Lu64

Lu64

Lives in Luxembourg Luxembourg
Works as a Graphics Art Engineer
Joined on Mar 15, 2012

Comments

Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Why are these raws so small. Imaging Resource posted 80D raws a few days ago, and they're on the order of 32MB to 46MB per file?

Lossless compression is right. The phenomena of smaller files happends with less noise...

There are no compression options for raw files...

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 11:50 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: expose properly, what is that? something Canon has invented?
does not answer my question, why a new sensor in Canon, there are no need for better DR due the Canon boys

Again: because they can do it now!

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 07:34 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: well David, I have been written about the poorer DR in Canon since 2008 and I wonder, WHY are Canon now changing their sensor read out and to less noise ?During all the years I have received the answer- Canon's DR is good enough, expose properly from the fan boys, and to me it make no sense to invest money in something Canon fan boys already said is good enough ( or is it as long Canon has no answer to Sony)

Well, the Canon sensor was good, now it's better! No need for a polemic around this. If you look at the tests, you allways got a mixed image. If you look at the comments, there is a lot of superflous, meaningless oppinion, including yous and thios one.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 07:26 UTC
In reply to:

ovlov: But... But.. But... All I hear from the Canon apologists on here is that Canon's products are fine with the dynamic range they have. No improvement is needed!

I guess we can now safely say that even Canon disagrees with ALL of you.

DR matters, but it is only part of the equation. Resoliution matters too, but also here it's only part of the equation. I'm still saying that my D20's 8 Mpix are enough for getting correct and awsome pictures. But I still porefer my current 5DMIII for its fast AF, high ISO, higher resolution (yes, even if 8 is OK, 20 is better) and higher DR.

It's not a religion, it's simply technological progress.

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2016 at 07:15 UTC
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: why put a new sensor inside a Canon ? there are no need to have a larger dynamic range according many comments during the years here at Dpreview and at other Canon sites. why not settle for the higher noise and banding as usual

Pffffff.... If you have nothing intelligent to contribute, then stay quiet!

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 12:57 UTC
In reply to:

PetaPi: I think Canon paid a lot of money to get a positive article about the 80D.
Or did some favours to Amazon.
Grasping at straws.
Canon now has better blacks ? Is that it ?

@PetaPi - how many are you paid to publish negatives on Canon? Don't be a fool and make a fool of yourself.

When I bought my first Canon, it was the best of his class. Then, later, Nikon and Sony (Minolta) took over the lead. I had invested in lenses, so I stayed with Canon. It's not a religious mantra for me to stay with Canon, but only to protect my invest in lenses. If Canon can now take over again, it's a standard situation in a race, where nobody will ever see the finish line.

Link | Posted on Mar 24, 2016 at 12:51 UTC

There are better ways to achive a flawless workflow without edited images. Cropping and level adjustments are NOT edits of an image, except when done in very rare circumstances to change the perception of a picture.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2015 at 11:36 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

scrup: Maybe everyone else will ban RAWs then we can really move to a universal lossless format. RAWs are good but I hate the thought of maintaining the software to open my images in 10-15 years.

JPEG at least is no "universal lossless" format. RAW is not a format but a category of formats.

This is out of scope.

Link | Posted on Nov 28, 2015 at 07:43 UTC
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

attomole: Does it fit a standard tripod mount?

sure!

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 15:37 UTC
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Osvaldo Cristo: "The camera will be able to process 30TB of data every night"

Ahaaa! The NSA big brothers will need more disks for their spy computers to record that massive amount of data...

Who would be able to provide you with a backup copy in case of a failure of your computer?

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 15:37 UTC
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

jabilson007: Completed in 2022?! Who is working on this, the Canon 7D team?!

7 years for a project existing on paper until now is very optimistic. I would love to be the project manager of this!

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2015 at 15:34 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

pwmoree: So 1000 euro equals 1390 usdollar. Why is this lens 39 percent more expensive here in Europe? The 390 $ difference almost buys you a plane ticket to the USA to go and get one and have a weekend in NY included..

Proof of payment IS required! not that easy! If they let you pass, you are a lucky guy!

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 09:55 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

pwmoree: So 1000 euro equals 1390 usdollar. Why is this lens 39 percent more expensive here in Europe? The 390 $ difference almost buys you a plane ticket to the USA to go and get one and have a weekend in NY included..

I can assure you, when you pass customs and don't have the proof of payements, YOU will pay them!

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2014 at 14:23 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

pwmoree: So 1000 euro equals 1390 usdollar. Why is this lens 39 percent more expensive here in Europe? The 390 $ difference almost buys you a plane ticket to the USA to go and get one and have a weekend in NY included..

If you buy in the US (as an European), you need to pay sales tax and customs dues at the arrival. And please keep your receipts ... as there may be problems afterwards.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 14:47 UTC
In reply to:

Biological_Viewfinder: I'm so sick of the Nickel & Dime you to death economy of our age.
-
My smart phone was $500 (free with signup, but I'm sure that I'll pay that $500 along the way). But if I want to do so, I can spend THOUSANDS MORE and my smart phone even better! With APPS....
-
Adobe and TV companies and car dealerships, EVERYONE is getting in on this new economy. They all say, well it's only this much per month. Yeah, but if you add up this and that and that and this and that and this and that...
-
@$(# adobe!
I don't mind buying software, but these guys are thieves.

You pay the phone provider the service to phone, not to own!

Link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 06:08 UTC

This is strange (c) law - as usual.

From where I come, you may take pictures and commercialize those of monuments that are permananently displayed in public places. The creator of the artwork has the right to be named, but that's it.

There would have been no problem, if the picture would have been taken to display the Corean war in a non-profit event. But as the stamps are sold for profit, this changes the fact. Notice also, that neither the artist nor the place of exhibition have been named.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 22:55 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

spidermoon: I guess tumblr user shake in fear too :)

Yeah... it's an earthquake for billions of dollars...

Link | Posted on May 24, 2013 at 23:46 UTC
In reply to:

ScottRH: She is an idiot. I never use their products or services.

An idiot rarely gets paid that amount of money...

Link | Posted on May 24, 2013 at 23:45 UTC
Total: 57, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »