moizes 2

Lives in United States Brooklyn, United States
Works as a prophotographer
Joined on Aug 19, 2003

Comments

Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art Sample Gallery (122 comments in total)
In reply to:

dennis tennis: my iphone takes way better pictures and I'm sexier using the iphone compared to lugging around a big dinosaur DSLR. Hot women come up to me when I whip out my iphone and sling it around like a mack daddy. When I bend over to extract my ancient DSLR from my backpack, thus revealing my plumber's crack, women run away. Let's face it, women check out that sexy iphone bulge on my rear skinny jean pocket. The outline of that iphone 7, seals the deal baby!

In this case, it is much better to put Leica 10 on one's chest! To show prosperity it is OK, do not even put the battery inside! One will be surrounded by hot young Ladies! BTW, this new Sig is really good, but heavy SOB! Next great achievement from Sigma!

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2017 at 15:00 UTC
On article Ming Thein joins Hasselblad as Chief of Strategy (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

moizes 2: They are not able to find better person for such the job! Congs and very best wishes to Ming and Hassel!

Ming is a great practical photographer on the field. One of the best, to be exact. So he knows for sure what we need. Very educated, with great knowledge and skills. This job is for him!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 19:27 UTC
On article Ming Thein joins Hasselblad as Chief of Strategy (346 comments in total)

They are not able to find better person for such the job! Congs and very best wishes to Ming and Hassel!

Link | Posted on Mar 29, 2017 at 14:55 UTC as 34th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

moizes 2: A lot of words and termination equilibristic... The 300/4 lens will be 300/4 lens on any sensor, from Nikon 1 to 8x10 camera (if such the sensor ever existed). Do not move your tripod and object, and this lens, with different angle of view, will deliver the same DOF on any size sensor. More photons, less photons... Smaller sensor, less photons! Everything balanced by format and size of the sensor! Rise your ISO, and more electrically charged sensor will deliver more light sensitivity/more grain/less DR. Lower your ISO - less charged sensor delivers less sensitivity/less grain/wider DR. So 24-35/2 at 35mm, will equal to 44/2.5 lens on MF for DOF calculations ONLY! On FF format the 44/2.5 MF lens will stay 44/2.5 lens, as well as on the Nikon 1 format, with different angle, but with the same DOF, if you are staying still with your object and tripod! If you move back or closer, this lens, while still 44/2.5, will deliver different angle of view, as well as different DOF! Come on!

We are speaking about physical characteristics of the any given lens, not the changes to composition or perspectives, what is clearly clarified. Do not compare apples to oranges. Stay, and DOF is the same. Move back, and DOF getting greater. But the lens itself will be the same, doesn't matter what format in use, what some of you can't accept. Come on, for Boy sake!

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2017 at 15:14 UTC
In reply to:

moizes 2: A lot of words and termination equilibristic... The 300/4 lens will be 300/4 lens on any sensor, from Nikon 1 to 8x10 camera (if such the sensor ever existed). Do not move your tripod and object, and this lens, with different angle of view, will deliver the same DOF on any size sensor. More photons, less photons... Smaller sensor, less photons! Everything balanced by format and size of the sensor! Rise your ISO, and more electrically charged sensor will deliver more light sensitivity/more grain/less DR. Lower your ISO - less charged sensor delivers less sensitivity/less grain/wider DR. So 24-35/2 at 35mm, will equal to 44/2.5 lens on MF for DOF calculations ONLY! On FF format the 44/2.5 MF lens will stay 44/2.5 lens, as well as on the Nikon 1 format, with different angle, but with the same DOF, if you are staying still with your object and tripod! If you move back or closer, this lens, while still 44/2.5, will deliver different angle of view, as well as different DOF! Come on!

If you stay you'll have the 600/4 equivalency. If you move back to get the same angle of view of FF, then only you get F8.0 eq. of DOF.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2017 at 13:52 UTC

A lot of words and termination equilibristic... The 300/4 lens will be 300/4 lens on any sensor, from Nikon 1 to 8x10 camera (if such the sensor ever existed). Do not move your tripod and object, and this lens, with different angle of view, will deliver the same DOF on any size sensor. More photons, less photons... Smaller sensor, less photons! Everything balanced by format and size of the sensor! Rise your ISO, and more electrically charged sensor will deliver more light sensitivity/more grain/less DR. Lower your ISO - less charged sensor delivers less sensitivity/less grain/wider DR. So 24-35/2 at 35mm, will equal to 44/2.5 lens on MF for DOF calculations ONLY! On FF format the 44/2.5 MF lens will stay 44/2.5 lens, as well as on the Nikon 1 format, with different angle, but with the same DOF, if you are staying still with your object and tripod! If you move back or closer, this lens, while still 44/2.5, will deliver different angle of view, as well as different DOF! Come on!

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2017 at 08:21 UTC as 123rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

moizes 2: After upgrading, my 810 needs extra +3 to Fine tune. Any comments?

That's possible, but there isn't any certain reason for such the strange behavior. I'll report any changes.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2017 at 07:44 UTC
In reply to:

moizes 2: After upgrading, my 810 needs extra +3 to Fine tune. Any comments?

Oh yes...

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2017 at 18:41 UTC

After upgrading, my 810 needs extra +3 to Fine tune. Any comments?

Link | Posted on Mar 14, 2017 at 02:24 UTC as 3rd comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

joe6pack: You can feel the suffering of the camera by looking at its blinking light.

Yeah... Exactly like my old Explorer, when it was swallowed by Sandy 4 years ago... Good-by light and horn fading, emitted by dying car...

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 16:34 UTC

So what is the practical target of this barbarically made test? Power of overpressed water gear? Dead camera body turned inside out? Why?

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 16:28 UTC as 50th comment | 7 replies
On article Nikon reportedly eliminating 1000 jobs in Japan (518 comments in total)

Nikon clearly and profoundly denies that, couple hours ago. No plans to cutting jobs. Let as wait and see.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 03:14 UTC as 138th comment
On article Hands-on and in-depth with the Sony a6500 (556 comments in total)

Giant concern sees the way to dramatically improve their 6300 model very fast. In eyes of some it is very bad. In my eyes it is just stunning how rapidly Sony reacts on our demands. New 6500 incarnation is giant step forward towards us, so we are the very last instance of fair judgement! Well done, Sony, so, if needed, I'll welcome 6700 model in next 9 months! Guys, do not pay any attention to some endlessly wining people who has never taken images but criticize every new product, what is really never seen by them, yet! Come on, for Boy sake! Go ahead, Sony!

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2016 at 14:58 UTC as 48th comment | 5 replies
On article Pinnacle Prime: Olympus ED 25mm F1.2 Pro sample gallery (200 comments in total)

While sharpness is OK wide open, questionable quality against source of light... Too much of flare and hosting, contrast impacted very seriously. 1.8 version looks better on this respect. Both are not any usable for close portraiture - just bad joke! Faces are greatly deformed.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 19:59 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply

My copy of this lens is razor sharp thru the zoom, especially at 400mm. Stunningly sharp lens, even wide open! Way better than any 70-200 with any TC. So, I do not need both of my 70-200 anymore, especially outside. To work in, I'll wait for good 135/2 with VR, from Nikon or third party manufacturer, to use it wide open.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2016 at 12:49 UTC as 3rd comment

Not impressed. It is not a world Leica level. Very few images are deserve attention.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2016 at 13:30 UTC as 7th comment | 3 replies

Come on, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am first on line to get it! I gonna give $200 for this monster, and pay for delivery! Insurance on the house, as usual!

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2016 at 10:16 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

tkbslc: Only f9 equivalent in m4/3.

It is still 2000 f4.5 equivalent on 4/3 sensor.

Link | Posted on Jun 17, 2016 at 10:11 UTC

RIP, Michael! You were greatest!

Link | Posted on May 19, 2016 at 21:39 UTC as 128th comment
In reply to:

SETI: Not as good as Canon 24-70mm mkII

andrewD2. True. I've seen no images at 42MP. I've seen a lot at 50MP. While I am Nikonian, have to admit that Canon 24-70-2 is better. Simply like this.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
Total: 128, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »