moizes 2

Lives in United States Brooklyn, United States
Works as a prophotographer
Joined on Aug 19, 2003

Comments

Total: 180, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

RIP...

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2022 at 17:52 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

FM1978: Boring. Another big black lump of a camera. No ergonomic or interface advance. Just gee-whiz speeding up of the processors to handle 8k data throughput.

What's exciting about this camera, photographically speaking, or from a photographer's point of view, rather than a spec enthusiast's?

FM1978 Since the camera is seen by nobody, yet, people judging it by its specs. Nothing wrong with it. Every technical miracle has passed this step. You should accept it. Take it easy, cose people will think uncomplimentary of you...

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2021 at 18:00 UTC
On article Video: An angry raven nearly takes down delivery drone (150 comments in total)

It is dangerous to drink a lot of coffee... The bird is smart!

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2021 at 00:03 UTC as 18th comment

All of the 2.8 lenses on this camera are soft enough, less or more. Only one lens is really sharp, tremendously sharp - the Opton 75/3.5! When I used it, I have to carry 2 of them, because mechanical parts, sometimes, let me down. Especially when you go 120 from 220, and wise versa. The wide one with a 55 lens, was soft to the corners, but usable.

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2021 at 03:22 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies

R.I.P...

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2021 at 11:53 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

MiguelSanArchangel: I am a Leica owner, and I am miffed! It's true, we need help!

No more myths about Leica owners! What kind of bad taste about it? (BTW, are you a dentist or lawyer?).

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2021 at 00:44 UTC
In reply to:

jbuzzinco: Pentax is really swinging at windmills. They're trying to improve on the APS-C DSLR which likely has already reached its pinnacle of design. The only way to further improve it is by removing the mirror. . . which Pentax has committed not to do.

But Zvonimir, ISO 1,600,000 looks somewhat anecdotical, you should be agreed.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2020 at 21:21 UTC

Any possibility to go info in? Any connections?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2020 at 16:33 UTC as 15th comment

Leica's lens must be tested on its own sensor. As well as a comparable device. Sorry, but the rest of one's eloquence isn't interesting for me anymore!

Link | Posted on Aug 22, 2020 at 13:41 UTC as 40th comment | 1 reply

Nobody should even try to overhit the camera - any camera - if you don't want to create the dead pixels!

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2020 at 11:45 UTC as 303rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Mike FL: So, Russian sold its Zenit M logo to Leica after Leica sold its logo to Chinese Huawei for packet money while Fuji is just thinking for what next X100 looks like? Zenit M? or Leica M?

Tendency. Fuji's last Pro-3 model looks exactly like very old Russia-made Zorky-4.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2019 at 04:17 UTC
On article Hands-on: What you need to know about the new Leica SL2 (524 comments in total)
In reply to:

moizes 2: So there is a contrast-detection only... It clearly means there will be a little bit of hunting. Very little one, but it must, due to its nature. As darker around, as more hunting. Tell me I am wrong, and why,
and I'll be happy! Really!

Yeah, looks like... Will wait and see.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2019 at 13:07 UTC
On article Hands-on: What you need to know about the new Leica SL2 (524 comments in total)

So there is a contrast-detection only... It clearly means there will be a little bit of hunting. Very little one, but it must, due to its nature. As darker around, as more hunting. Tell me I am wrong, and why,
and I'll be happy! Really!

Link | Posted on Nov 7, 2019 at 23:59 UTC as 29th comment | 8 replies

He was a landmark among all of us... RIP, dear MASTER...

Link | Posted on Sep 11, 2019 at 17:44 UTC as 12th comment
On article Sigma 35mm F1.2 Art sample gallery updated (179 comments in total)

Technically, great lens, even wide open. What is this lens was designed for - with its own personality being wide open, and usual good lens closed down. Big and heavy, so, is not for me.

Link | Posted on Sep 6, 2019 at 11:49 UTC as 25th comment | 1 reply
On article Tamron SP 35mm F1.4 Di USD sample gallery (108 comments in total)

Looks like this one is a real success. Wide open, there is a trace of CA and coma, in the extreme corners , almost invisible at 2.0, and completely gone to 2.8. At 1.4 very good from, say, 2-3 meters to infinity, with some loss of resolution to minimal distance objects. Very good at 2.0, and stunning at 2.8, in terms of resolution, from minimal distance to infinity. Very good, vibrant and true color gamut. I was not able to find any traces of flare, even under direct sunlight. Very, very good lens for any pro application. As any extra sharp and contrast lens, there is not much to say about its personality, the one is not a dream glass. It is what I am thinking about this wonder lens, based on given images. Your opinion may vary.

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2019 at 20:52 UTC as 20th comment

Wow amazing, impressive!

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2019 at 23:40 UTC as 13th comment
On article Tamron 35-150mm F2.8-4 Di VC OSD sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

CekariYH: Great focal length and aperture range, but I can't find one sharp image in the gallery?

longzoom flickr no capitals one word longzoom

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2019 at 23:32 UTC
On article Tamron 35-150mm F2.8-4 Di VC OSD sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

CekariYH: Great focal length and aperture range, but I can't find one sharp image in the gallery?

@CekariYH: There is no hummingbirds in my posts. You looked at wrong topics. Sorry.

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2019 at 13:48 UTC
On article Tamron 35-150mm F2.8-4 Di VC OSD sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

CekariYH: Great focal length and aperture range, but I can't find one sharp image in the gallery?

@CekariYH: I took a look at your link - sorry, but it is soft, absolutely. Do not have any idea why you call it "perfectly sharp"? Just take a look at Flickr, under the nickname "longzoom" - my own images, technical ones, with crops, mostly. Then, you will get the idea what I mean "SHARP"! Please do! THX!

Link | Posted on Aug 16, 2019 at 10:37 UTC
Total: 180, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »