the camera brand specific pricing.

Tamron's lenses these days LOOK so damn good!

So I had this crazy idea and I thought I would share it. First, some background. As many of you probably know Nikon is struggling for various reasons. News recently broke that Samsung is set to ...

Nikon is offering their online classes for free.

Looks like the 200-600mm is going to be quite large. (that or the 600mm prime is small.) Either way, those are the ones I'm waiting for.

I mean, the equivalent aperture in full frame is f/9.

That is a comparable lens in focal length only. My point was that since this is m4/3 the lens is actually much smaller both in materials and aperture. Seems like it should cost less too. Maybe be...

Oh, really? Which lenses are you comparing it to?

How can they charge $7500 for this when there are similar Full Frame (much more glass) lenses for less than $2000?

O......K?

Getting Roger Cicala to write for you was such a good thing DPR! I'm loving it. Now you just need Dave Etchells and you'll be king.

OMG. This brings "Lightroom is to expensive" to a whole new level.

Awesome camera but why is the noise reduction non-optional?